Medical students as human subjects in educational research

Umut Sarpel, Mary Ann Hopkins, Frederick More, Steven Yavner, Martin Pusic, Michael W. Nick, Hyuksoon Song, Rachel Ellaway, Adina L. Kalet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Special concerns often arise when medical students are themselves the subjects of education research. A recently completed large, multi-center randomized controlled trial of computer-assisted learning modules for surgical clerks provided the opportunity to explore the perceived level of risk of studies where medical students serve as human subjects by reporting on: 1) the response of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at seven institutions to the same study protocol; and 2) the thoughts and feelings of students across study sites about being research subjects.

METHODS: From July 2009 to August 2010, all third-year medical students at seven collaborating institutions were eligible to participate. Patterns of IRB review of the same protocol were compared. Participation burden was calculated in terms of the time spent interacting with the modules. Focus groups were conducted with medical students at each site. Transcripts were coded by three independent reviewers and analyzed using Atlas.ti.

RESULTS: The IRBs at the seven participating institutions granted full (n=1), expedited (n=4), or exempt (n=2) review of the WISE Trial protocol. 995 (73% of those eligible) consented to participate, and 207 (20%) of these students completed all outcome measures. The average time to complete the computer modules and associated measures was 175 min. Common themes in focus groups with participant students included the desire to contribute to medical education research, the absence of coercion to consent, and the low-risk nature of the research.

DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate that risk assessment and the extent of review utilized for medical education research vary among IRBs. Despite variability in the perception of risk implied by differing IRB requirements, students themselves felt education research was low risk and did not consider themselves to be vulnerable. The vast majority of eligible medical students were willing to participate as research subjects. Participants acknowledged the time demands of their participation and were readily able to withdraw when those burdens became unsustainable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19524
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Education Online
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Research Ethics Committees
educational research
Medical Students
medical student
Students
Research Subjects
Research
Medical Education
Focus Groups
Biomedical Research
Coercion
Education
education
Atlases
student
Clinical Protocols
participation
Emotions
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • computer-assisted instruction
  • educational research
  • institutional review board
  • learning
  • medical students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Sarpel, U., Hopkins, M. A., More, F., Yavner, S., Pusic, M., Nick, M. W., ... Kalet, A. L. (2013). Medical students as human subjects in educational research. Medical Education Online, 18(1), 19524. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.19524

Medical students as human subjects in educational research. / Sarpel, Umut; Hopkins, Mary Ann; More, Frederick; Yavner, Steven; Pusic, Martin; Nick, Michael W.; Song, Hyuksoon; Ellaway, Rachel; Kalet, Adina L.

In: Medical Education Online, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 19524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sarpel, U, Hopkins, MA, More, F, Yavner, S, Pusic, M, Nick, MW, Song, H, Ellaway, R & Kalet, AL 2013, 'Medical students as human subjects in educational research', Medical Education Online, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 19524. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.19524
Sarpel, Umut ; Hopkins, Mary Ann ; More, Frederick ; Yavner, Steven ; Pusic, Martin ; Nick, Michael W. ; Song, Hyuksoon ; Ellaway, Rachel ; Kalet, Adina L. / Medical students as human subjects in educational research. In: Medical Education Online. 2013 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 19524.
@article{3a10772078364d0c8497bc5ddfc45d7c,
title = "Medical students as human subjects in educational research",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Special concerns often arise when medical students are themselves the subjects of education research. A recently completed large, multi-center randomized controlled trial of computer-assisted learning modules for surgical clerks provided the opportunity to explore the perceived level of risk of studies where medical students serve as human subjects by reporting on: 1) the response of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at seven institutions to the same study protocol; and 2) the thoughts and feelings of students across study sites about being research subjects.METHODS: From July 2009 to August 2010, all third-year medical students at seven collaborating institutions were eligible to participate. Patterns of IRB review of the same protocol were compared. Participation burden was calculated in terms of the time spent interacting with the modules. Focus groups were conducted with medical students at each site. Transcripts were coded by three independent reviewers and analyzed using Atlas.ti.RESULTS: The IRBs at the seven participating institutions granted full (n=1), expedited (n=4), or exempt (n=2) review of the WISE Trial protocol. 995 (73{\%} of those eligible) consented to participate, and 207 (20{\%}) of these students completed all outcome measures. The average time to complete the computer modules and associated measures was 175 min. Common themes in focus groups with participant students included the desire to contribute to medical education research, the absence of coercion to consent, and the low-risk nature of the research.DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate that risk assessment and the extent of review utilized for medical education research vary among IRBs. Despite variability in the perception of risk implied by differing IRB requirements, students themselves felt education research was low risk and did not consider themselves to be vulnerable. The vast majority of eligible medical students were willing to participate as research subjects. Participants acknowledged the time demands of their participation and were readily able to withdraw when those burdens became unsustainable.",
keywords = "computer-assisted instruction, educational research, institutional review board, learning, medical students",
author = "Umut Sarpel and Hopkins, {Mary Ann} and Frederick More and Steven Yavner and Martin Pusic and Nick, {Michael W.} and Hyuksoon Song and Rachel Ellaway and Kalet, {Adina L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3402/meo.v18i0.19524",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "19524",
journal = "Medical Education Online",
issn = "1087-2981",
publisher = "Co-Action Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical students as human subjects in educational research

AU - Sarpel, Umut

AU - Hopkins, Mary Ann

AU - More, Frederick

AU - Yavner, Steven

AU - Pusic, Martin

AU - Nick, Michael W.

AU - Song, Hyuksoon

AU - Ellaway, Rachel

AU - Kalet, Adina L.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Special concerns often arise when medical students are themselves the subjects of education research. A recently completed large, multi-center randomized controlled trial of computer-assisted learning modules for surgical clerks provided the opportunity to explore the perceived level of risk of studies where medical students serve as human subjects by reporting on: 1) the response of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at seven institutions to the same study protocol; and 2) the thoughts and feelings of students across study sites about being research subjects.METHODS: From July 2009 to August 2010, all third-year medical students at seven collaborating institutions were eligible to participate. Patterns of IRB review of the same protocol were compared. Participation burden was calculated in terms of the time spent interacting with the modules. Focus groups were conducted with medical students at each site. Transcripts were coded by three independent reviewers and analyzed using Atlas.ti.RESULTS: The IRBs at the seven participating institutions granted full (n=1), expedited (n=4), or exempt (n=2) review of the WISE Trial protocol. 995 (73% of those eligible) consented to participate, and 207 (20%) of these students completed all outcome measures. The average time to complete the computer modules and associated measures was 175 min. Common themes in focus groups with participant students included the desire to contribute to medical education research, the absence of coercion to consent, and the low-risk nature of the research.DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate that risk assessment and the extent of review utilized for medical education research vary among IRBs. Despite variability in the perception of risk implied by differing IRB requirements, students themselves felt education research was low risk and did not consider themselves to be vulnerable. The vast majority of eligible medical students were willing to participate as research subjects. Participants acknowledged the time demands of their participation and were readily able to withdraw when those burdens became unsustainable.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Special concerns often arise when medical students are themselves the subjects of education research. A recently completed large, multi-center randomized controlled trial of computer-assisted learning modules for surgical clerks provided the opportunity to explore the perceived level of risk of studies where medical students serve as human subjects by reporting on: 1) the response of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at seven institutions to the same study protocol; and 2) the thoughts and feelings of students across study sites about being research subjects.METHODS: From July 2009 to August 2010, all third-year medical students at seven collaborating institutions were eligible to participate. Patterns of IRB review of the same protocol were compared. Participation burden was calculated in terms of the time spent interacting with the modules. Focus groups were conducted with medical students at each site. Transcripts were coded by three independent reviewers and analyzed using Atlas.ti.RESULTS: The IRBs at the seven participating institutions granted full (n=1), expedited (n=4), or exempt (n=2) review of the WISE Trial protocol. 995 (73% of those eligible) consented to participate, and 207 (20%) of these students completed all outcome measures. The average time to complete the computer modules and associated measures was 175 min. Common themes in focus groups with participant students included the desire to contribute to medical education research, the absence of coercion to consent, and the low-risk nature of the research.DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate that risk assessment and the extent of review utilized for medical education research vary among IRBs. Despite variability in the perception of risk implied by differing IRB requirements, students themselves felt education research was low risk and did not consider themselves to be vulnerable. The vast majority of eligible medical students were willing to participate as research subjects. Participants acknowledged the time demands of their participation and were readily able to withdraw when those burdens became unsustainable.

KW - computer-assisted instruction

KW - educational research

KW - institutional review board

KW - learning

KW - medical students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015001161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015001161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3402/meo.v18i0.19524

DO - 10.3402/meo.v18i0.19524

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 19524

JO - Medical Education Online

JF - Medical Education Online

SN - 1087-2981

IS - 1

ER -