Moral reasoning and unprotected sex among young men

Jeanne Hernandez, Ralph DiClemente

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examined the influence of moral reasoning on young men’s HIV-related sexual risk behaviors, specifically unprotected sexual intercourse. It was hypothesized that those with higher stage moral reasoning will be more likely to practice safe sex. Male college students completed a measure of moral reasoning and a self-report questionnaire assessing sexual behavior. Those scoring high on moral reasoning reported significantly fewer incidents of unprotected sex and more respect for partners who wanted to practice safe sex. They also had fewer sex partners, reported fewer pick-ups, and their sexual motivation on dates was lower (the latter comparisons did not reach levels of significance). That students engage in risky sexual practices less when they use higher levels of moral reasoning is important to the health education discipline’s effort to promote safer sex. It speaks to incorporating training in higher levels of moral reasoning into sex education curricula, for example, by presenting moral sexual dilemmas for classroom discussion. The moral dilemma approach stimulates students to progress more rapidly through their own natural course of moral development, and summarily provides them with the tools to make responsible decisions about sexual behaviors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)347-351
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Health Education
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Safe Sex
Unsafe Sex
Sexual Behavior
Students
Moral Development
Sex Education
student
sex education
Coitus
education curriculum
Risk-Taking
Health Education
risk behavior
Curriculum
Self Report
health promotion
Motivation
respect
incident
HIV

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Moral reasoning and unprotected sex among young men. / Hernandez, Jeanne; DiClemente, Ralph.

In: Journal of Health Education, Vol. 23, No. 6, 01.01.1992, p. 347-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5c6ccb2c49ab435cb27e9069d920a42f,
title = "Moral reasoning and unprotected sex among young men",
abstract = "This study examined the influence of moral reasoning on young men’s HIV-related sexual risk behaviors, specifically unprotected sexual intercourse. It was hypothesized that those with higher stage moral reasoning will be more likely to practice safe sex. Male college students completed a measure of moral reasoning and a self-report questionnaire assessing sexual behavior. Those scoring high on moral reasoning reported significantly fewer incidents of unprotected sex and more respect for partners who wanted to practice safe sex. They also had fewer sex partners, reported fewer pick-ups, and their sexual motivation on dates was lower (the latter comparisons did not reach levels of significance). That students engage in risky sexual practices less when they use higher levels of moral reasoning is important to the health education discipline’s effort to promote safer sex. It speaks to incorporating training in higher levels of moral reasoning into sex education curricula, for example, by presenting moral sexual dilemmas for classroom discussion. The moral dilemma approach stimulates students to progress more rapidly through their own natural course of moral development, and summarily provides them with the tools to make responsible decisions about sexual behaviors.",
author = "Jeanne Hernandez and Ralph DiClemente",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10556699.1992.10616314",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "347--351",
journal = "American Journal of Health Education",
issn = "1932-5037",
publisher = "AAHPERD",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral reasoning and unprotected sex among young men

AU - Hernandez, Jeanne

AU - DiClemente, Ralph

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - This study examined the influence of moral reasoning on young men’s HIV-related sexual risk behaviors, specifically unprotected sexual intercourse. It was hypothesized that those with higher stage moral reasoning will be more likely to practice safe sex. Male college students completed a measure of moral reasoning and a self-report questionnaire assessing sexual behavior. Those scoring high on moral reasoning reported significantly fewer incidents of unprotected sex and more respect for partners who wanted to practice safe sex. They also had fewer sex partners, reported fewer pick-ups, and their sexual motivation on dates was lower (the latter comparisons did not reach levels of significance). That students engage in risky sexual practices less when they use higher levels of moral reasoning is important to the health education discipline’s effort to promote safer sex. It speaks to incorporating training in higher levels of moral reasoning into sex education curricula, for example, by presenting moral sexual dilemmas for classroom discussion. The moral dilemma approach stimulates students to progress more rapidly through their own natural course of moral development, and summarily provides them with the tools to make responsible decisions about sexual behaviors.

AB - This study examined the influence of moral reasoning on young men’s HIV-related sexual risk behaviors, specifically unprotected sexual intercourse. It was hypothesized that those with higher stage moral reasoning will be more likely to practice safe sex. Male college students completed a measure of moral reasoning and a self-report questionnaire assessing sexual behavior. Those scoring high on moral reasoning reported significantly fewer incidents of unprotected sex and more respect for partners who wanted to practice safe sex. They also had fewer sex partners, reported fewer pick-ups, and their sexual motivation on dates was lower (the latter comparisons did not reach levels of significance). That students engage in risky sexual practices less when they use higher levels of moral reasoning is important to the health education discipline’s effort to promote safer sex. It speaks to incorporating training in higher levels of moral reasoning into sex education curricula, for example, by presenting moral sexual dilemmas for classroom discussion. The moral dilemma approach stimulates students to progress more rapidly through their own natural course of moral development, and summarily provides them with the tools to make responsible decisions about sexual behaviors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914401216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84914401216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10556699.1992.10616314

DO - 10.1080/10556699.1992.10616314

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 347

EP - 351

JO - American Journal of Health Education

JF - American Journal of Health Education

SN - 1932-5037

IS - 6

ER -