MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference

Kimberly Leiken, Liina Pylkkänen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This study addresses a much-debated effect on a much-debated region: the increase of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) activation associated with object-extracted relative clauses. This haemodynamic result is one of the most central and most cited findings in the cognitive neuroscience of syntax and it has robustly contributed to the popular association of Broca’s region with syntax. Our study had two goals: (1) to characterise the timing of this classic effect with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and (2) to connect it to psycholinguistic research on the effects of similarity-based interference during sentence processing. Specifically, behavioural studies have shown that object relatives are primarily only costly when the two preverbal noun phrases are parallel in their surface syntax, for example, both consisting of a definite determiner and a noun (e.g. the reporter who the senator attacked), as opposed to employing, for example, a definite noun phrase and a proper name (the reporter who Bill attacked). This finding suggests that the difficulty of object extraction lies not within its syntax but rather in similarity-based interference affecting working memory processes. Although working memory is a prominent hypothesis for the LIFG engagement in object extraction, the haemodynamic literature has routinely employed stimuli involving parallel as opposed to non-parallel syntax. Using written sentences presented word-by-word, we tested whether an LIFG effect of object extraction is obtained with MEG, allowing us to characterise its timing, and whether it reduces or disappears if the two preverbal noun phrases are non-parallel in their surface syntax. Our results show an LIFG increase for object relatives at around 600 ms after verb onset, but only when the preverbal arguments are parallel. These findings are consistent with memory and competition-based explanations of the LIFG effect of object extraction and challenge accounts attributing it to displacement.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)381-389
    Number of pages9
    JournalLanguage, Cognition and Neuroscience
    Volume29
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Magnetoencephalography
    Prefrontal Cortex
    syntax
    interference
    evidence
    Short-Term Memory
    reporter
    Hemodynamics
    Psycholinguistics
    psycholinguistics
    Names
    neurosciences
    activation
    Interference
    Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus
    stimulus
    Syntax
    Research

    Keywords

    • Dependency formation
    • LIFG
    • MEG
    • Similarity-based interference

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Linguistics and Language
    • Cognitive Neuroscience

    Cite this

    MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference. / Leiken, Kimberly; Pylkkänen, Liina.

    In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2014, p. 381-389.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{60c853a08bfe4f6195b4e285dcd9a349,
    title = "MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference",
    abstract = "This study addresses a much-debated effect on a much-debated region: the increase of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) activation associated with object-extracted relative clauses. This haemodynamic result is one of the most central and most cited findings in the cognitive neuroscience of syntax and it has robustly contributed to the popular association of Broca’s region with syntax. Our study had two goals: (1) to characterise the timing of this classic effect with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and (2) to connect it to psycholinguistic research on the effects of similarity-based interference during sentence processing. Specifically, behavioural studies have shown that object relatives are primarily only costly when the two preverbal noun phrases are parallel in their surface syntax, for example, both consisting of a definite determiner and a noun (e.g. the reporter who the senator attacked), as opposed to employing, for example, a definite noun phrase and a proper name (the reporter who Bill attacked). This finding suggests that the difficulty of object extraction lies not within its syntax but rather in similarity-based interference affecting working memory processes. Although working memory is a prominent hypothesis for the LIFG engagement in object extraction, the haemodynamic literature has routinely employed stimuli involving parallel as opposed to non-parallel syntax. Using written sentences presented word-by-word, we tested whether an LIFG effect of object extraction is obtained with MEG, allowing us to characterise its timing, and whether it reduces or disappears if the two preverbal noun phrases are non-parallel in their surface syntax. Our results show an LIFG increase for object relatives at around 600 ms after verb onset, but only when the preverbal arguments are parallel. These findings are consistent with memory and competition-based explanations of the LIFG effect of object extraction and challenge accounts attributing it to displacement.",
    keywords = "Dependency formation, LIFG, MEG, Similarity-based interference",
    author = "Kimberly Leiken and Liina Pylkk{\"a}nen",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1080/01690965.2013.863369",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "29",
    pages = "381--389",
    journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
    issn = "2327-3798",
    publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference

    AU - Leiken, Kimberly

    AU - Pylkkänen, Liina

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - This study addresses a much-debated effect on a much-debated region: the increase of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) activation associated with object-extracted relative clauses. This haemodynamic result is one of the most central and most cited findings in the cognitive neuroscience of syntax and it has robustly contributed to the popular association of Broca’s region with syntax. Our study had two goals: (1) to characterise the timing of this classic effect with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and (2) to connect it to psycholinguistic research on the effects of similarity-based interference during sentence processing. Specifically, behavioural studies have shown that object relatives are primarily only costly when the two preverbal noun phrases are parallel in their surface syntax, for example, both consisting of a definite determiner and a noun (e.g. the reporter who the senator attacked), as opposed to employing, for example, a definite noun phrase and a proper name (the reporter who Bill attacked). This finding suggests that the difficulty of object extraction lies not within its syntax but rather in similarity-based interference affecting working memory processes. Although working memory is a prominent hypothesis for the LIFG engagement in object extraction, the haemodynamic literature has routinely employed stimuli involving parallel as opposed to non-parallel syntax. Using written sentences presented word-by-word, we tested whether an LIFG effect of object extraction is obtained with MEG, allowing us to characterise its timing, and whether it reduces or disappears if the two preverbal noun phrases are non-parallel in their surface syntax. Our results show an LIFG increase for object relatives at around 600 ms after verb onset, but only when the preverbal arguments are parallel. These findings are consistent with memory and competition-based explanations of the LIFG effect of object extraction and challenge accounts attributing it to displacement.

    AB - This study addresses a much-debated effect on a much-debated region: the increase of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) activation associated with object-extracted relative clauses. This haemodynamic result is one of the most central and most cited findings in the cognitive neuroscience of syntax and it has robustly contributed to the popular association of Broca’s region with syntax. Our study had two goals: (1) to characterise the timing of this classic effect with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and (2) to connect it to psycholinguistic research on the effects of similarity-based interference during sentence processing. Specifically, behavioural studies have shown that object relatives are primarily only costly when the two preverbal noun phrases are parallel in their surface syntax, for example, both consisting of a definite determiner and a noun (e.g. the reporter who the senator attacked), as opposed to employing, for example, a definite noun phrase and a proper name (the reporter who Bill attacked). This finding suggests that the difficulty of object extraction lies not within its syntax but rather in similarity-based interference affecting working memory processes. Although working memory is a prominent hypothesis for the LIFG engagement in object extraction, the haemodynamic literature has routinely employed stimuli involving parallel as opposed to non-parallel syntax. Using written sentences presented word-by-word, we tested whether an LIFG effect of object extraction is obtained with MEG, allowing us to characterise its timing, and whether it reduces or disappears if the two preverbal noun phrases are non-parallel in their surface syntax. Our results show an LIFG increase for object relatives at around 600 ms after verb onset, but only when the preverbal arguments are parallel. These findings are consistent with memory and competition-based explanations of the LIFG effect of object extraction and challenge accounts attributing it to displacement.

    KW - Dependency formation

    KW - LIFG

    KW - MEG

    KW - Similarity-based interference

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923221995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923221995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/01690965.2013.863369

    DO - 10.1080/01690965.2013.863369

    M3 - Article

    VL - 29

    SP - 381

    EP - 389

    JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

    JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

    SN - 2327-3798

    IS - 3

    ER -