Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping - a systematic review

Valérie R. Louis, Revati Phalkey, Olaf Horstick, Pitcha Ratanawong, Annelies Wilder-Smith, Yesim Tozan, Peter Dambach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: The global spread and the increased frequency and magnitude of epidemic dengue in the last 50 years underscore the urgent need for effective tools for surveillance, prevention, and control. This review aims at providing a systematic overview of what predictors are critical and which spatial and spatio-temporal modeling approaches are useful in generating risk maps for dengue. Methods: A systematic search was undertaken, using the PubMed, Web of Science, WHOLIS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and OvidSP databases for published citations, without language or time restrictions. A manual search of the titles and abstracts was carried out using predefined criteria, notably the inclusion of dengue cases. Data were extracted for pre-identified variables, including the type of predictors and the type of modeling approach used for risk mapping. Results: A wide variety of both predictors and modeling approaches was used to create dengue risk maps. No specific patterns could be identified in the combination of predictors or models across studies. The most important and commonly used predictors for the category of demographic and socio-economic variables were age, gender, education, housing conditions and level of income. Among environmental variables, precipitation and air temperature were often significant predictors. Remote sensing provided a source of varied land cover data that could act as a proxy for other predictor categories. Descriptive maps showing dengue case hotspots were useful for identifying high-risk areas. Predictive maps based on more complex methodology facilitated advanced data analysis and visualization, but their applicability in public health contexts remains to be established. Conclusions: The majority of available dengue risk maps was descriptive and based on retrospective data. Availability of resources, feasibility of acquisition, quality of data, alongside available technical expertise, determines the accuracy of dengue risk maps and their applicability to the field of public health. A large number of unknowns, including effective entomological predictors, genetic diversity of circulating viruses, population serological profile, and human mobility, continue to pose challenges and to limit the ability to produce accurate and effective risk maps, and fail to support the development of early warning systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number50
JournalInternational Journal of Health Geographics
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 9 2014

Fingerprint

Dengue
Public health
Public Health
Disease control
Professional Competence
Data visualization
Alarm systems
Proxy
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Systematic review
Modeling
Predictors
Viruses
PubMed
Remote sensing
Language
Education
Air
Economics
Demography

Keywords

  • Dengue
  • Dengue control
  • GIS
  • Land cover
  • Prediction
  • Remote sensing
  • Risk mapping
  • Spatial
  • Surveillance
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Computer Science(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Louis, V. R., Phalkey, R., Horstick, O., Ratanawong, P., Wilder-Smith, A., Tozan, Y., & Dambach, P. (2014). Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping - a systematic review. International Journal of Health Geographics, 13(1), [50]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-13-50

Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping - a systematic review. / Louis, Valérie R.; Phalkey, Revati; Horstick, Olaf; Ratanawong, Pitcha; Wilder-Smith, Annelies; Tozan, Yesim; Dambach, Peter.

In: International Journal of Health Geographics, Vol. 13, No. 1, 50, 09.12.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Louis, VR, Phalkey, R, Horstick, O, Ratanawong, P, Wilder-Smith, A, Tozan, Y & Dambach, P 2014, 'Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping - a systematic review', International Journal of Health Geographics, vol. 13, no. 1, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-13-50
Louis, Valérie R. ; Phalkey, Revati ; Horstick, Olaf ; Ratanawong, Pitcha ; Wilder-Smith, Annelies ; Tozan, Yesim ; Dambach, Peter. / Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping - a systematic review. In: International Journal of Health Geographics. 2014 ; Vol. 13, No. 1.
@article{a98cc7ec77284980b8aa23236ca06ccc,
title = "Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping - a systematic review",
abstract = "Introduction: The global spread and the increased frequency and magnitude of epidemic dengue in the last 50 years underscore the urgent need for effective tools for surveillance, prevention, and control. This review aims at providing a systematic overview of what predictors are critical and which spatial and spatio-temporal modeling approaches are useful in generating risk maps for dengue. Methods: A systematic search was undertaken, using the PubMed, Web of Science, WHOLIS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and OvidSP databases for published citations, without language or time restrictions. A manual search of the titles and abstracts was carried out using predefined criteria, notably the inclusion of dengue cases. Data were extracted for pre-identified variables, including the type of predictors and the type of modeling approach used for risk mapping. Results: A wide variety of both predictors and modeling approaches was used to create dengue risk maps. No specific patterns could be identified in the combination of predictors or models across studies. The most important and commonly used predictors for the category of demographic and socio-economic variables were age, gender, education, housing conditions and level of income. Among environmental variables, precipitation and air temperature were often significant predictors. Remote sensing provided a source of varied land cover data that could act as a proxy for other predictor categories. Descriptive maps showing dengue case hotspots were useful for identifying high-risk areas. Predictive maps based on more complex methodology facilitated advanced data analysis and visualization, but their applicability in public health contexts remains to be established. Conclusions: The majority of available dengue risk maps was descriptive and based on retrospective data. Availability of resources, feasibility of acquisition, quality of data, alongside available technical expertise, determines the accuracy of dengue risk maps and their applicability to the field of public health. A large number of unknowns, including effective entomological predictors, genetic diversity of circulating viruses, population serological profile, and human mobility, continue to pose challenges and to limit the ability to produce accurate and effective risk maps, and fail to support the development of early warning systems.",
keywords = "Dengue, Dengue control, GIS, Land cover, Prediction, Remote sensing, Risk mapping, Spatial, Surveillance, Systematic review",
author = "Louis, {Val{\'e}rie R.} and Revati Phalkey and Olaf Horstick and Pitcha Ratanawong and Annelies Wilder-Smith and Yesim Tozan and Peter Dambach",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1186/1476-072X-13-50",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "International Journal of Health Geographics",
issn = "1476-072X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping - a systematic review

AU - Louis, Valérie R.

AU - Phalkey, Revati

AU - Horstick, Olaf

AU - Ratanawong, Pitcha

AU - Wilder-Smith, Annelies

AU - Tozan, Yesim

AU - Dambach, Peter

PY - 2014/12/9

Y1 - 2014/12/9

N2 - Introduction: The global spread and the increased frequency and magnitude of epidemic dengue in the last 50 years underscore the urgent need for effective tools for surveillance, prevention, and control. This review aims at providing a systematic overview of what predictors are critical and which spatial and spatio-temporal modeling approaches are useful in generating risk maps for dengue. Methods: A systematic search was undertaken, using the PubMed, Web of Science, WHOLIS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and OvidSP databases for published citations, without language or time restrictions. A manual search of the titles and abstracts was carried out using predefined criteria, notably the inclusion of dengue cases. Data were extracted for pre-identified variables, including the type of predictors and the type of modeling approach used for risk mapping. Results: A wide variety of both predictors and modeling approaches was used to create dengue risk maps. No specific patterns could be identified in the combination of predictors or models across studies. The most important and commonly used predictors for the category of demographic and socio-economic variables were age, gender, education, housing conditions and level of income. Among environmental variables, precipitation and air temperature were often significant predictors. Remote sensing provided a source of varied land cover data that could act as a proxy for other predictor categories. Descriptive maps showing dengue case hotspots were useful for identifying high-risk areas. Predictive maps based on more complex methodology facilitated advanced data analysis and visualization, but their applicability in public health contexts remains to be established. Conclusions: The majority of available dengue risk maps was descriptive and based on retrospective data. Availability of resources, feasibility of acquisition, quality of data, alongside available technical expertise, determines the accuracy of dengue risk maps and their applicability to the field of public health. A large number of unknowns, including effective entomological predictors, genetic diversity of circulating viruses, population serological profile, and human mobility, continue to pose challenges and to limit the ability to produce accurate and effective risk maps, and fail to support the development of early warning systems.

AB - Introduction: The global spread and the increased frequency and magnitude of epidemic dengue in the last 50 years underscore the urgent need for effective tools for surveillance, prevention, and control. This review aims at providing a systematic overview of what predictors are critical and which spatial and spatio-temporal modeling approaches are useful in generating risk maps for dengue. Methods: A systematic search was undertaken, using the PubMed, Web of Science, WHOLIS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and OvidSP databases for published citations, without language or time restrictions. A manual search of the titles and abstracts was carried out using predefined criteria, notably the inclusion of dengue cases. Data were extracted for pre-identified variables, including the type of predictors and the type of modeling approach used for risk mapping. Results: A wide variety of both predictors and modeling approaches was used to create dengue risk maps. No specific patterns could be identified in the combination of predictors or models across studies. The most important and commonly used predictors for the category of demographic and socio-economic variables were age, gender, education, housing conditions and level of income. Among environmental variables, precipitation and air temperature were often significant predictors. Remote sensing provided a source of varied land cover data that could act as a proxy for other predictor categories. Descriptive maps showing dengue case hotspots were useful for identifying high-risk areas. Predictive maps based on more complex methodology facilitated advanced data analysis and visualization, but their applicability in public health contexts remains to be established. Conclusions: The majority of available dengue risk maps was descriptive and based on retrospective data. Availability of resources, feasibility of acquisition, quality of data, alongside available technical expertise, determines the accuracy of dengue risk maps and their applicability to the field of public health. A large number of unknowns, including effective entomological predictors, genetic diversity of circulating viruses, population serological profile, and human mobility, continue to pose challenges and to limit the ability to produce accurate and effective risk maps, and fail to support the development of early warning systems.

KW - Dengue

KW - Dengue control

KW - GIS

KW - Land cover

KW - Prediction

KW - Remote sensing

KW - Risk mapping

KW - Spatial

KW - Surveillance

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924869057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924869057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1476-072X-13-50

DO - 10.1186/1476-072X-13-50

M3 - Article

C2 - 25487167

AN - SCOPUS:84924869057

VL - 13

JO - International Journal of Health Geographics

JF - International Journal of Health Geographics

SN - 1476-072X

IS - 1

M1 - 50

ER -