Memory for forms

Common memory formats for verbal and visual stimulus presentations

Gregory L. Murphy, J. Wesley Hutchinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Numerous experiments have attempted to show that people use a visuospatial representation to remember pictures and objects by demonstrating that perceptual variables affect memory perlormance. One problem with such experiments is that perceptual differences in the stimuli could cause differences in a verbal representation as well (i.e., could lead to different descriptions). The three experiments reported here use as stimuli a set of geometric forms designed to have identical verbal descriptions, yet to differ in visual complexity. Results showed that recall differences could be predicted on the basis of visual complexity whether' the stimuli were described or presented visually. Furthermore, this result cannot be attributed to a response bias in reproducing the stimuli. Various models of memory for forms are considered in the light of these results, as well as the "tacit knowledge" explanation for mental imagery phenomena.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)54-61
Number of pages8
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1982

Fingerprint

Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Stimulus
Visual Stimuli
Experiment
Tacit Knowledge
Mental Imagery
Causes
Response Bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Memory for forms : Common memory formats for verbal and visual stimulus presentations. / Murphy, Gregory L.; Hutchinson, J. Wesley.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.1982, p. 54-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murphy, Gregory L. ; Hutchinson, J. Wesley. / Memory for forms : Common memory formats for verbal and visual stimulus presentations. In: Memory & Cognition. 1982 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 54-61.
@article{f42e5848d86b4dd8b60d73ad1aa9e117,
title = "Memory for forms: Common memory formats for verbal and visual stimulus presentations",
abstract = "Numerous experiments have attempted to show that people use a visuospatial representation to remember pictures and objects by demonstrating that perceptual variables affect memory perlormance. One problem with such experiments is that perceptual differences in the stimuli could cause differences in a verbal representation as well (i.e., could lead to different descriptions). The three experiments reported here use as stimuli a set of geometric forms designed to have identical verbal descriptions, yet to differ in visual complexity. Results showed that recall differences could be predicted on the basis of visual complexity whether' the stimuli were described or presented visually. Furthermore, this result cannot be attributed to a response bias in reproducing the stimuli. Various models of memory for forms are considered in the light of these results, as well as the {"}tacit knowledge{"} explanation for mental imagery phenomena.",
author = "Murphy, {Gregory L.} and Hutchinson, {J. Wesley}",
year = "1982",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03197625",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "54--61",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory for forms

T2 - Common memory formats for verbal and visual stimulus presentations

AU - Murphy, Gregory L.

AU - Hutchinson, J. Wesley

PY - 1982/1

Y1 - 1982/1

N2 - Numerous experiments have attempted to show that people use a visuospatial representation to remember pictures and objects by demonstrating that perceptual variables affect memory perlormance. One problem with such experiments is that perceptual differences in the stimuli could cause differences in a verbal representation as well (i.e., could lead to different descriptions). The three experiments reported here use as stimuli a set of geometric forms designed to have identical verbal descriptions, yet to differ in visual complexity. Results showed that recall differences could be predicted on the basis of visual complexity whether' the stimuli were described or presented visually. Furthermore, this result cannot be attributed to a response bias in reproducing the stimuli. Various models of memory for forms are considered in the light of these results, as well as the "tacit knowledge" explanation for mental imagery phenomena.

AB - Numerous experiments have attempted to show that people use a visuospatial representation to remember pictures and objects by demonstrating that perceptual variables affect memory perlormance. One problem with such experiments is that perceptual differences in the stimuli could cause differences in a verbal representation as well (i.e., could lead to different descriptions). The three experiments reported here use as stimuli a set of geometric forms designed to have identical verbal descriptions, yet to differ in visual complexity. Results showed that recall differences could be predicted on the basis of visual complexity whether' the stimuli were described or presented visually. Furthermore, this result cannot be attributed to a response bias in reproducing the stimuli. Various models of memory for forms are considered in the light of these results, as well as the "tacit knowledge" explanation for mental imagery phenomena.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020069703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020069703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03197625

DO - 10.3758/BF03197625

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 54

EP - 61

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 1

ER -