Mixed methods in research on child well-being

M. Clara Barata, Hirokazu Yoshikawa

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In this chapter we review the benefits of using mixed qualitative/quantitative methods for research on child well-being. We argue that the combination of quantitative and qualitative modes of inquiry can often enrich our understanding of child development and well-being substantially beyond what either mode offers alone. We offer three case examples - the study of contextual influences on child development, including interventions; the study of reciprocal relationships between parent and child characteristics and contextual characteristics; and the study of children’s health - in which the integration of these methods has usefully informed developmental science and influenced child well-being. We also discuss some of the challenges and obstacles to the use of mixed methods on child well-being, and the solutions to some of these challenges. First, the design of mixed-methods studies often requires some additional effort and planning in research design, sampling, and data collection. Second, mixed-methods research offers some challenges to research participants’ engagement and involvement. Third, after data collection is over, mixed-methods research can generate data that may require boundary-crossing analyses to integrate and summarize. Finally, when the study reaches the writing stage, there can be difficulties in locating appropriate publishing outlets. We review solutions to these challenges based on evidence from prior successful mixed-methods studies in this field. In the conclusion, we offer future directions in the application of mixed methods in research on child well-being.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Child Well-Being
Subtitle of host publicationTheories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
Pages2879-2893
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9789048190638
ISBN (Print)9789048190621
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

child well-being
quantitative method
qualitative method
research planning
parents
well-being
planning
science
health
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Barata, M. C., & Yoshikawa, H. (2014). Mixed methods in research on child well-being. In Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective (pp. 2879-2893). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_114

Mixed methods in research on child well-being. / Barata, M. Clara; Yoshikawa, Hirokazu.

Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective. Springer Netherlands, 2014. p. 2879-2893.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Barata, MC & Yoshikawa, H 2014, Mixed methods in research on child well-being. in Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective. Springer Netherlands, pp. 2879-2893. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_114
Barata MC, Yoshikawa H. Mixed methods in research on child well-being. In Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective. Springer Netherlands. 2014. p. 2879-2893 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_114
Barata, M. Clara ; Yoshikawa, Hirokazu. / Mixed methods in research on child well-being. Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective. Springer Netherlands, 2014. pp. 2879-2893
@inbook{37b6c528124b43d186ef22afd2069a46,
title = "Mixed methods in research on child well-being",
abstract = "In this chapter we review the benefits of using mixed qualitative/quantitative methods for research on child well-being. We argue that the combination of quantitative and qualitative modes of inquiry can often enrich our understanding of child development and well-being substantially beyond what either mode offers alone. We offer three case examples - the study of contextual influences on child development, including interventions; the study of reciprocal relationships between parent and child characteristics and contextual characteristics; and the study of children’s health - in which the integration of these methods has usefully informed developmental science and influenced child well-being. We also discuss some of the challenges and obstacles to the use of mixed methods on child well-being, and the solutions to some of these challenges. First, the design of mixed-methods studies often requires some additional effort and planning in research design, sampling, and data collection. Second, mixed-methods research offers some challenges to research participants’ engagement and involvement. Third, after data collection is over, mixed-methods research can generate data that may require boundary-crossing analyses to integrate and summarize. Finally, when the study reaches the writing stage, there can be difficulties in locating appropriate publishing outlets. We review solutions to these challenges based on evidence from prior successful mixed-methods studies in this field. In the conclusion, we offer future directions in the application of mixed methods in research on child well-being.",
author = "Barata, {M. Clara} and Hirokazu Yoshikawa",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_114",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9789048190621",
pages = "2879--2893",
booktitle = "Handbook of Child Well-Being",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
address = "Netherlands",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Mixed methods in research on child well-being

AU - Barata, M. Clara

AU - Yoshikawa, Hirokazu

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - In this chapter we review the benefits of using mixed qualitative/quantitative methods for research on child well-being. We argue that the combination of quantitative and qualitative modes of inquiry can often enrich our understanding of child development and well-being substantially beyond what either mode offers alone. We offer three case examples - the study of contextual influences on child development, including interventions; the study of reciprocal relationships between parent and child characteristics and contextual characteristics; and the study of children’s health - in which the integration of these methods has usefully informed developmental science and influenced child well-being. We also discuss some of the challenges and obstacles to the use of mixed methods on child well-being, and the solutions to some of these challenges. First, the design of mixed-methods studies often requires some additional effort and planning in research design, sampling, and data collection. Second, mixed-methods research offers some challenges to research participants’ engagement and involvement. Third, after data collection is over, mixed-methods research can generate data that may require boundary-crossing analyses to integrate and summarize. Finally, when the study reaches the writing stage, there can be difficulties in locating appropriate publishing outlets. We review solutions to these challenges based on evidence from prior successful mixed-methods studies in this field. In the conclusion, we offer future directions in the application of mixed methods in research on child well-being.

AB - In this chapter we review the benefits of using mixed qualitative/quantitative methods for research on child well-being. We argue that the combination of quantitative and qualitative modes of inquiry can often enrich our understanding of child development and well-being substantially beyond what either mode offers alone. We offer three case examples - the study of contextual influences on child development, including interventions; the study of reciprocal relationships between parent and child characteristics and contextual characteristics; and the study of children’s health - in which the integration of these methods has usefully informed developmental science and influenced child well-being. We also discuss some of the challenges and obstacles to the use of mixed methods on child well-being, and the solutions to some of these challenges. First, the design of mixed-methods studies often requires some additional effort and planning in research design, sampling, and data collection. Second, mixed-methods research offers some challenges to research participants’ engagement and involvement. Third, after data collection is over, mixed-methods research can generate data that may require boundary-crossing analyses to integrate and summarize. Finally, when the study reaches the writing stage, there can be difficulties in locating appropriate publishing outlets. We review solutions to these challenges based on evidence from prior successful mixed-methods studies in this field. In the conclusion, we offer future directions in the application of mixed methods in research on child well-being.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040604505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040604505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_114

DO - 10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_114

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789048190621

SP - 2879

EP - 2893

BT - Handbook of Child Well-Being

PB - Springer Netherlands

ER -