Models of interdependent individuals versus dyadic processes in relationship research

Masumi Iida, Gwendolyn Seidman, Patrick Shrout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article, we consider the statistical models that are appropriate to understand relationship processes between two people who are in a committed relationship. Some of these processes capture inherently individual processes where individuals happen to be interrelated and others capture inherently dyadic processes. We compare several different statistical approaches to model these phenomena, including the actor–partner interdependence model, common fate model, and a dyadic score model. We compare and contrast these models using a data set on closeness and time spent together from 201 couples where one partner is distinguished by stress associated with an upcoming professional exam. The models yield results that appear to give different interpretations of the data. We discuss situations in which each model may be preferred and invite relationship researchers to model relationship data using the statistical model that matches their conceptual framework, rather than using a rigid statistical methodology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-88
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Social and Personal Relationships
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Statistical Models
Research
Research Personnel
interdependence
Datasets
interpretation
methodology

Keywords

  • Actor–partner interdependence model
  • common fate model
  • dyadic data
  • dyadic score model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Communication
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Models of interdependent individuals versus dyadic processes in relationship research. / Iida, Masumi; Seidman, Gwendolyn; Shrout, Patrick.

In: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 59-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbe41cb1b84448708a0704127f22b76e,
title = "Models of interdependent individuals versus dyadic processes in relationship research",
abstract = "In this article, we consider the statistical models that are appropriate to understand relationship processes between two people who are in a committed relationship. Some of these processes capture inherently individual processes where individuals happen to be interrelated and others capture inherently dyadic processes. We compare several different statistical approaches to model these phenomena, including the actor–partner interdependence model, common fate model, and a dyadic score model. We compare and contrast these models using a data set on closeness and time spent together from 201 couples where one partner is distinguished by stress associated with an upcoming professional exam. The models yield results that appear to give different interpretations of the data. We discuss situations in which each model may be preferred and invite relationship researchers to model relationship data using the statistical model that matches their conceptual framework, rather than using a rigid statistical methodology.",
keywords = "Actor–partner interdependence model, common fate model, dyadic data, dyadic score model",
author = "Masumi Iida and Gwendolyn Seidman and Patrick Shrout",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0265407517725407",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "59--88",
journal = "Journal of Social and Personal Relationships",
issn = "0265-4075",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Models of interdependent individuals versus dyadic processes in relationship research

AU - Iida, Masumi

AU - Seidman, Gwendolyn

AU - Shrout, Patrick

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In this article, we consider the statistical models that are appropriate to understand relationship processes between two people who are in a committed relationship. Some of these processes capture inherently individual processes where individuals happen to be interrelated and others capture inherently dyadic processes. We compare several different statistical approaches to model these phenomena, including the actor–partner interdependence model, common fate model, and a dyadic score model. We compare and contrast these models using a data set on closeness and time spent together from 201 couples where one partner is distinguished by stress associated with an upcoming professional exam. The models yield results that appear to give different interpretations of the data. We discuss situations in which each model may be preferred and invite relationship researchers to model relationship data using the statistical model that matches their conceptual framework, rather than using a rigid statistical methodology.

AB - In this article, we consider the statistical models that are appropriate to understand relationship processes between two people who are in a committed relationship. Some of these processes capture inherently individual processes where individuals happen to be interrelated and others capture inherently dyadic processes. We compare several different statistical approaches to model these phenomena, including the actor–partner interdependence model, common fate model, and a dyadic score model. We compare and contrast these models using a data set on closeness and time spent together from 201 couples where one partner is distinguished by stress associated with an upcoming professional exam. The models yield results that appear to give different interpretations of the data. We discuss situations in which each model may be preferred and invite relationship researchers to model relationship data using the statistical model that matches their conceptual framework, rather than using a rigid statistical methodology.

KW - Actor–partner interdependence model

KW - common fate model

KW - dyadic data

KW - dyadic score model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038852348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038852348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0265407517725407

DO - 10.1177/0265407517725407

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 59

EP - 88

JO - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

JF - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

SN - 0265-4075

IS - 1

ER -