Negative campaigns, interpersonal trust, and prosocial behavior: The mediating effect of democratic experience

Nicholas Haas, Mazen Hassan, Rebecca Morton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous studies of negative election campaigns have not addressed the possible effects of campaign environments on interpersonal trust and prosocial behavior between voters. We provide the first evidence of these effects through an incentivized lab experiment conducted among student subjects in Egypt in 2014 and in the United States in between 2016 and 2018. This comparison allows us to tease out the mediating effect of subjects’ prior experience with competitive elections. In our Egypt experiment, trust in other voters significantly decreased (by 15%) when voters were primed with a negative personality campaign as compared to a neutral baseline. Interpersonal trust also decreased in negative policy campaigns (by 8%). Among US subjects however, such effects do not materialize. Our explanation of these divergent outcomes is that the priming effect of negative election campaigns on interpersonal trust takes place when the experience of competitive elections is still quite new.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number102087
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume63
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2020

Fingerprint

campaign
election campaign
experience
Egypt
election
experiment
personality
evidence
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Negative campaigns, interpersonal trust, and prosocial behavior : The mediating effect of democratic experience. / Haas, Nicholas; Hassan, Mazen; Morton, Rebecca.

In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 63, 102087, 02.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{225e24207c1148ccaf4f2467e782e060,
title = "Negative campaigns, interpersonal trust, and prosocial behavior: The mediating effect of democratic experience",
abstract = "Previous studies of negative election campaigns have not addressed the possible effects of campaign environments on interpersonal trust and prosocial behavior between voters. We provide the first evidence of these effects through an incentivized lab experiment conducted among student subjects in Egypt in 2014 and in the United States in between 2016 and 2018. This comparison allows us to tease out the mediating effect of subjects’ prior experience with competitive elections. In our Egypt experiment, trust in other voters significantly decreased (by 15{\%}) when voters were primed with a negative personality campaign as compared to a neutral baseline. Interpersonal trust also decreased in negative policy campaigns (by 8{\%}). Among US subjects however, such effects do not materialize. Our explanation of these divergent outcomes is that the priming effect of negative election campaigns on interpersonal trust takes place when the experience of competitive elections is still quite new.",
author = "Nicholas Haas and Mazen Hassan and Rebecca Morton",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102087",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
journal = "Electoral Studies",
issn = "0261-3794",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negative campaigns, interpersonal trust, and prosocial behavior

T2 - The mediating effect of democratic experience

AU - Haas, Nicholas

AU - Hassan, Mazen

AU - Morton, Rebecca

PY - 2020/2

Y1 - 2020/2

N2 - Previous studies of negative election campaigns have not addressed the possible effects of campaign environments on interpersonal trust and prosocial behavior between voters. We provide the first evidence of these effects through an incentivized lab experiment conducted among student subjects in Egypt in 2014 and in the United States in between 2016 and 2018. This comparison allows us to tease out the mediating effect of subjects’ prior experience with competitive elections. In our Egypt experiment, trust in other voters significantly decreased (by 15%) when voters were primed with a negative personality campaign as compared to a neutral baseline. Interpersonal trust also decreased in negative policy campaigns (by 8%). Among US subjects however, such effects do not materialize. Our explanation of these divergent outcomes is that the priming effect of negative election campaigns on interpersonal trust takes place when the experience of competitive elections is still quite new.

AB - Previous studies of negative election campaigns have not addressed the possible effects of campaign environments on interpersonal trust and prosocial behavior between voters. We provide the first evidence of these effects through an incentivized lab experiment conducted among student subjects in Egypt in 2014 and in the United States in between 2016 and 2018. This comparison allows us to tease out the mediating effect of subjects’ prior experience with competitive elections. In our Egypt experiment, trust in other voters significantly decreased (by 15%) when voters were primed with a negative personality campaign as compared to a neutral baseline. Interpersonal trust also decreased in negative policy campaigns (by 8%). Among US subjects however, such effects do not materialize. Our explanation of these divergent outcomes is that the priming effect of negative election campaigns on interpersonal trust takes place when the experience of competitive elections is still quite new.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075069692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075069692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102087

DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102087

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075069692

VL - 63

JO - Electoral Studies

JF - Electoral Studies

SN - 0261-3794

M1 - 102087

ER -