More legislation, more violence? The impact of Dodd-Frank in the DRC

Nik Stoop, Marijke Verpoorten, Peter van der Windt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Dodd Frank Act was passed by the US Congress in July 2010 and included a provision—Section 1502—that aimed to break the link between conflict and minerals in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. To date there is only one rigorous quantitative analysis that investigates the impact of Dodd-Frank on local conflict events. Looking at the short-term impact (2011–2012), it finds that the policy backfired. This study builds on a larger, more representative, dataset of mining sites and extends the time horizon by three years (2013–2015). The results indicate that the policy also backfired in the longer run, especially in areas home to gold mines. For territories with the average number of gold mines, the introduction of Dodd-Frank increased the incidence of battles with 44%; looting with 51% and violence against civilians with 28%, compared to pre-Dodd Frank averages. Delving deeper into the impact of the conflict minerals legislation is important, as President Trump suspended the legislation in February 2017 for a two-year period, ordering his administration to replace it with another policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0201783
JournalPLoS One
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

violence
Gold mines
Legislation
Violence
laws and regulations
Minerals
Gold
gold
minerals
Democratic Republic of the Congo
quantitative analysis
Chemical analysis
incidence
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

More legislation, more violence? The impact of Dodd-Frank in the DRC. / Stoop, Nik; Verpoorten, Marijke; van der Windt, Peter.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 13, No. 8, e0201783, 01.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stoop, Nik ; Verpoorten, Marijke ; van der Windt, Peter. / More legislation, more violence? The impact of Dodd-Frank in the DRC. In: PLoS One. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 8.
@article{1aeb595754c1439da43ecb1892aa58ad,
title = "More legislation, more violence? The impact of Dodd-Frank in the DRC",
abstract = "The Dodd Frank Act was passed by the US Congress in July 2010 and included a provision—Section 1502—that aimed to break the link between conflict and minerals in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. To date there is only one rigorous quantitative analysis that investigates the impact of Dodd-Frank on local conflict events. Looking at the short-term impact (2011–2012), it finds that the policy backfired. This study builds on a larger, more representative, dataset of mining sites and extends the time horizon by three years (2013–2015). The results indicate that the policy also backfired in the longer run, especially in areas home to gold mines. For territories with the average number of gold mines, the introduction of Dodd-Frank increased the incidence of battles with 44{\%}; looting with 51{\%} and violence against civilians with 28{\%}, compared to pre-Dodd Frank averages. Delving deeper into the impact of the conflict minerals legislation is important, as President Trump suspended the legislation in February 2017 for a two-year period, ordering his administration to replace it with another policy.",
author = "Nik Stoop and Marijke Verpoorten and {van der Windt}, Peter",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0201783",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - More legislation, more violence? The impact of Dodd-Frank in the DRC

AU - Stoop, Nik

AU - Verpoorten, Marijke

AU - van der Windt, Peter

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - The Dodd Frank Act was passed by the US Congress in July 2010 and included a provision—Section 1502—that aimed to break the link between conflict and minerals in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. To date there is only one rigorous quantitative analysis that investigates the impact of Dodd-Frank on local conflict events. Looking at the short-term impact (2011–2012), it finds that the policy backfired. This study builds on a larger, more representative, dataset of mining sites and extends the time horizon by three years (2013–2015). The results indicate that the policy also backfired in the longer run, especially in areas home to gold mines. For territories with the average number of gold mines, the introduction of Dodd-Frank increased the incidence of battles with 44%; looting with 51% and violence against civilians with 28%, compared to pre-Dodd Frank averages. Delving deeper into the impact of the conflict minerals legislation is important, as President Trump suspended the legislation in February 2017 for a two-year period, ordering his administration to replace it with another policy.

AB - The Dodd Frank Act was passed by the US Congress in July 2010 and included a provision—Section 1502—that aimed to break the link between conflict and minerals in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. To date there is only one rigorous quantitative analysis that investigates the impact of Dodd-Frank on local conflict events. Looking at the short-term impact (2011–2012), it finds that the policy backfired. This study builds on a larger, more representative, dataset of mining sites and extends the time horizon by three years (2013–2015). The results indicate that the policy also backfired in the longer run, especially in areas home to gold mines. For territories with the average number of gold mines, the introduction of Dodd-Frank increased the incidence of battles with 44%; looting with 51% and violence against civilians with 28%, compared to pre-Dodd Frank averages. Delving deeper into the impact of the conflict minerals legislation is important, as President Trump suspended the legislation in February 2017 for a two-year period, ordering his administration to replace it with another policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052299721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052299721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0201783

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0201783

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 8

M1 - e0201783

ER -