Minorities and mistrust: On the adoption of ethnic recognition to manage conflict

Elisabeth King, Cyrus Samii

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

An enduring debate in the conflict management literature concerns the wisdom of recognizing versus avoiding reference to ethnic identities in institutions to manage ethnic conflict. Understanding why ethnic recognition occurs is crucial for informing this debate. We develop a theory based on functional and political mobilization effects of recognizing ethnic groups. Contrary to reasoning that minority leaders would be most interested in recognition, the theory suggests that recognition consistently favors the interests of leaders from larger, plurality groups, whereas minority leaders face a ‘dilemma of recognition’ between functional gains and mobilization threats. We use mixed methods to test our theory. For our quantitative analysis, we draw on an original coding of recognition in constitutions and comprehensive political settlements from 1990 to 2012. We find that for cases with leaders from plurality groups, recognition is adopted 60% of the time. With leaders from minority groups, the rate is about 40 percentage points lower, even after accounting for many background factors. Additional quantitative tests and a qualitative analysis present more detailed evidence to show that the processes correspond to the logic of our theory. Answering these questions about when and why recognition is adopted is a crucial step in evaluating its effects on conflict.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Peace Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

minority
leader
Chemical analysis
mobilization
test theory
Group
conflict management
ethnic conflict
ethnic identity
wisdom
coding
constitution
ethnic group
threat
evidence

Keywords

  • ethnic conflict
  • ethnic identity
  • identity politics
  • minority rights
  • peace agreements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Minorities and mistrust : On the adoption of ethnic recognition to manage conflict. / King, Elisabeth; Samii, Cyrus.

In: Journal of Peace Research, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{79bbf5c208a5495682c4e74b5fdcab81,
title = "Minorities and mistrust: On the adoption of ethnic recognition to manage conflict",
abstract = "An enduring debate in the conflict management literature concerns the wisdom of recognizing versus avoiding reference to ethnic identities in institutions to manage ethnic conflict. Understanding why ethnic recognition occurs is crucial for informing this debate. We develop a theory based on functional and political mobilization effects of recognizing ethnic groups. Contrary to reasoning that minority leaders would be most interested in recognition, the theory suggests that recognition consistently favors the interests of leaders from larger, plurality groups, whereas minority leaders face a ‘dilemma of recognition’ between functional gains and mobilization threats. We use mixed methods to test our theory. For our quantitative analysis, we draw on an original coding of recognition in constitutions and comprehensive political settlements from 1990 to 2012. We find that for cases with leaders from plurality groups, recognition is adopted 60{\%} of the time. With leaders from minority groups, the rate is about 40 percentage points lower, even after accounting for many background factors. Additional quantitative tests and a qualitative analysis present more detailed evidence to show that the processes correspond to the logic of our theory. Answering these questions about when and why recognition is adopted is a crucial step in evaluating its effects on conflict.",
keywords = "ethnic conflict, ethnic identity, identity politics, minority rights, peace agreements",
author = "Elisabeth King and Cyrus Samii",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022343317707803",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Peace Research",
issn = "0022-3433",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minorities and mistrust

T2 - On the adoption of ethnic recognition to manage conflict

AU - King, Elisabeth

AU - Samii, Cyrus

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - An enduring debate in the conflict management literature concerns the wisdom of recognizing versus avoiding reference to ethnic identities in institutions to manage ethnic conflict. Understanding why ethnic recognition occurs is crucial for informing this debate. We develop a theory based on functional and political mobilization effects of recognizing ethnic groups. Contrary to reasoning that minority leaders would be most interested in recognition, the theory suggests that recognition consistently favors the interests of leaders from larger, plurality groups, whereas minority leaders face a ‘dilemma of recognition’ between functional gains and mobilization threats. We use mixed methods to test our theory. For our quantitative analysis, we draw on an original coding of recognition in constitutions and comprehensive political settlements from 1990 to 2012. We find that for cases with leaders from plurality groups, recognition is adopted 60% of the time. With leaders from minority groups, the rate is about 40 percentage points lower, even after accounting for many background factors. Additional quantitative tests and a qualitative analysis present more detailed evidence to show that the processes correspond to the logic of our theory. Answering these questions about when and why recognition is adopted is a crucial step in evaluating its effects on conflict.

AB - An enduring debate in the conflict management literature concerns the wisdom of recognizing versus avoiding reference to ethnic identities in institutions to manage ethnic conflict. Understanding why ethnic recognition occurs is crucial for informing this debate. We develop a theory based on functional and political mobilization effects of recognizing ethnic groups. Contrary to reasoning that minority leaders would be most interested in recognition, the theory suggests that recognition consistently favors the interests of leaders from larger, plurality groups, whereas minority leaders face a ‘dilemma of recognition’ between functional gains and mobilization threats. We use mixed methods to test our theory. For our quantitative analysis, we draw on an original coding of recognition in constitutions and comprehensive political settlements from 1990 to 2012. We find that for cases with leaders from plurality groups, recognition is adopted 60% of the time. With leaders from minority groups, the rate is about 40 percentage points lower, even after accounting for many background factors. Additional quantitative tests and a qualitative analysis present more detailed evidence to show that the processes correspond to the logic of our theory. Answering these questions about when and why recognition is adopted is a crucial step in evaluating its effects on conflict.

KW - ethnic conflict

KW - ethnic identity

KW - identity politics

KW - minority rights

KW - peace agreements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042209415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042209415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022343317707803

DO - 10.1177/0022343317707803

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042209415

JO - Journal of Peace Research

JF - Journal of Peace Research

SN - 0022-3433

ER -