Methodological challenges in psychiatric treatment adherence research

Dawn I. Velligan, Martha Sajatovic, Marcia Valenstein, William T. Riley, Steven Safren, Roberto Lewis-Fernandez, Peter Weiden, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Julian Jamison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reflecting an increasing awareness of the importance of treatment adherence on outcomes in psychiatric populations, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) convened a panel of treatment adherence researchers on September 27-28, 2007 to discuss and articulate potential solutions for dealing with methodological adherence research challenges. Panel discussions and presentations were augmented with targeted review of the literature on specific topics, with a focus on adherence to medication treatments in adults with serious mental illness. The group discussed three primary methodological areas: participants, measures, and interventions. When selecting patients for adherence-enhancing interventions (AEIs), a three-tier model was proposed that draws from the universal (targeting all patients receiving medication treatment for a specific condition, regardless of current adherence), selective (targeting patients at risk for nonadherence), and indicated (targeting patients who are currently nonadherent) prevention model and emphasizes careful patient characterization in relevant domains and appropriate matching of interventions to the selected population. Proposals were also made to reduce problematic selection biases in patient recruitment and retention. The panel addressed the pros and cons of various methods that can be used to measure adherence, and concluded that it is appropriate to use multiple measures whenever possible. Finally, the panel identified a broad range of intervention approaches, and conditions under which these interventions are likely to be most effective at reducing barriers to adherence and reinforcing adherence behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-91
Number of pages18
JournalClinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Research
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Medication Adherence
Selection Bias
Therapeutics
Patient Compliance
Patient Selection
Population
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Compliance
  • Research methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Velligan, D. I., Sajatovic, M., Valenstein, M., Riley, W. T., Safren, S., Lewis-Fernandez, R., ... Jamison, J. (2010). Methodological challenges in psychiatric treatment adherence research. Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses, 4(1), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.4.1.6

Methodological challenges in psychiatric treatment adherence research. / Velligan, Dawn I.; Sajatovic, Martha; Valenstein, Marcia; Riley, William T.; Safren, Steven; Lewis-Fernandez, Roberto; Weiden, Peter; Ogedegbe, Gbenga; Jamison, Julian.

In: Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses, Vol. 4, No. 1, 04.2010, p. 74-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Velligan, DI, Sajatovic, M, Valenstein, M, Riley, WT, Safren, S, Lewis-Fernandez, R, Weiden, P, Ogedegbe, G & Jamison, J 2010, 'Methodological challenges in psychiatric treatment adherence research', Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 74-91. https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.4.1.6
Velligan DI, Sajatovic M, Valenstein M, Riley WT, Safren S, Lewis-Fernandez R et al. Methodological challenges in psychiatric treatment adherence research. Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses. 2010 Apr;4(1):74-91. https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.4.1.6
Velligan, Dawn I. ; Sajatovic, Martha ; Valenstein, Marcia ; Riley, William T. ; Safren, Steven ; Lewis-Fernandez, Roberto ; Weiden, Peter ; Ogedegbe, Gbenga ; Jamison, Julian. / Methodological challenges in psychiatric treatment adherence research. In: Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses. 2010 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 74-91.
@article{aed7004981be4f6eb217d18a167b179f,
title = "Methodological challenges in psychiatric treatment adherence research",
abstract = "Reflecting an increasing awareness of the importance of treatment adherence on outcomes in psychiatric populations, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) convened a panel of treatment adherence researchers on September 27-28, 2007 to discuss and articulate potential solutions for dealing with methodological adherence research challenges. Panel discussions and presentations were augmented with targeted review of the literature on specific topics, with a focus on adherence to medication treatments in adults with serious mental illness. The group discussed three primary methodological areas: participants, measures, and interventions. When selecting patients for adherence-enhancing interventions (AEIs), a three-tier model was proposed that draws from the universal (targeting all patients receiving medication treatment for a specific condition, regardless of current adherence), selective (targeting patients at risk for nonadherence), and indicated (targeting patients who are currently nonadherent) prevention model and emphasizes careful patient characterization in relevant domains and appropriate matching of interventions to the selected population. Proposals were also made to reduce problematic selection biases in patient recruitment and retention. The panel addressed the pros and cons of various methods that can be used to measure adherence, and concluded that it is appropriate to use multiple measures whenever possible. Finally, the panel identified a broad range of intervention approaches, and conditions under which these interventions are likely to be most effective at reducing barriers to adherence and reinforcing adherence behavior.",
keywords = "Adherence, Compliance, Research methods",
author = "Velligan, {Dawn I.} and Martha Sajatovic and Marcia Valenstein and Riley, {William T.} and Steven Safren and Roberto Lewis-Fernandez and Peter Weiden and Gbenga Ogedegbe and Julian Jamison",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.3371/CSRP.4.1.6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "74--91",
journal = "Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses",
issn = "1935-1232",
publisher = "Walsh Medical Media, LLC",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological challenges in psychiatric treatment adherence research

AU - Velligan, Dawn I.

AU - Sajatovic, Martha

AU - Valenstein, Marcia

AU - Riley, William T.

AU - Safren, Steven

AU - Lewis-Fernandez, Roberto

AU - Weiden, Peter

AU - Ogedegbe, Gbenga

AU - Jamison, Julian

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Reflecting an increasing awareness of the importance of treatment adherence on outcomes in psychiatric populations, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) convened a panel of treatment adherence researchers on September 27-28, 2007 to discuss and articulate potential solutions for dealing with methodological adherence research challenges. Panel discussions and presentations were augmented with targeted review of the literature on specific topics, with a focus on adherence to medication treatments in adults with serious mental illness. The group discussed three primary methodological areas: participants, measures, and interventions. When selecting patients for adherence-enhancing interventions (AEIs), a three-tier model was proposed that draws from the universal (targeting all patients receiving medication treatment for a specific condition, regardless of current adherence), selective (targeting patients at risk for nonadherence), and indicated (targeting patients who are currently nonadherent) prevention model and emphasizes careful patient characterization in relevant domains and appropriate matching of interventions to the selected population. Proposals were also made to reduce problematic selection biases in patient recruitment and retention. The panel addressed the pros and cons of various methods that can be used to measure adherence, and concluded that it is appropriate to use multiple measures whenever possible. Finally, the panel identified a broad range of intervention approaches, and conditions under which these interventions are likely to be most effective at reducing barriers to adherence and reinforcing adherence behavior.

AB - Reflecting an increasing awareness of the importance of treatment adherence on outcomes in psychiatric populations, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) convened a panel of treatment adherence researchers on September 27-28, 2007 to discuss and articulate potential solutions for dealing with methodological adherence research challenges. Panel discussions and presentations were augmented with targeted review of the literature on specific topics, with a focus on adherence to medication treatments in adults with serious mental illness. The group discussed three primary methodological areas: participants, measures, and interventions. When selecting patients for adherence-enhancing interventions (AEIs), a three-tier model was proposed that draws from the universal (targeting all patients receiving medication treatment for a specific condition, regardless of current adherence), selective (targeting patients at risk for nonadherence), and indicated (targeting patients who are currently nonadherent) prevention model and emphasizes careful patient characterization in relevant domains and appropriate matching of interventions to the selected population. Proposals were also made to reduce problematic selection biases in patient recruitment and retention. The panel addressed the pros and cons of various methods that can be used to measure adherence, and concluded that it is appropriate to use multiple measures whenever possible. Finally, the panel identified a broad range of intervention approaches, and conditions under which these interventions are likely to be most effective at reducing barriers to adherence and reinforcing adherence behavior.

KW - Adherence

KW - Compliance

KW - Research methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950585861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950585861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3371/CSRP.4.1.6

DO - 10.3371/CSRP.4.1.6

M3 - Article

C2 - 20643631

AN - SCOPUS:77950585861

VL - 4

SP - 74

EP - 91

JO - Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses

JF - Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses

SN - 1935-1232

IS - 1

ER -