Moral decision-making among young muslim adults on harmless taboo violations

The effects of gender, religiosity, and political affiliation

Beyza Tepe, Zeynep Ecem Piyale, Selcuk Sirin, Lauren Rogers Sirin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Shweder's Big Three Theory of Intuitive moral approach has not yet been investigated in Muslim culture. We aim at replicating Haidt and his colleagues' (1993) work using harmless taboo violation stories with a Muslim population of 167 young adults in Turkey. Participants' justifications and victim references were examined in terms of the three ethics of morality and their subsequent link to perceived harmfulness. Results revealed that moral judgments differed by participants' gender, political affiliation, and religiosity. Women were more supportive of interference and felt more bothered than men. Secularists, Islamists, and also highly religious people were similar on most of the dimensions of moral decision making. Consequently, influences of moral intuitions varied by culture, political affiliation, religiosity level, and gender, while perceived harmfulness was most correlated to the ethic of divinity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-248
Number of pages6
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume101
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Taboo
Islam
Ethics
Young Adult
Decision Making
Intuition
Turkey
Population

Keywords

  • Moral ethics
  • Moral intuitions
  • Perceived harm
  • Political affiliation
  • Religiosity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Moral decision-making among young muslim adults on harmless taboo violations : The effects of gender, religiosity, and political affiliation. / Tepe, Beyza; Piyale, Zeynep Ecem; Sirin, Selcuk; Sirin, Lauren Rogers.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 101, 01.10.2016, p. 243-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8a6a086244040a198bda86f96972679,
title = "Moral decision-making among young muslim adults on harmless taboo violations: The effects of gender, religiosity, and political affiliation",
abstract = "Shweder's Big Three Theory of Intuitive moral approach has not yet been investigated in Muslim culture. We aim at replicating Haidt and his colleagues' (1993) work using harmless taboo violation stories with a Muslim population of 167 young adults in Turkey. Participants' justifications and victim references were examined in terms of the three ethics of morality and their subsequent link to perceived harmfulness. Results revealed that moral judgments differed by participants' gender, political affiliation, and religiosity. Women were more supportive of interference and felt more bothered than men. Secularists, Islamists, and also highly religious people were similar on most of the dimensions of moral decision making. Consequently, influences of moral intuitions varied by culture, political affiliation, religiosity level, and gender, while perceived harmfulness was most correlated to the ethic of divinity.",
keywords = "Moral ethics, Moral intuitions, Perceived harm, Political affiliation, Religiosity",
author = "Beyza Tepe and Piyale, {Zeynep Ecem} and Selcuk Sirin and Sirin, {Lauren Rogers}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "243--248",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral decision-making among young muslim adults on harmless taboo violations

T2 - The effects of gender, religiosity, and political affiliation

AU - Tepe, Beyza

AU - Piyale, Zeynep Ecem

AU - Sirin, Selcuk

AU - Sirin, Lauren Rogers

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Shweder's Big Three Theory of Intuitive moral approach has not yet been investigated in Muslim culture. We aim at replicating Haidt and his colleagues' (1993) work using harmless taboo violation stories with a Muslim population of 167 young adults in Turkey. Participants' justifications and victim references were examined in terms of the three ethics of morality and their subsequent link to perceived harmfulness. Results revealed that moral judgments differed by participants' gender, political affiliation, and religiosity. Women were more supportive of interference and felt more bothered than men. Secularists, Islamists, and also highly religious people were similar on most of the dimensions of moral decision making. Consequently, influences of moral intuitions varied by culture, political affiliation, religiosity level, and gender, while perceived harmfulness was most correlated to the ethic of divinity.

AB - Shweder's Big Three Theory of Intuitive moral approach has not yet been investigated in Muslim culture. We aim at replicating Haidt and his colleagues' (1993) work using harmless taboo violation stories with a Muslim population of 167 young adults in Turkey. Participants' justifications and victim references were examined in terms of the three ethics of morality and their subsequent link to perceived harmfulness. Results revealed that moral judgments differed by participants' gender, political affiliation, and religiosity. Women were more supportive of interference and felt more bothered than men. Secularists, Islamists, and also highly religious people were similar on most of the dimensions of moral decision making. Consequently, influences of moral intuitions varied by culture, political affiliation, religiosity level, and gender, while perceived harmfulness was most correlated to the ethic of divinity.

KW - Moral ethics

KW - Moral intuitions

KW - Perceived harm

KW - Political affiliation

KW - Religiosity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973487351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973487351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.012

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.012

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 243

EP - 248

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

ER -