Mobile phone use patterns and preferences in safety net office-based Buprenorphine patients

Babak Tofighi, Ellie Grossman, Emily Buirkle, Jennifer McNeely, Marc Gourevitch, Joshua Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Integrating mobile phone technologies in addiction treatment is of increasing importance and may optimize patient engagement with their care and enhance the delivery of existing treatment strategies. Few studies have evaluated mobile phone and text message (TM) use patterns in persons enrolled in addiction treatment, and none have assessed the use in safety net, office-based buprenorphine practices. Methods: A 28-item, quantitative and qualitative semistructured survey was administered to opiate-dependent adults in an urban, publicly funded, office-based buprenorphine program. Survey domains included demographic characteristics, mobile phone and TMuse patterns, and preferences pertaining to their recovery. Results: Surveyors approached 73 of the 155 eligible subjects (47%); 71 respondents completed the survey. Nearly all participants reported mobile phone ownership (93%) andTMuse (93%), and most reported "very much" or "somewhat" comfort sending TM (79%). Text message contact with 12-step group sponsors, friends, family members, and counselors was also described (32%). Nearly all preferred having their providers' mobile phone number (94%), and alerting the clinic via TM in the event of a potential relapse to receive both supportive TM and a phone call from their buprenorphine provider was also well received (62%). Conclusions: Mobile phone and TM use patterns and preferences among this sample of office-based buprenorphine participants highlight the potential of adopting patient-centered mobile phone-basedinterventions in this treatment setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-221
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Addiction Medicine
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Buprenorphine
Cell Phones
Text Messaging
Safety
Opiate Alkaloids
Patient Participation
Ownership
Therapeutics
Demography
Technology
Recurrence
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • buprenorphine
  • mobile phone
  • opioid replacement therapies
  • text message

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Mobile phone use patterns and preferences in safety net office-based Buprenorphine patients. / Tofighi, Babak; Grossman, Ellie; Buirkle, Emily; McNeely, Jennifer; Gourevitch, Marc; Lee, Joshua.

In: Journal of Addiction Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 3, 01.05.2015, p. 217-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tofighi, Babak ; Grossman, Ellie ; Buirkle, Emily ; McNeely, Jennifer ; Gourevitch, Marc ; Lee, Joshua. / Mobile phone use patterns and preferences in safety net office-based Buprenorphine patients. In: Journal of Addiction Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 217-221.
@article{947d3760739045fbafa8f0d148f0c594,
title = "Mobile phone use patterns and preferences in safety net office-based Buprenorphine patients",
abstract = "Background: Integrating mobile phone technologies in addiction treatment is of increasing importance and may optimize patient engagement with their care and enhance the delivery of existing treatment strategies. Few studies have evaluated mobile phone and text message (TM) use patterns in persons enrolled in addiction treatment, and none have assessed the use in safety net, office-based buprenorphine practices. Methods: A 28-item, quantitative and qualitative semistructured survey was administered to opiate-dependent adults in an urban, publicly funded, office-based buprenorphine program. Survey domains included demographic characteristics, mobile phone and TMuse patterns, and preferences pertaining to their recovery. Results: Surveyors approached 73 of the 155 eligible subjects (47{\%}); 71 respondents completed the survey. Nearly all participants reported mobile phone ownership (93{\%}) andTMuse (93{\%}), and most reported {"}very much{"} or {"}somewhat{"} comfort sending TM (79{\%}). Text message contact with 12-step group sponsors, friends, family members, and counselors was also described (32{\%}). Nearly all preferred having their providers' mobile phone number (94{\%}), and alerting the clinic via TM in the event of a potential relapse to receive both supportive TM and a phone call from their buprenorphine provider was also well received (62{\%}). Conclusions: Mobile phone and TM use patterns and preferences among this sample of office-based buprenorphine participants highlight the potential of adopting patient-centered mobile phone-basedinterventions in this treatment setting.",
keywords = "buprenorphine, mobile phone, opioid replacement therapies, text message",
author = "Babak Tofighi and Ellie Grossman and Emily Buirkle and Jennifer McNeely and Marc Gourevitch and Joshua Lee",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ADM.0000000000000121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "217--221",
journal = "Journal of Addiction Medicine",
issn = "1932-0620",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobile phone use patterns and preferences in safety net office-based Buprenorphine patients

AU - Tofighi, Babak

AU - Grossman, Ellie

AU - Buirkle, Emily

AU - McNeely, Jennifer

AU - Gourevitch, Marc

AU - Lee, Joshua

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Background: Integrating mobile phone technologies in addiction treatment is of increasing importance and may optimize patient engagement with their care and enhance the delivery of existing treatment strategies. Few studies have evaluated mobile phone and text message (TM) use patterns in persons enrolled in addiction treatment, and none have assessed the use in safety net, office-based buprenorphine practices. Methods: A 28-item, quantitative and qualitative semistructured survey was administered to opiate-dependent adults in an urban, publicly funded, office-based buprenorphine program. Survey domains included demographic characteristics, mobile phone and TMuse patterns, and preferences pertaining to their recovery. Results: Surveyors approached 73 of the 155 eligible subjects (47%); 71 respondents completed the survey. Nearly all participants reported mobile phone ownership (93%) andTMuse (93%), and most reported "very much" or "somewhat" comfort sending TM (79%). Text message contact with 12-step group sponsors, friends, family members, and counselors was also described (32%). Nearly all preferred having their providers' mobile phone number (94%), and alerting the clinic via TM in the event of a potential relapse to receive both supportive TM and a phone call from their buprenorphine provider was also well received (62%). Conclusions: Mobile phone and TM use patterns and preferences among this sample of office-based buprenorphine participants highlight the potential of adopting patient-centered mobile phone-basedinterventions in this treatment setting.

AB - Background: Integrating mobile phone technologies in addiction treatment is of increasing importance and may optimize patient engagement with their care and enhance the delivery of existing treatment strategies. Few studies have evaluated mobile phone and text message (TM) use patterns in persons enrolled in addiction treatment, and none have assessed the use in safety net, office-based buprenorphine practices. Methods: A 28-item, quantitative and qualitative semistructured survey was administered to opiate-dependent adults in an urban, publicly funded, office-based buprenorphine program. Survey domains included demographic characteristics, mobile phone and TMuse patterns, and preferences pertaining to their recovery. Results: Surveyors approached 73 of the 155 eligible subjects (47%); 71 respondents completed the survey. Nearly all participants reported mobile phone ownership (93%) andTMuse (93%), and most reported "very much" or "somewhat" comfort sending TM (79%). Text message contact with 12-step group sponsors, friends, family members, and counselors was also described (32%). Nearly all preferred having their providers' mobile phone number (94%), and alerting the clinic via TM in the event of a potential relapse to receive both supportive TM and a phone call from their buprenorphine provider was also well received (62%). Conclusions: Mobile phone and TM use patterns and preferences among this sample of office-based buprenorphine participants highlight the potential of adopting patient-centered mobile phone-basedinterventions in this treatment setting.

KW - buprenorphine

KW - mobile phone

KW - opioid replacement therapies

KW - text message

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942803632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942803632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000121

DO - 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000121

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 217

EP - 221

JO - Journal of Addiction Medicine

JF - Journal of Addiction Medicine

SN - 1932-0620

IS - 3

ER -