### Abstract

We consider the relative performance of two common approaches to multiple imputation (MI): joint multivariate normal (MVN) MI, in which the data are modeled as a sample from a joint MVN distribution; and conditional MI, in which each variable is modeled conditionally on all the others. In order to use the multivariate normal distribution, implementations of joint MVN MI typically assume that categories of discrete variables are probabilistically constructed from continuous values. We use simulations to examine the implications of these assumptions. For each approach, we assess (1) the accuracy of the imputed values; and (2) the accuracy of coefficients and fitted values from a model fit to completed data sets. These simulations consider continuous, binary, ordinal, and unordered-categorical variables. One set of simulations uses multivariate normal data, and one set uses data from the 2008 American National Election Studies. We implement a less restrictive approach than is typical when evaluating methods using simulations in the missing data literature: in each case, missing values are generated by carefully following the conditions necessary for missingness to be "missing at random" (MAR). We find that in these situations conditional MI is more accurate than joint MVN MI whenever the data include categorical variables.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 497-519 |

Number of pages | 23 |

Journal | Political Analysis |

Volume | 22 |

Issue number | 4 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - Jan 1 2014 |

### Fingerprint

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations

### Cite this

*Political Analysis*,

*22*(4), 497-519. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu007