Moral Foundations, System Justification, and Support for Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election

Aaron C. Weinschenk, Christopher Dawes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We examine the role of moral foundations and system justification in explaining support for Donald Trump in the 2016 general election using data from the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey. A number of important findings emerge. First, we find that there are important partisan and ideological differences when it comes to moral foundations and system justification. Second, we find that moral foundations predict support for Trump above and beyond traditional determinants of vote choice such as ideology, partisanship, religiosity, and demographic characteristics. Third, we find that a measure of political system justification is not related to vote choice in our sample. This casts doubt on the idea that support for Trump was mostly about protesting the political system. This paper adds to the growing body of research showing that psychological concepts and theories are important in understanding voter decision-making in the 2016 presidential election and in elections more generally.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)195-208
    Number of pages14
    JournalForum (Germany)
    Volume17
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    presidential election
    voter
    election
    political system
    ideology
    determinants
    decision making

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Moral Foundations, System Justification, and Support for Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election. / Weinschenk, Aaron C.; Dawes, Christopher.

    In: Forum (Germany), Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.07.2019, p. 195-208.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Weinschenk, Aaron C. ; Dawes, Christopher. / Moral Foundations, System Justification, and Support for Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election. In: Forum (Germany). 2019 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 195-208.
    @article{b3dde9079cce4d838ec5805efea230d9,
    title = "Moral Foundations, System Justification, and Support for Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election",
    abstract = "We examine the role of moral foundations and system justification in explaining support for Donald Trump in the 2016 general election using data from the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey. A number of important findings emerge. First, we find that there are important partisan and ideological differences when it comes to moral foundations and system justification. Second, we find that moral foundations predict support for Trump above and beyond traditional determinants of vote choice such as ideology, partisanship, religiosity, and demographic characteristics. Third, we find that a measure of political system justification is not related to vote choice in our sample. This casts doubt on the idea that support for Trump was mostly about protesting the political system. This paper adds to the growing body of research showing that psychological concepts and theories are important in understanding voter decision-making in the 2016 presidential election and in elections more generally.",
    author = "Weinschenk, {Aaron C.} and Christopher Dawes",
    year = "2019",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1515/for-2019-0012",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "195--208",
    journal = "Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics",
    issn = "1540-8884",
    publisher = "Berkeley Electronic Press",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Moral Foundations, System Justification, and Support for Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election

    AU - Weinschenk, Aaron C.

    AU - Dawes, Christopher

    PY - 2019/7/1

    Y1 - 2019/7/1

    N2 - We examine the role of moral foundations and system justification in explaining support for Donald Trump in the 2016 general election using data from the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey. A number of important findings emerge. First, we find that there are important partisan and ideological differences when it comes to moral foundations and system justification. Second, we find that moral foundations predict support for Trump above and beyond traditional determinants of vote choice such as ideology, partisanship, religiosity, and demographic characteristics. Third, we find that a measure of political system justification is not related to vote choice in our sample. This casts doubt on the idea that support for Trump was mostly about protesting the political system. This paper adds to the growing body of research showing that psychological concepts and theories are important in understanding voter decision-making in the 2016 presidential election and in elections more generally.

    AB - We examine the role of moral foundations and system justification in explaining support for Donald Trump in the 2016 general election using data from the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey. A number of important findings emerge. First, we find that there are important partisan and ideological differences when it comes to moral foundations and system justification. Second, we find that moral foundations predict support for Trump above and beyond traditional determinants of vote choice such as ideology, partisanship, religiosity, and demographic characteristics. Third, we find that a measure of political system justification is not related to vote choice in our sample. This casts doubt on the idea that support for Trump was mostly about protesting the political system. This paper adds to the growing body of research showing that psychological concepts and theories are important in understanding voter decision-making in the 2016 presidential election and in elections more generally.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072702977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072702977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1515/for-2019-0012

    DO - 10.1515/for-2019-0012

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85072702977

    VL - 17

    SP - 195

    EP - 208

    JO - Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

    JF - Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

    SN - 1540-8884

    IS - 2

    ER -