Modeling the apparent frequency-specific suppression in simple cell responses

Oscar Nestares, David J. Heeger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Simple cells in cat striate cortex are selective for spatial frequency. It is widely believed that this selectivity arises simply because of the way in which the neurons sum inputs from the lateral geniculate nucleus. Alternate models, however, advocate the need for frequency-specific inhibitory mechanisms to refine the spatial frequency selectivity. Indeed, simple cell responses are often suppressed by superimposing stimuli with spatial frequencies that flank the neuron's preferred spatial frequency. In this article, we compare two models of simple cell responses head-to-head. One of these models, the flanking-suppression model, includes an inhibitory mechanism that is specific to frequencies that flank the neuron's preferred spatial frequency. The other model, the nonspecific-suppression model, includes a suppressive mechanism that is very broadly tuned for spatial frequency. Both models also include a rectification nonlinearity and both may include an additional accelerating (e.g., squaring) output nonlinearity. We demonstrate that both models can be consistent with the apparent flanking suppression. However, based on other experimental results, we argue that the nonspecific-suppression model is more plausible. We conclude that the suppression is probably broadly tuned for spatial frequency and that the apparent flanking suppression is actually due to distortions introduced by an accelerating output nonlinearity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1535-1543
Number of pages9
JournalVision Research
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1997

Fingerprint

Neurons
Geniculate Bodies
Visual Cortex
Cats

Keywords

  • Contrast normalization
  • Simple cell
  • Spatial frequency
  • Striate cortex
  • Suppression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Modeling the apparent frequency-specific suppression in simple cell responses. / Nestares, Oscar; Heeger, David J.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 37, No. 11, 06.1997, p. 1535-1543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e34025192fd64f65ad5c5117a087487b,
title = "Modeling the apparent frequency-specific suppression in simple cell responses",
abstract = "Simple cells in cat striate cortex are selective for spatial frequency. It is widely believed that this selectivity arises simply because of the way in which the neurons sum inputs from the lateral geniculate nucleus. Alternate models, however, advocate the need for frequency-specific inhibitory mechanisms to refine the spatial frequency selectivity. Indeed, simple cell responses are often suppressed by superimposing stimuli with spatial frequencies that flank the neuron's preferred spatial frequency. In this article, we compare two models of simple cell responses head-to-head. One of these models, the flanking-suppression model, includes an inhibitory mechanism that is specific to frequencies that flank the neuron's preferred spatial frequency. The other model, the nonspecific-suppression model, includes a suppressive mechanism that is very broadly tuned for spatial frequency. Both models also include a rectification nonlinearity and both may include an additional accelerating (e.g., squaring) output nonlinearity. We demonstrate that both models can be consistent with the apparent flanking suppression. However, based on other experimental results, we argue that the nonspecific-suppression model is more plausible. We conclude that the suppression is probably broadly tuned for spatial frequency and that the apparent flanking suppression is actually due to distortions introduced by an accelerating output nonlinearity.",
keywords = "Contrast normalization, Simple cell, Spatial frequency, Striate cortex, Suppression",
author = "Oscar Nestares and Heeger, {David J.}",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00268-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1535--1543",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling the apparent frequency-specific suppression in simple cell responses

AU - Nestares, Oscar

AU - Heeger, David J.

PY - 1997/6

Y1 - 1997/6

N2 - Simple cells in cat striate cortex are selective for spatial frequency. It is widely believed that this selectivity arises simply because of the way in which the neurons sum inputs from the lateral geniculate nucleus. Alternate models, however, advocate the need for frequency-specific inhibitory mechanisms to refine the spatial frequency selectivity. Indeed, simple cell responses are often suppressed by superimposing stimuli with spatial frequencies that flank the neuron's preferred spatial frequency. In this article, we compare two models of simple cell responses head-to-head. One of these models, the flanking-suppression model, includes an inhibitory mechanism that is specific to frequencies that flank the neuron's preferred spatial frequency. The other model, the nonspecific-suppression model, includes a suppressive mechanism that is very broadly tuned for spatial frequency. Both models also include a rectification nonlinearity and both may include an additional accelerating (e.g., squaring) output nonlinearity. We demonstrate that both models can be consistent with the apparent flanking suppression. However, based on other experimental results, we argue that the nonspecific-suppression model is more plausible. We conclude that the suppression is probably broadly tuned for spatial frequency and that the apparent flanking suppression is actually due to distortions introduced by an accelerating output nonlinearity.

AB - Simple cells in cat striate cortex are selective for spatial frequency. It is widely believed that this selectivity arises simply because of the way in which the neurons sum inputs from the lateral geniculate nucleus. Alternate models, however, advocate the need for frequency-specific inhibitory mechanisms to refine the spatial frequency selectivity. Indeed, simple cell responses are often suppressed by superimposing stimuli with spatial frequencies that flank the neuron's preferred spatial frequency. In this article, we compare two models of simple cell responses head-to-head. One of these models, the flanking-suppression model, includes an inhibitory mechanism that is specific to frequencies that flank the neuron's preferred spatial frequency. The other model, the nonspecific-suppression model, includes a suppressive mechanism that is very broadly tuned for spatial frequency. Both models also include a rectification nonlinearity and both may include an additional accelerating (e.g., squaring) output nonlinearity. We demonstrate that both models can be consistent with the apparent flanking suppression. However, based on other experimental results, we argue that the nonspecific-suppression model is more plausible. We conclude that the suppression is probably broadly tuned for spatial frequency and that the apparent flanking suppression is actually due to distortions introduced by an accelerating output nonlinearity.

KW - Contrast normalization

KW - Simple cell

KW - Spatial frequency

KW - Striate cortex

KW - Suppression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030988240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030988240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00268-4

DO - 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00268-4

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 1535

EP - 1543

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 11

ER -