Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors

Sarah Hamilton Dugan, Noah Silbert, Tara McAllister Byun, Jonathan L. Preston, Carolyn Sotto, Suzanne E. Boyce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study investigates category goodness judgments of /r/ in adults and children with and without residual speech errors (RSEs) using natural speech stimuli. Thirty adults, 38 children with RSE (ages 7–16) and 35 age-matched typically developing (TD) children provided category goodness judgments on whole words, recorded from 27 child speakers, with /r/ in various phonetic environments. The salient acoustic property of /r/ – the lowered third formant (F3) – was normalized in two ways. A logistic mixed-effect model quantified the relationships between listeners’ responses and the third formant frequency, vowel context and clinical group status. Goodness judgments from the adult group showed a statistically significant interaction with the F3 parameter when compared to both child groups (p < 0.001) using both normalization methods. The RSE group did not differ significantly from the TD group in judgments of /r/. All listeners were significantly more likely to judge /r/ as correct in a front-vowel context. Our results suggest that normalized /r/ F3 is a statistically significant predictor of category goodness judgments for both adults and children, but children do not appear to make adult-like judgments. Category goodness judgments do not have a clear relationship with /r/ production abilities in children with RSE. These findings may have implications for clinical activities that include category goodness judgments in natural speech, especially for recorded productions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalClinical Linguistics and Phonetics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 26 2018

Fingerprint

listener
Group
Phonetics
Aptitude
status group
Modeling
Sound
Goodness
normalization
phonetics
Acoustics
acoustics
stimulus
logistics
Speech Errors
ability
interaction
Listeners
Natural Speech
beryllium trifluoride

Keywords

  • speech acoustics
  • speech disorders
  • Speech perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors. / Dugan, Sarah Hamilton; Silbert, Noah; McAllister Byun, Tara; Preston, Jonathan L.; Sotto, Carolyn; Boyce, Suzanne E.

In: Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 26.05.2018, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dugan, Sarah Hamilton ; Silbert, Noah ; McAllister Byun, Tara ; Preston, Jonathan L. ; Sotto, Carolyn ; Boyce, Suzanne E. / Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors. In: Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. 2018 ; pp. 1-21.
@article{297fd835b7084b858a9b778a3c3fdeab,
title = "Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors",
abstract = "This study investigates category goodness judgments of /r/ in adults and children with and without residual speech errors (RSEs) using natural speech stimuli. Thirty adults, 38 children with RSE (ages 7–16) and 35 age-matched typically developing (TD) children provided category goodness judgments on whole words, recorded from 27 child speakers, with /r/ in various phonetic environments. The salient acoustic property of /r/ – the lowered third formant (F3) – was normalized in two ways. A logistic mixed-effect model quantified the relationships between listeners’ responses and the third formant frequency, vowel context and clinical group status. Goodness judgments from the adult group showed a statistically significant interaction with the F3 parameter when compared to both child groups (p < 0.001) using both normalization methods. The RSE group did not differ significantly from the TD group in judgments of /r/. All listeners were significantly more likely to judge /r/ as correct in a front-vowel context. Our results suggest that normalized /r/ F3 is a statistically significant predictor of category goodness judgments for both adults and children, but children do not appear to make adult-like judgments. Category goodness judgments do not have a clear relationship with /r/ production abilities in children with RSE. These findings may have implications for clinical activities that include category goodness judgments in natural speech, especially for recorded productions.",
keywords = "speech acoustics, speech disorders, Speech perception",
author = "Dugan, {Sarah Hamilton} and Noah Silbert and {McAllister Byun}, Tara and Preston, {Jonathan L.} and Carolyn Sotto and Boyce, {Suzanne E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1080/02699206.2018.1477834",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics",
issn = "0269-9206",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors

AU - Dugan, Sarah Hamilton

AU - Silbert, Noah

AU - McAllister Byun, Tara

AU - Preston, Jonathan L.

AU - Sotto, Carolyn

AU - Boyce, Suzanne E.

PY - 2018/5/26

Y1 - 2018/5/26

N2 - This study investigates category goodness judgments of /r/ in adults and children with and without residual speech errors (RSEs) using natural speech stimuli. Thirty adults, 38 children with RSE (ages 7–16) and 35 age-matched typically developing (TD) children provided category goodness judgments on whole words, recorded from 27 child speakers, with /r/ in various phonetic environments. The salient acoustic property of /r/ – the lowered third formant (F3) – was normalized in two ways. A logistic mixed-effect model quantified the relationships between listeners’ responses and the third formant frequency, vowel context and clinical group status. Goodness judgments from the adult group showed a statistically significant interaction with the F3 parameter when compared to both child groups (p < 0.001) using both normalization methods. The RSE group did not differ significantly from the TD group in judgments of /r/. All listeners were significantly more likely to judge /r/ as correct in a front-vowel context. Our results suggest that normalized /r/ F3 is a statistically significant predictor of category goodness judgments for both adults and children, but children do not appear to make adult-like judgments. Category goodness judgments do not have a clear relationship with /r/ production abilities in children with RSE. These findings may have implications for clinical activities that include category goodness judgments in natural speech, especially for recorded productions.

AB - This study investigates category goodness judgments of /r/ in adults and children with and without residual speech errors (RSEs) using natural speech stimuli. Thirty adults, 38 children with RSE (ages 7–16) and 35 age-matched typically developing (TD) children provided category goodness judgments on whole words, recorded from 27 child speakers, with /r/ in various phonetic environments. The salient acoustic property of /r/ – the lowered third formant (F3) – was normalized in two ways. A logistic mixed-effect model quantified the relationships between listeners’ responses and the third formant frequency, vowel context and clinical group status. Goodness judgments from the adult group showed a statistically significant interaction with the F3 parameter when compared to both child groups (p < 0.001) using both normalization methods. The RSE group did not differ significantly from the TD group in judgments of /r/. All listeners were significantly more likely to judge /r/ as correct in a front-vowel context. Our results suggest that normalized /r/ F3 is a statistically significant predictor of category goodness judgments for both adults and children, but children do not appear to make adult-like judgments. Category goodness judgments do not have a clear relationship with /r/ production abilities in children with RSE. These findings may have implications for clinical activities that include category goodness judgments in natural speech, especially for recorded productions.

KW - speech acoustics

KW - speech disorders

KW - Speech perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047426201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047426201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699206.2018.1477834

DO - 10.1080/02699206.2018.1477834

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

JF - Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

SN - 0269-9206

ER -