Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of class i flowable resin composite restorations

C. S. Sampaio, K. J. Chiu, E. Farrokhmanesh, M. Janal, R. M. Puppin-Rontani, M. Giannini, E. A. Bonfante, Paulo Coelho, R. Hirata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present study aimed to characterize the pattern and volume of polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin composites, including one conventional, two bulk fill, and one self-adhesive Standardized class I preparations (2.5 mm depth × 4 mm length × 4 mm wide) were performed in 24 caries-free human third molars that were randomly divided in four groups, according to the resin composite and adhesive system used: group 1 = Permaflo + Peak Universal Bond (PP); group 2 = Filtek Bulk Fill + Scotchbond Universal (FS); group 3 = Surefil SDR + XP Bond (SX); and group 4 = Vertise flow self-adhering (VE) (n=6). Each tooth was scanned three times using a microcomputed tomography (μCT) apparatus. The first scan was done after the cavity preparation, the second after cavity filling with the flowable resin composite before curing, and the third after it was cured. The μCT images were imported into three-dimensional rendering software, and volumetric polymerization shrinkage percentage was calculated for each sample. Data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons. No significant difference was observed among PP, FS, and VE. SX bulk fill resin composite presented the lowest values of volumetric shrinkage. Shrinkage was mostly observed along the occlusal surface and part of the pulpal floor. In conclusion, polymerization shrinkage outcomes in a 2.5-mm deep class I cavity were material dependent, although most materials did not differ. The location of shrinkage was mainly at the occlusal surface.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E16-E23
JournalOperative Dentistry
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

X-Ray Microtomography
Polymerization
Composite Resins
Adhesives
Third Molar
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Software
flowable hybrid composite
Scotchbond
XP-Bond

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Sampaio, C. S., Chiu, K. J., Farrokhmanesh, E., Janal, M., Puppin-Rontani, R. M., Giannini, M., ... Hirata, R. (2017). Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of class i flowable resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry, 42(1), E16-E23. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-296-L

Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of class i flowable resin composite restorations. / Sampaio, C. S.; Chiu, K. J.; Farrokhmanesh, E.; Janal, M.; Puppin-Rontani, R. M.; Giannini, M.; Bonfante, E. A.; Coelho, Paulo; Hirata, R.

In: Operative Dentistry, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. E16-E23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sampaio, CS, Chiu, KJ, Farrokhmanesh, E, Janal, M, Puppin-Rontani, RM, Giannini, M, Bonfante, EA, Coelho, P & Hirata, R 2017, 'Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of class i flowable resin composite restorations', Operative Dentistry, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. E16-E23. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-296-L
Sampaio CS, Chiu KJ, Farrokhmanesh E, Janal M, Puppin-Rontani RM, Giannini M et al. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of class i flowable resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2017 Jan 1;42(1):E16-E23. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-296-L
Sampaio, C. S. ; Chiu, K. J. ; Farrokhmanesh, E. ; Janal, M. ; Puppin-Rontani, R. M. ; Giannini, M. ; Bonfante, E. A. ; Coelho, Paulo ; Hirata, R. / Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of class i flowable resin composite restorations. In: Operative Dentistry. 2017 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. E16-E23.
@article{1f6f58924c094d309d36caf1b4b09f18,
title = "Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of class i flowable resin composite restorations",
abstract = "The present study aimed to characterize the pattern and volume of polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin composites, including one conventional, two bulk fill, and one self-adhesive Standardized class I preparations (2.5 mm depth × 4 mm length × 4 mm wide) were performed in 24 caries-free human third molars that were randomly divided in four groups, according to the resin composite and adhesive system used: group 1 = Permaflo + Peak Universal Bond (PP); group 2 = Filtek Bulk Fill + Scotchbond Universal (FS); group 3 = Surefil SDR + XP Bond (SX); and group 4 = Vertise flow self-adhering (VE) (n=6). Each tooth was scanned three times using a microcomputed tomography (μCT) apparatus. The first scan was done after the cavity preparation, the second after cavity filling with the flowable resin composite before curing, and the third after it was cured. The μCT images were imported into three-dimensional rendering software, and volumetric polymerization shrinkage percentage was calculated for each sample. Data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons. No significant difference was observed among PP, FS, and VE. SX bulk fill resin composite presented the lowest values of volumetric shrinkage. Shrinkage was mostly observed along the occlusal surface and part of the pulpal floor. In conclusion, polymerization shrinkage outcomes in a 2.5-mm deep class I cavity were material dependent, although most materials did not differ. The location of shrinkage was mainly at the occlusal surface.",
author = "Sampaio, {C. S.} and Chiu, {K. J.} and E. Farrokhmanesh and M. Janal and Puppin-Rontani, {R. M.} and M. Giannini and Bonfante, {E. A.} and Paulo Coelho and R. Hirata",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2341/15-296-L",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "E16--E23",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of class i flowable resin composite restorations

AU - Sampaio, C. S.

AU - Chiu, K. J.

AU - Farrokhmanesh, E.

AU - Janal, M.

AU - Puppin-Rontani, R. M.

AU - Giannini, M.

AU - Bonfante, E. A.

AU - Coelho, Paulo

AU - Hirata, R.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The present study aimed to characterize the pattern and volume of polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin composites, including one conventional, two bulk fill, and one self-adhesive Standardized class I preparations (2.5 mm depth × 4 mm length × 4 mm wide) were performed in 24 caries-free human third molars that were randomly divided in four groups, according to the resin composite and adhesive system used: group 1 = Permaflo + Peak Universal Bond (PP); group 2 = Filtek Bulk Fill + Scotchbond Universal (FS); group 3 = Surefil SDR + XP Bond (SX); and group 4 = Vertise flow self-adhering (VE) (n=6). Each tooth was scanned three times using a microcomputed tomography (μCT) apparatus. The first scan was done after the cavity preparation, the second after cavity filling with the flowable resin composite before curing, and the third after it was cured. The μCT images were imported into three-dimensional rendering software, and volumetric polymerization shrinkage percentage was calculated for each sample. Data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons. No significant difference was observed among PP, FS, and VE. SX bulk fill resin composite presented the lowest values of volumetric shrinkage. Shrinkage was mostly observed along the occlusal surface and part of the pulpal floor. In conclusion, polymerization shrinkage outcomes in a 2.5-mm deep class I cavity were material dependent, although most materials did not differ. The location of shrinkage was mainly at the occlusal surface.

AB - The present study aimed to characterize the pattern and volume of polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin composites, including one conventional, two bulk fill, and one self-adhesive Standardized class I preparations (2.5 mm depth × 4 mm length × 4 mm wide) were performed in 24 caries-free human third molars that were randomly divided in four groups, according to the resin composite and adhesive system used: group 1 = Permaflo + Peak Universal Bond (PP); group 2 = Filtek Bulk Fill + Scotchbond Universal (FS); group 3 = Surefil SDR + XP Bond (SX); and group 4 = Vertise flow self-adhering (VE) (n=6). Each tooth was scanned three times using a microcomputed tomography (μCT) apparatus. The first scan was done after the cavity preparation, the second after cavity filling with the flowable resin composite before curing, and the third after it was cured. The μCT images were imported into three-dimensional rendering software, and volumetric polymerization shrinkage percentage was calculated for each sample. Data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons. No significant difference was observed among PP, FS, and VE. SX bulk fill resin composite presented the lowest values of volumetric shrinkage. Shrinkage was mostly observed along the occlusal surface and part of the pulpal floor. In conclusion, polymerization shrinkage outcomes in a 2.5-mm deep class I cavity were material dependent, although most materials did not differ. The location of shrinkage was mainly at the occlusal surface.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008392771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008392771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2341/15-296-L

DO - 10.2341/15-296-L

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - E16-E23

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 1

ER -