Movement planning with probabilistic target information

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examined how subjects plan speeded reaching movements when the precise target of the movement is not known at movement onset. Before each reach, subjects were given only a probability distribution on possible target positions. Only after completing part of the movement did the actual target appear. In separate experiments we varied the location of the mode and the scale of the prior distribution for possible targets. In both cases we found that subjects made use of prior probability information when planning reaches. We also devised two tests (Composite Benefit and Row Dominance tests) to determine whether subjects' performance met necessary conditions for optimality (defined as maximizing expected gain). We could not reject the hypothesis of optimality in the experiment where we varied the mode of the prior, but departures from optimality were found in response to changes in the scale of prior distributions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3034-3046
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume98
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Movement planning with probabilistic target information. / Hudson, Todd E.; Maloney, Laurence T.; Landy, Michael S.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 98, No. 5, 11.2007, p. 3034-3046.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f6b5613e94a4ea5a28f94aac0b935a7,
title = "Movement planning with probabilistic target information",
abstract = "We examined how subjects plan speeded reaching movements when the precise target of the movement is not known at movement onset. Before each reach, subjects were given only a probability distribution on possible target positions. Only after completing part of the movement did the actual target appear. In separate experiments we varied the location of the mode and the scale of the prior distribution for possible targets. In both cases we found that subjects made use of prior probability information when planning reaches. We also devised two tests (Composite Benefit and Row Dominance tests) to determine whether subjects' performance met necessary conditions for optimality (defined as maximizing expected gain). We could not reject the hypothesis of optimality in the experiment where we varied the mode of the prior, but departures from optimality were found in response to changes in the scale of prior distributions.",
author = "Hudson, {Todd E.} and Maloney, {Laurence T.} and Landy, {Michael S.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1152/jn.00858.2007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "3034--3046",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Movement planning with probabilistic target information

AU - Hudson, Todd E.

AU - Maloney, Laurence T.

AU - Landy, Michael S.

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - We examined how subjects plan speeded reaching movements when the precise target of the movement is not known at movement onset. Before each reach, subjects were given only a probability distribution on possible target positions. Only after completing part of the movement did the actual target appear. In separate experiments we varied the location of the mode and the scale of the prior distribution for possible targets. In both cases we found that subjects made use of prior probability information when planning reaches. We also devised two tests (Composite Benefit and Row Dominance tests) to determine whether subjects' performance met necessary conditions for optimality (defined as maximizing expected gain). We could not reject the hypothesis of optimality in the experiment where we varied the mode of the prior, but departures from optimality were found in response to changes in the scale of prior distributions.

AB - We examined how subjects plan speeded reaching movements when the precise target of the movement is not known at movement onset. Before each reach, subjects were given only a probability distribution on possible target positions. Only after completing part of the movement did the actual target appear. In separate experiments we varied the location of the mode and the scale of the prior distribution for possible targets. In both cases we found that subjects made use of prior probability information when planning reaches. We also devised two tests (Composite Benefit and Row Dominance tests) to determine whether subjects' performance met necessary conditions for optimality (defined as maximizing expected gain). We could not reject the hypothesis of optimality in the experiment where we varied the mode of the prior, but departures from optimality were found in response to changes in the scale of prior distributions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36248951103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36248951103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00858.2007

DO - 10.1152/jn.00858.2007

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 3034

EP - 3046

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 5

ER -