Medicare payments, healthcare service use, and telemedicine implementation costs in a randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in medically underserved participants with diabetes mellitus (IDEATel)

Walter Palmas, Steven Shea, Justin Starren, Jeanne A. Teresi, Michael L. Ganz, Tanya M. Burton, Chris L. Pashos, Jan Blustein, Lesley Field, Philip C. Morin, Roberto E. Izquierdo, Stephanie Silver, Joseph P. Eimicke, Rafael A. Lantigua, Ruth S. Weinstock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective To determine whether a diabetes case management telemedicine intervention reduced healthcare expenditures, as measured by Medicare claims, and to assess the costs of developing and implementing the telemedicine intervention. Design We studied 1665 participants in the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel), a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedicine case management of diabetes to usual care. Participants were aged 55 years or older, and resided in federally designated medically underserved areas of New York State. Measurements We analyzed Medicare claims payments for each participant for up to 60 study months from date of randomization, until their death, or until December 31, 2006 (whichever happened first). We also analyzed study expenditures for the telemedicine intervention over six budget years (February 28, 2000e February 27, 2006). Results Mean annual Medicare payments (SE) were similar in the usual care and telemedicine groups, $9040 ($386) and $9669 ($443) per participant, respectively (p>0.05). Sensitivity analyses, including stratification by censored status, adjustment by enrollment site, and semi-parametric weighting by probability of dropping-out, rendered similar results. Over six budget years 28 821 participant/months of telemedicine intervention were delivered, at an estimated cost of $622 per participant/ month. Conclusion Telemedicine case management was not associated with a reduction in Medicare claims in this medically underserved population. The cost of implementing the telemedicine intervention was high, largely representing special purpose hardware and software costs required at the time. Lower implementation costs will need to be achieved using lower cost technology in order for telemedicine case management to be more widely used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-202
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Informatics
Telemedicine
Case Management
Medicare
Diabetes Mellitus
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Budgets
Health Expenditures
Medically Underserved Area
Vulnerable Populations
Random Allocation
Software
Randomized Controlled Trials
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Medicare payments, healthcare service use, and telemedicine implementation costs in a randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in medically underserved participants with diabetes mellitus (IDEATel). / Palmas, Walter; Shea, Steven; Starren, Justin; Teresi, Jeanne A.; Ganz, Michael L.; Burton, Tanya M.; Pashos, Chris L.; Blustein, Jan; Field, Lesley; Morin, Philip C.; Izquierdo, Roberto E.; Silver, Stephanie; Eimicke, Joseph P.; Lantigua, Rafael A.; Weinstock, Ruth S.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 17, No. 2, 03.2010, p. 196-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Palmas, Walter ; Shea, Steven ; Starren, Justin ; Teresi, Jeanne A. ; Ganz, Michael L. ; Burton, Tanya M. ; Pashos, Chris L. ; Blustein, Jan ; Field, Lesley ; Morin, Philip C. ; Izquierdo, Roberto E. ; Silver, Stephanie ; Eimicke, Joseph P. ; Lantigua, Rafael A. ; Weinstock, Ruth S. / Medicare payments, healthcare service use, and telemedicine implementation costs in a randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in medically underserved participants with diabetes mellitus (IDEATel). In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 196-202.
@article{66978a5cdbf44fb48578639c1679a757,
title = "Medicare payments, healthcare service use, and telemedicine implementation costs in a randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in medically underserved participants with diabetes mellitus (IDEATel)",
abstract = "Objective To determine whether a diabetes case management telemedicine intervention reduced healthcare expenditures, as measured by Medicare claims, and to assess the costs of developing and implementing the telemedicine intervention. Design We studied 1665 participants in the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel), a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedicine case management of diabetes to usual care. Participants were aged 55 years or older, and resided in federally designated medically underserved areas of New York State. Measurements We analyzed Medicare claims payments for each participant for up to 60 study months from date of randomization, until their death, or until December 31, 2006 (whichever happened first). We also analyzed study expenditures for the telemedicine intervention over six budget years (February 28, 2000e February 27, 2006). Results Mean annual Medicare payments (SE) were similar in the usual care and telemedicine groups, $9040 ($386) and $9669 ($443) per participant, respectively (p>0.05). Sensitivity analyses, including stratification by censored status, adjustment by enrollment site, and semi-parametric weighting by probability of dropping-out, rendered similar results. Over six budget years 28 821 participant/months of telemedicine intervention were delivered, at an estimated cost of $622 per participant/ month. Conclusion Telemedicine case management was not associated with a reduction in Medicare claims in this medically underserved population. The cost of implementing the telemedicine intervention was high, largely representing special purpose hardware and software costs required at the time. Lower implementation costs will need to be achieved using lower cost technology in order for telemedicine case management to be more widely used.",
author = "Walter Palmas and Steven Shea and Justin Starren and Teresi, {Jeanne A.} and Ganz, {Michael L.} and Burton, {Tanya M.} and Pashos, {Chris L.} and Jan Blustein and Lesley Field and Morin, {Philip C.} and Izquierdo, {Roberto E.} and Stephanie Silver and Eimicke, {Joseph P.} and Lantigua, {Rafael A.} and Weinstock, {Ruth S.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1136/jamia.2009.002592",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "196--202",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medicare payments, healthcare service use, and telemedicine implementation costs in a randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in medically underserved participants with diabetes mellitus (IDEATel)

AU - Palmas, Walter

AU - Shea, Steven

AU - Starren, Justin

AU - Teresi, Jeanne A.

AU - Ganz, Michael L.

AU - Burton, Tanya M.

AU - Pashos, Chris L.

AU - Blustein, Jan

AU - Field, Lesley

AU - Morin, Philip C.

AU - Izquierdo, Roberto E.

AU - Silver, Stephanie

AU - Eimicke, Joseph P.

AU - Lantigua, Rafael A.

AU - Weinstock, Ruth S.

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Objective To determine whether a diabetes case management telemedicine intervention reduced healthcare expenditures, as measured by Medicare claims, and to assess the costs of developing and implementing the telemedicine intervention. Design We studied 1665 participants in the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel), a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedicine case management of diabetes to usual care. Participants were aged 55 years or older, and resided in federally designated medically underserved areas of New York State. Measurements We analyzed Medicare claims payments for each participant for up to 60 study months from date of randomization, until their death, or until December 31, 2006 (whichever happened first). We also analyzed study expenditures for the telemedicine intervention over six budget years (February 28, 2000e February 27, 2006). Results Mean annual Medicare payments (SE) were similar in the usual care and telemedicine groups, $9040 ($386) and $9669 ($443) per participant, respectively (p>0.05). Sensitivity analyses, including stratification by censored status, adjustment by enrollment site, and semi-parametric weighting by probability of dropping-out, rendered similar results. Over six budget years 28 821 participant/months of telemedicine intervention were delivered, at an estimated cost of $622 per participant/ month. Conclusion Telemedicine case management was not associated with a reduction in Medicare claims in this medically underserved population. The cost of implementing the telemedicine intervention was high, largely representing special purpose hardware and software costs required at the time. Lower implementation costs will need to be achieved using lower cost technology in order for telemedicine case management to be more widely used.

AB - Objective To determine whether a diabetes case management telemedicine intervention reduced healthcare expenditures, as measured by Medicare claims, and to assess the costs of developing and implementing the telemedicine intervention. Design We studied 1665 participants in the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel), a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedicine case management of diabetes to usual care. Participants were aged 55 years or older, and resided in federally designated medically underserved areas of New York State. Measurements We analyzed Medicare claims payments for each participant for up to 60 study months from date of randomization, until their death, or until December 31, 2006 (whichever happened first). We also analyzed study expenditures for the telemedicine intervention over six budget years (February 28, 2000e February 27, 2006). Results Mean annual Medicare payments (SE) were similar in the usual care and telemedicine groups, $9040 ($386) and $9669 ($443) per participant, respectively (p>0.05). Sensitivity analyses, including stratification by censored status, adjustment by enrollment site, and semi-parametric weighting by probability of dropping-out, rendered similar results. Over six budget years 28 821 participant/months of telemedicine intervention were delivered, at an estimated cost of $622 per participant/ month. Conclusion Telemedicine case management was not associated with a reduction in Medicare claims in this medically underserved population. The cost of implementing the telemedicine intervention was high, largely representing special purpose hardware and software costs required at the time. Lower implementation costs will need to be achieved using lower cost technology in order for telemedicine case management to be more widely used.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953164716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953164716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jamia.2009.002592

DO - 10.1136/jamia.2009.002592

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 196

EP - 202

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 2

ER -