Negatively interdependent preferences

Ahmet Ok, Levent Koçkesen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We develop a theory of representation of interdependent preferences that reflect the widely acknowledged phenomenon of keeping up with the Joneses (i.e. of those preferences which maintain that well-being depend on "relative standing" in the society as well as on material consumption). The principal ingredient of our analysis is the assumption that individuals desire to occupy a (subjectively) better position than their peers. This is quite a primitive starting point in that it does not give any reference to what is actually regarded as "status" in the society. We call this basic postulate negative interdependence, and study its implications. In particular, combining this assumption with some other basic postulates that are widely used in a number of other branches of the theory of individual choice, we axiomatize the relative income hypothesis, and obtain an operational representation of interdependent preferences.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)533-558
    Number of pages26
    JournalSocial Choice and Welfare
    Volume17
    Issue number3
    StatePublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    interdependence
    well-being
    income
    Interdependent preferences
    Society
    Relative income
    Relative standing
    Well-being
    Interdependence
    Peers

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

    Cite this

    Ok, A., & Koçkesen, L. (2000). Negatively interdependent preferences. Social Choice and Welfare, 17(3), 533-558.

    Negatively interdependent preferences. / Ok, Ahmet; Koçkesen, Levent.

    In: Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2000, p. 533-558.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Ok, A & Koçkesen, L 2000, 'Negatively interdependent preferences', Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 533-558.
    Ok A, Koçkesen L. Negatively interdependent preferences. Social Choice and Welfare. 2000;17(3):533-558.
    Ok, Ahmet ; Koçkesen, Levent. / Negatively interdependent preferences. In: Social Choice and Welfare. 2000 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 533-558.
    @article{fa625a15ff90429f885fa828d24998fd,
    title = "Negatively interdependent preferences",
    abstract = "We develop a theory of representation of interdependent preferences that reflect the widely acknowledged phenomenon of keeping up with the Joneses (i.e. of those preferences which maintain that well-being depend on {"}relative standing{"} in the society as well as on material consumption). The principal ingredient of our analysis is the assumption that individuals desire to occupy a (subjectively) better position than their peers. This is quite a primitive starting point in that it does not give any reference to what is actually regarded as {"}status{"} in the society. We call this basic postulate negative interdependence, and study its implications. In particular, combining this assumption with some other basic postulates that are widely used in a number of other branches of the theory of individual choice, we axiomatize the relative income hypothesis, and obtain an operational representation of interdependent preferences.",
    author = "Ahmet Ok and Levent Ko{\cc}kesen",
    year = "2000",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "533--558",
    journal = "Social Choice and Welfare",
    issn = "0176-1714",
    publisher = "Springer New York",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Negatively interdependent preferences

    AU - Ok, Ahmet

    AU - Koçkesen, Levent

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - We develop a theory of representation of interdependent preferences that reflect the widely acknowledged phenomenon of keeping up with the Joneses (i.e. of those preferences which maintain that well-being depend on "relative standing" in the society as well as on material consumption). The principal ingredient of our analysis is the assumption that individuals desire to occupy a (subjectively) better position than their peers. This is quite a primitive starting point in that it does not give any reference to what is actually regarded as "status" in the society. We call this basic postulate negative interdependence, and study its implications. In particular, combining this assumption with some other basic postulates that are widely used in a number of other branches of the theory of individual choice, we axiomatize the relative income hypothesis, and obtain an operational representation of interdependent preferences.

    AB - We develop a theory of representation of interdependent preferences that reflect the widely acknowledged phenomenon of keeping up with the Joneses (i.e. of those preferences which maintain that well-being depend on "relative standing" in the society as well as on material consumption). The principal ingredient of our analysis is the assumption that individuals desire to occupy a (subjectively) better position than their peers. This is quite a primitive starting point in that it does not give any reference to what is actually regarded as "status" in the society. We call this basic postulate negative interdependence, and study its implications. In particular, combining this assumption with some other basic postulates that are widely used in a number of other branches of the theory of individual choice, we axiomatize the relative income hypothesis, and obtain an operational representation of interdependent preferences.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034386244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034386244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0034386244

    VL - 17

    SP - 533

    EP - 558

    JO - Social Choice and Welfare

    JF - Social Choice and Welfare

    SN - 0176-1714

    IS - 3

    ER -