Minimal models for precipitating turbulent convection

Gerardo Hernandez-Duenas, Andrew J. Majda, Leslie M. Smith, Samuel N. Stechmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Simulations of precipitating convection would typically use a non-Boussinesq dynamical core such as the anelastic equations, and would incorporate water substance in all of its phases: vapour, liquid and ice. Furthermore, the liquid water phase would be separated into cloud water (small droplets suspended in air) and rain water (larger droplets that fall). Depending on environmental conditions, the moist convection may organize itself on multiple length and time scales. Here we investigate the question, what is the minimal representation of water substance and dynamics that still reproduces the basic regimes of turbulent convective organization? The simplified models investigated here use a Boussinesq atmosphere with bulk cloud physics involving equations for water vapour and rain water only. As a first test of the minimal models, we investigate organization or lack thereof on relatively small length scales of approximately 100 km and time scales of a few days. It is demonstrated that the minimal models produce either unorganized ('scattered') or organized convection in appropriate environmental conditions, depending on the environmental wind shear. For the case of organized convection, the models qualitatively capture features of propagating squall lines that are observed in nature and in more comprehensive cloud resolving models, such as tilted rain water profiles, low-altitude cold pools and propagation speed corresponding to the maximum of the horizontally averaged, horizontal velocity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)576-611
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of Fluid Mechanics
Volume717
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

convection
rain
water
Water
Rain
cloud physics
wind shear
low altitude
Liquids
liquids
Convection
Water vapor
Ice
water vapor
ice
Physics
Vapors
vapor phases
atmospheres
propagation

Keywords

  • geophysical and geological flows
  • moist convection
  • turbulent flows

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Minimal models for precipitating turbulent convection. / Hernandez-Duenas, Gerardo; Majda, Andrew J.; Smith, Leslie M.; Stechmann, Samuel N.

In: Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 717, 02.2013, p. 576-611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hernandez-Duenas, Gerardo ; Majda, Andrew J. ; Smith, Leslie M. ; Stechmann, Samuel N. / Minimal models for precipitating turbulent convection. In: Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2013 ; Vol. 717. pp. 576-611.
@article{6dc8a38f532a4747b56cc85dcd9dac0d,
title = "Minimal models for precipitating turbulent convection",
abstract = "Simulations of precipitating convection would typically use a non-Boussinesq dynamical core such as the anelastic equations, and would incorporate water substance in all of its phases: vapour, liquid and ice. Furthermore, the liquid water phase would be separated into cloud water (small droplets suspended in air) and rain water (larger droplets that fall). Depending on environmental conditions, the moist convection may organize itself on multiple length and time scales. Here we investigate the question, what is the minimal representation of water substance and dynamics that still reproduces the basic regimes of turbulent convective organization? The simplified models investigated here use a Boussinesq atmosphere with bulk cloud physics involving equations for water vapour and rain water only. As a first test of the minimal models, we investigate organization or lack thereof on relatively small length scales of approximately 100 km and time scales of a few days. It is demonstrated that the minimal models produce either unorganized ('scattered') or organized convection in appropriate environmental conditions, depending on the environmental wind shear. For the case of organized convection, the models qualitatively capture features of propagating squall lines that are observed in nature and in more comprehensive cloud resolving models, such as tilted rain water profiles, low-altitude cold pools and propagation speed corresponding to the maximum of the horizontally averaged, horizontal velocity.",
keywords = "geophysical and geological flows, moist convection, turbulent flows",
author = "Gerardo Hernandez-Duenas and Majda, {Andrew J.} and Smith, {Leslie M.} and Stechmann, {Samuel N.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1017/jfm.2012.597",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "717",
pages = "576--611",
journal = "Journal of Fluid Mechanics",
issn = "0022-1120",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimal models for precipitating turbulent convection

AU - Hernandez-Duenas, Gerardo

AU - Majda, Andrew J.

AU - Smith, Leslie M.

AU - Stechmann, Samuel N.

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Simulations of precipitating convection would typically use a non-Boussinesq dynamical core such as the anelastic equations, and would incorporate water substance in all of its phases: vapour, liquid and ice. Furthermore, the liquid water phase would be separated into cloud water (small droplets suspended in air) and rain water (larger droplets that fall). Depending on environmental conditions, the moist convection may organize itself on multiple length and time scales. Here we investigate the question, what is the minimal representation of water substance and dynamics that still reproduces the basic regimes of turbulent convective organization? The simplified models investigated here use a Boussinesq atmosphere with bulk cloud physics involving equations for water vapour and rain water only. As a first test of the minimal models, we investigate organization or lack thereof on relatively small length scales of approximately 100 km and time scales of a few days. It is demonstrated that the minimal models produce either unorganized ('scattered') or organized convection in appropriate environmental conditions, depending on the environmental wind shear. For the case of organized convection, the models qualitatively capture features of propagating squall lines that are observed in nature and in more comprehensive cloud resolving models, such as tilted rain water profiles, low-altitude cold pools and propagation speed corresponding to the maximum of the horizontally averaged, horizontal velocity.

AB - Simulations of precipitating convection would typically use a non-Boussinesq dynamical core such as the anelastic equations, and would incorporate water substance in all of its phases: vapour, liquid and ice. Furthermore, the liquid water phase would be separated into cloud water (small droplets suspended in air) and rain water (larger droplets that fall). Depending on environmental conditions, the moist convection may organize itself on multiple length and time scales. Here we investigate the question, what is the minimal representation of water substance and dynamics that still reproduces the basic regimes of turbulent convective organization? The simplified models investigated here use a Boussinesq atmosphere with bulk cloud physics involving equations for water vapour and rain water only. As a first test of the minimal models, we investigate organization or lack thereof on relatively small length scales of approximately 100 km and time scales of a few days. It is demonstrated that the minimal models produce either unorganized ('scattered') or organized convection in appropriate environmental conditions, depending on the environmental wind shear. For the case of organized convection, the models qualitatively capture features of propagating squall lines that are observed in nature and in more comprehensive cloud resolving models, such as tilted rain water profiles, low-altitude cold pools and propagation speed corresponding to the maximum of the horizontally averaged, horizontal velocity.

KW - geophysical and geological flows

KW - moist convection

KW - turbulent flows

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873396923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873396923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/jfm.2012.597

DO - 10.1017/jfm.2012.597

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873396923

VL - 717

SP - 576

EP - 611

JO - Journal of Fluid Mechanics

JF - Journal of Fluid Mechanics

SN - 0022-1120

ER -