Monocular and binocular detection of moving sinusoidal gratings

Aries R. Arditi, Patricia A. Anderson, J. Anthony Movshon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We compared observers' contrast sensitivities for monocularly presented drifting gratings with their sensitivities to various pair-combinations of these gratings. If the two gratings are presented one to each eye, are of low spatial frequency, and move in same direction, contrast sensitivity is nearly twice the monocular value; if the gratings move in opposite directions, there is little or no sensitivity difference between the monocular and dichoplic conditions. As spatial frequency increases, the difference between the same- and opposite-direction conditions becomes less marked, and both pair-combinations are about 1.4 times as detectable as their monocular components. A monocular combination of gratings drifting in opposite directions (a counterphase modulated grating) gives results much like the dichoptic opposite-direction combination at all spatial frequencies. If spatial frequency is fixed at a moderate value, and drift rate is varied, then the difference between same and opposite conditions increases with drift rate; the natural conclusion that stimulus velocity determines this difference is not. however, completely borne out by experiments in which spatial and temporal frequency are varied to hold velocity constant. Thus under conditions where velocity and direction information are known to be available at detection threshold, our results show that binocular combination depends on the direction of movement: directional information must thus be extracted at or prior to the confluence of binocular signals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-336
Number of pages8
JournalVision Research
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981

Fingerprint

Contrast Sensitivity
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Monocular and binocular detection of moving sinusoidal gratings. / Arditi, Aries R.; Anderson, Patricia A.; Movshon, J. Anthony.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1981, p. 329-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arditi, Aries R. ; Anderson, Patricia A. ; Movshon, J. Anthony. / Monocular and binocular detection of moving sinusoidal gratings. In: Vision Research. 1981 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 329-336.
@article{5347754cf2c5407ca9673df856d24494,
title = "Monocular and binocular detection of moving sinusoidal gratings",
abstract = "We compared observers' contrast sensitivities for monocularly presented drifting gratings with their sensitivities to various pair-combinations of these gratings. If the two gratings are presented one to each eye, are of low spatial frequency, and move in same direction, contrast sensitivity is nearly twice the monocular value; if the gratings move in opposite directions, there is little or no sensitivity difference between the monocular and dichoplic conditions. As spatial frequency increases, the difference between the same- and opposite-direction conditions becomes less marked, and both pair-combinations are about 1.4 times as detectable as their monocular components. A monocular combination of gratings drifting in opposite directions (a counterphase modulated grating) gives results much like the dichoptic opposite-direction combination at all spatial frequencies. If spatial frequency is fixed at a moderate value, and drift rate is varied, then the difference between same and opposite conditions increases with drift rate; the natural conclusion that stimulus velocity determines this difference is not. however, completely borne out by experiments in which spatial and temporal frequency are varied to hold velocity constant. Thus under conditions where velocity and direction information are known to be available at detection threshold, our results show that binocular combination depends on the direction of movement: directional information must thus be extracted at or prior to the confluence of binocular signals.",
author = "Arditi, {Aries R.} and Anderson, {Patricia A.} and Movshon, {J. Anthony}",
year = "1981",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(81)90160-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "329--336",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monocular and binocular detection of moving sinusoidal gratings

AU - Arditi, Aries R.

AU - Anderson, Patricia A.

AU - Movshon, J. Anthony

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - We compared observers' contrast sensitivities for monocularly presented drifting gratings with their sensitivities to various pair-combinations of these gratings. If the two gratings are presented one to each eye, are of low spatial frequency, and move in same direction, contrast sensitivity is nearly twice the monocular value; if the gratings move in opposite directions, there is little or no sensitivity difference between the monocular and dichoplic conditions. As spatial frequency increases, the difference between the same- and opposite-direction conditions becomes less marked, and both pair-combinations are about 1.4 times as detectable as their monocular components. A monocular combination of gratings drifting in opposite directions (a counterphase modulated grating) gives results much like the dichoptic opposite-direction combination at all spatial frequencies. If spatial frequency is fixed at a moderate value, and drift rate is varied, then the difference between same and opposite conditions increases with drift rate; the natural conclusion that stimulus velocity determines this difference is not. however, completely borne out by experiments in which spatial and temporal frequency are varied to hold velocity constant. Thus under conditions where velocity and direction information are known to be available at detection threshold, our results show that binocular combination depends on the direction of movement: directional information must thus be extracted at or prior to the confluence of binocular signals.

AB - We compared observers' contrast sensitivities for monocularly presented drifting gratings with their sensitivities to various pair-combinations of these gratings. If the two gratings are presented one to each eye, are of low spatial frequency, and move in same direction, contrast sensitivity is nearly twice the monocular value; if the gratings move in opposite directions, there is little or no sensitivity difference between the monocular and dichoplic conditions. As spatial frequency increases, the difference between the same- and opposite-direction conditions becomes less marked, and both pair-combinations are about 1.4 times as detectable as their monocular components. A monocular combination of gratings drifting in opposite directions (a counterphase modulated grating) gives results much like the dichoptic opposite-direction combination at all spatial frequencies. If spatial frequency is fixed at a moderate value, and drift rate is varied, then the difference between same and opposite conditions increases with drift rate; the natural conclusion that stimulus velocity determines this difference is not. however, completely borne out by experiments in which spatial and temporal frequency are varied to hold velocity constant. Thus under conditions where velocity and direction information are known to be available at detection threshold, our results show that binocular combination depends on the direction of movement: directional information must thus be extracted at or prior to the confluence of binocular signals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019470259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019470259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90160-7

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90160-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 7269310

AN - SCOPUS:0019470259

VL - 21

SP - 329

EP - 336

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 3

ER -