Motivation and volition in the course of action

Anja Achtziger, Peter Gollwitzer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Characteristics of the Action Perspective For Kurt Lewin (cf. Lewin, Dembo, Festinger,&Sears, 1944), there was never any doubt that motivational phenomena can only be properly understood and analyzed from an action perspective. Indeed, as he pointed out in support of this claim, processes of goal setting and goal striving are governed by distinct psychological principles. These insights went unheeded for several decades, however, probably for the simple reason that goal setting research based on the expectancy-value paradigm proved so successful (Festinger, 1942; Atkinson, 1957) and captured the full attention of motivation psychologists. It was not until the emergence of the psychology of goals (starting with Klinger's current concerns, 1977, and Wicklund's and Gollwitzer's self-definitional goals, 1982) and the psychology of action control (based on Kuhl's analysis of state vs. action orientation, 1983; see Chapter 12) that the processes and potential strategies of goal striving began to receive the attention that Kurt Lewin had already felt they deserved back in the 1940s (Oettingen&Gollwitzer, 2001). In contrast to the behaviorist approach, an action perspective on human behavior means extending the scope of analysis beyond simple stimulus-response bonds and the execution of learned habits. The concept of action is seen in opposition to such learned habits and automatic responses; it is restricted to those human behaviors that have what Max Weber (1921) termed “Sinn” (“meaning” or “sense”). In Weber's conceptualization, “action” is all human behavior that the actor deems to have “meaning.”

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMotivation and Action
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages272-295
Number of pages24
ISBN (Print)9780511499821, 9780521852593
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Motivation
Psychology
Habits
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Achtziger, A., & Gollwitzer, P. (2008). Motivation and volition in the course of action. In Motivation and Action (pp. 272-295). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499821.012

Motivation and volition in the course of action. / Achtziger, Anja; Gollwitzer, Peter.

Motivation and Action. Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 272-295.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Achtziger, A & Gollwitzer, P 2008, Motivation and volition in the course of action. in Motivation and Action. Cambridge University Press, pp. 272-295. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499821.012
Achtziger A, Gollwitzer P. Motivation and volition in the course of action. In Motivation and Action. Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 272-295 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499821.012
Achtziger, Anja ; Gollwitzer, Peter. / Motivation and volition in the course of action. Motivation and Action. Cambridge University Press, 2008. pp. 272-295
@inbook{e06cec9b64704001b91b14c4337a273a,
title = "Motivation and volition in the course of action",
abstract = "Characteristics of the Action Perspective For Kurt Lewin (cf. Lewin, Dembo, Festinger,&Sears, 1944), there was never any doubt that motivational phenomena can only be properly understood and analyzed from an action perspective. Indeed, as he pointed out in support of this claim, processes of goal setting and goal striving are governed by distinct psychological principles. These insights went unheeded for several decades, however, probably for the simple reason that goal setting research based on the expectancy-value paradigm proved so successful (Festinger, 1942; Atkinson, 1957) and captured the full attention of motivation psychologists. It was not until the emergence of the psychology of goals (starting with Klinger's current concerns, 1977, and Wicklund's and Gollwitzer's self-definitional goals, 1982) and the psychology of action control (based on Kuhl's analysis of state vs. action orientation, 1983; see Chapter 12) that the processes and potential strategies of goal striving began to receive the attention that Kurt Lewin had already felt they deserved back in the 1940s (Oettingen&Gollwitzer, 2001). In contrast to the behaviorist approach, an action perspective on human behavior means extending the scope of analysis beyond simple stimulus-response bonds and the execution of learned habits. The concept of action is seen in opposition to such learned habits and automatic responses; it is restricted to those human behaviors that have what Max Weber (1921) termed “Sinn” (“meaning” or “sense”). In Weber's conceptualization, “action” is all human behavior that the actor deems to have “meaning.”",
author = "Anja Achtziger and Peter Gollwitzer",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511499821.012",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511499821",
pages = "272--295",
booktitle = "Motivation and Action",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Motivation and volition in the course of action

AU - Achtziger, Anja

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Characteristics of the Action Perspective For Kurt Lewin (cf. Lewin, Dembo, Festinger,&Sears, 1944), there was never any doubt that motivational phenomena can only be properly understood and analyzed from an action perspective. Indeed, as he pointed out in support of this claim, processes of goal setting and goal striving are governed by distinct psychological principles. These insights went unheeded for several decades, however, probably for the simple reason that goal setting research based on the expectancy-value paradigm proved so successful (Festinger, 1942; Atkinson, 1957) and captured the full attention of motivation psychologists. It was not until the emergence of the psychology of goals (starting with Klinger's current concerns, 1977, and Wicklund's and Gollwitzer's self-definitional goals, 1982) and the psychology of action control (based on Kuhl's analysis of state vs. action orientation, 1983; see Chapter 12) that the processes and potential strategies of goal striving began to receive the attention that Kurt Lewin had already felt they deserved back in the 1940s (Oettingen&Gollwitzer, 2001). In contrast to the behaviorist approach, an action perspective on human behavior means extending the scope of analysis beyond simple stimulus-response bonds and the execution of learned habits. The concept of action is seen in opposition to such learned habits and automatic responses; it is restricted to those human behaviors that have what Max Weber (1921) termed “Sinn” (“meaning” or “sense”). In Weber's conceptualization, “action” is all human behavior that the actor deems to have “meaning.”

AB - Characteristics of the Action Perspective For Kurt Lewin (cf. Lewin, Dembo, Festinger,&Sears, 1944), there was never any doubt that motivational phenomena can only be properly understood and analyzed from an action perspective. Indeed, as he pointed out in support of this claim, processes of goal setting and goal striving are governed by distinct psychological principles. These insights went unheeded for several decades, however, probably for the simple reason that goal setting research based on the expectancy-value paradigm proved so successful (Festinger, 1942; Atkinson, 1957) and captured the full attention of motivation psychologists. It was not until the emergence of the psychology of goals (starting with Klinger's current concerns, 1977, and Wicklund's and Gollwitzer's self-definitional goals, 1982) and the psychology of action control (based on Kuhl's analysis of state vs. action orientation, 1983; see Chapter 12) that the processes and potential strategies of goal striving began to receive the attention that Kurt Lewin had already felt they deserved back in the 1940s (Oettingen&Gollwitzer, 2001). In contrast to the behaviorist approach, an action perspective on human behavior means extending the scope of analysis beyond simple stimulus-response bonds and the execution of learned habits. The concept of action is seen in opposition to such learned habits and automatic responses; it is restricted to those human behaviors that have what Max Weber (1921) termed “Sinn” (“meaning” or “sense”). In Weber's conceptualization, “action” is all human behavior that the actor deems to have “meaning.”

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926993475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926993475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511499821.012

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511499821.012

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511499821

SN - 9780521852593

SP - 272

EP - 295

BT - Motivation and Action

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -