Missing in (Collective) Action: Ideology, System Justification, and the Motivational Antecedents of Two Types of Protest Behavior

John Jost, Julia Becker, Danny Osborne, Vivienne Badaan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social-psychological models of collective action emphasize three antecedents of protest: (a) anger at perceived injustice, (b) social identification, and (c) beliefs about group efficacy. These models are extremely useful but have rarely incorporated ideological factors—despite the fact that protests occur in societal contexts in which some people are motivated to defend and bolster the status quo whereas others are motivated to challenge and oppose it. We adopt a system-justification perspective to specify when individuals and groups will—and will not—experience moral outrage and whether such outrage will be directed at defenders versus critics of the status quo. We describe evidence that epistemic, existential, and relational needs for certainty, security, and affiliation undermine support for system-challenging protests by increasing system-defensive motivation. We also discuss system-based emotions and backlash against protestors and propose an integrated model of collective action that paves the way for more comprehensive research on the psychological antecedents of social change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-108
Number of pages10
JournalCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Psychological Models
Social Identification
Anger
Social Change
Motivation
Emotions
Psychology
Research
Protest
Ideology
Collective Action
Justification
Psychological
Outrage

Keywords

  • collective action
  • ideology
  • moral outrage
  • protest
  • system justification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Missing in (Collective) Action : Ideology, System Justification, and the Motivational Antecedents of Two Types of Protest Behavior. / Jost, John; Becker, Julia; Osborne, Danny; Badaan, Vivienne.

In: Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 26, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 99-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b4628427813a4cc4aa8394c7cca786fe,
title = "Missing in (Collective) Action: Ideology, System Justification, and the Motivational Antecedents of Two Types of Protest Behavior",
abstract = "Social-psychological models of collective action emphasize three antecedents of protest: (a) anger at perceived injustice, (b) social identification, and (c) beliefs about group efficacy. These models are extremely useful but have rarely incorporated ideological factors—despite the fact that protests occur in societal contexts in which some people are motivated to defend and bolster the status quo whereas others are motivated to challenge and oppose it. We adopt a system-justification perspective to specify when individuals and groups will—and will not—experience moral outrage and whether such outrage will be directed at defenders versus critics of the status quo. We describe evidence that epistemic, existential, and relational needs for certainty, security, and affiliation undermine support for system-challenging protests by increasing system-defensive motivation. We also discuss system-based emotions and backlash against protestors and propose an integrated model of collective action that paves the way for more comprehensive research on the psychological antecedents of social change.",
keywords = "collective action, ideology, moral outrage, protest, system justification",
author = "John Jost and Julia Becker and Danny Osborne and Vivienne Badaan",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0963721417690633",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "99--108",
journal = "Current Directions in Psychological Science",
issn = "0963-7214",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing in (Collective) Action

T2 - Ideology, System Justification, and the Motivational Antecedents of Two Types of Protest Behavior

AU - Jost, John

AU - Becker, Julia

AU - Osborne, Danny

AU - Badaan, Vivienne

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Social-psychological models of collective action emphasize three antecedents of protest: (a) anger at perceived injustice, (b) social identification, and (c) beliefs about group efficacy. These models are extremely useful but have rarely incorporated ideological factors—despite the fact that protests occur in societal contexts in which some people are motivated to defend and bolster the status quo whereas others are motivated to challenge and oppose it. We adopt a system-justification perspective to specify when individuals and groups will—and will not—experience moral outrage and whether such outrage will be directed at defenders versus critics of the status quo. We describe evidence that epistemic, existential, and relational needs for certainty, security, and affiliation undermine support for system-challenging protests by increasing system-defensive motivation. We also discuss system-based emotions and backlash against protestors and propose an integrated model of collective action that paves the way for more comprehensive research on the psychological antecedents of social change.

AB - Social-psychological models of collective action emphasize three antecedents of protest: (a) anger at perceived injustice, (b) social identification, and (c) beliefs about group efficacy. These models are extremely useful but have rarely incorporated ideological factors—despite the fact that protests occur in societal contexts in which some people are motivated to defend and bolster the status quo whereas others are motivated to challenge and oppose it. We adopt a system-justification perspective to specify when individuals and groups will—and will not—experience moral outrage and whether such outrage will be directed at defenders versus critics of the status quo. We describe evidence that epistemic, existential, and relational needs for certainty, security, and affiliation undermine support for system-challenging protests by increasing system-defensive motivation. We also discuss system-based emotions and backlash against protestors and propose an integrated model of collective action that paves the way for more comprehensive research on the psychological antecedents of social change.

KW - collective action

KW - ideology

KW - moral outrage

KW - protest

KW - system justification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018773167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018773167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0963721417690633

DO - 10.1177/0963721417690633

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018773167

VL - 26

SP - 99

EP - 108

JO - Current Directions in Psychological Science

JF - Current Directions in Psychological Science

SN - 0963-7214

IS - 2

ER -