Microjustice and macrojustice in the allocation of resources between experimental groups

John T. Jost, Assaad E. Azzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Allocations between experimental groups were hypothesized to be affected by (a) the type of resource being allocated and (b) whether allocations were for groups as whole units or for individuals within the groups. U.S. college students (N=19) were asked to allocate a property for individual use (money) and a property for social power (calculator time), between either two individuals or two groups. Respondents allocated more money than calculator time to members of a numerical majority group, but only when allocations were made between groups. This pattern of data reached statistical significance for members of the majority and control groups but not for members of the minority group. The evidence suggests that intergroup allocations reflect fairness norms (such as proportionality and equality between groups) as well as in-group favoritism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-365
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume136
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Resource Allocation
Minority Groups
Students
Control Groups
Surveys and Questionnaires
Power (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Microjustice and macrojustice in the allocation of resources between experimental groups. / Jost, John T.; Azzi, Assaad E.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 136, No. 3, 1996, p. 349-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dd22bba3a58145a09fadf075c2a54268,
title = "Microjustice and macrojustice in the allocation of resources between experimental groups",
abstract = "Allocations between experimental groups were hypothesized to be affected by (a) the type of resource being allocated and (b) whether allocations were for groups as whole units or for individuals within the groups. U.S. college students (N=19) were asked to allocate a property for individual use (money) and a property for social power (calculator time), between either two individuals or two groups. Respondents allocated more money than calculator time to members of a numerical majority group, but only when allocations were made between groups. This pattern of data reached statistical significance for members of the majority and control groups but not for members of the minority group. The evidence suggests that intergroup allocations reflect fairness norms (such as proportionality and equality between groups) as well as in-group favoritism.",
author = "Jost, {John T.} and Azzi, {Assaad E.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "349--365",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microjustice and macrojustice in the allocation of resources between experimental groups

AU - Jost, John T.

AU - Azzi, Assaad E.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Allocations between experimental groups were hypothesized to be affected by (a) the type of resource being allocated and (b) whether allocations were for groups as whole units or for individuals within the groups. U.S. college students (N=19) were asked to allocate a property for individual use (money) and a property for social power (calculator time), between either two individuals or two groups. Respondents allocated more money than calculator time to members of a numerical majority group, but only when allocations were made between groups. This pattern of data reached statistical significance for members of the majority and control groups but not for members of the minority group. The evidence suggests that intergroup allocations reflect fairness norms (such as proportionality and equality between groups) as well as in-group favoritism.

AB - Allocations between experimental groups were hypothesized to be affected by (a) the type of resource being allocated and (b) whether allocations were for groups as whole units or for individuals within the groups. U.S. college students (N=19) were asked to allocate a property for individual use (money) and a property for social power (calculator time), between either two individuals or two groups. Respondents allocated more money than calculator time to members of a numerical majority group, but only when allocations were made between groups. This pattern of data reached statistical significance for members of the majority and control groups but not for members of the minority group. The evidence suggests that intergroup allocations reflect fairness norms (such as proportionality and equality between groups) as well as in-group favoritism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344473732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21344473732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 349

EP - 365

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 3

ER -