Medical emergency team calls in the radiology department

Patient characteristics and outcomes

Lora K. Ott, Michael R. Pinsky, Leslie A. Hoffman, Sean Clarke, Sunday Clark, Dianxu Ren, Marilyn Hravnak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: We sought to identify the characteristics of patients who experience medical emergency team calls in the radiology department (MET-RD) and the relationship between these characteristics and patient outcomes. Design/participants: Retrospective review of 111 inpatient MET-RD calls (May 2008eApril 2010). Setting: Academic medical centre with a well established MET system. Measurements: The characteristics of patients before, during and after transport to radiology were extracted from medical records and administrative databases. These characteristics were compared between patients with good and poor outcomes. Main results: The majority of patients who experience MET-RD calls had a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4 and were from non-intensive care units (60%). Almost half (43%) of MET-RD calls occurred during patients'first day in hospital. Patients commonly arrived with nasal cannula oxygen (38%), recent tachypnoea (28%) and tachycardia (34%). A minority (16%) fulfilled MET call criteria in the 12 h before the MET-RD. MET-RD etiologies were cardiac (41%), respiratory (29%) or neurological (25%), and occurred most frequently during CT (44%) and MRI (22%) testing. Post METRD, the majority of patients (70%) required a higher level of care. Death before discharge (25%) was associated with need for cardiovascular support prior to RD transport (p=0.02), need for RD monitoring (p=0.02) and need for heightened RD surveillance (p=0.04). Conclusions: The majority of patients who experienced MET-RD calls came from non-intensive care units, with comorbidities and vital sign alterations prior to arrival at the RD. Risk appeared to be increased for those requiring CT and MRI. These findings suggest that prior identification of a subset of patients at risk of instability in the RD may be possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)509-518
Number of pages10
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Fingerprint

Radiology
Emergencies
Comorbidity
Tachypnea
Vital Signs
Tachycardia
Medical Records
Inpatients
Databases
Oxygen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Medical emergency team calls in the radiology department : Patient characteristics and outcomes. / Ott, Lora K.; Pinsky, Michael R.; Hoffman, Leslie A.; Clarke, Sean; Clark, Sunday; Ren, Dianxu; Hravnak, Marilyn.

In: BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol. 21, No. 6, 01.06.2012, p. 509-518.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ott, Lora K. ; Pinsky, Michael R. ; Hoffman, Leslie A. ; Clarke, Sean ; Clark, Sunday ; Ren, Dianxu ; Hravnak, Marilyn. / Medical emergency team calls in the radiology department : Patient characteristics and outcomes. In: BMJ Quality and Safety. 2012 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 509-518.
@article{65d2de2ef4b74165a6a062f57cd837ab,
title = "Medical emergency team calls in the radiology department: Patient characteristics and outcomes",
abstract = "Objective: We sought to identify the characteristics of patients who experience medical emergency team calls in the radiology department (MET-RD) and the relationship between these characteristics and patient outcomes. Design/participants: Retrospective review of 111 inpatient MET-RD calls (May 2008eApril 2010). Setting: Academic medical centre with a well established MET system. Measurements: The characteristics of patients before, during and after transport to radiology were extracted from medical records and administrative databases. These characteristics were compared between patients with good and poor outcomes. Main results: The majority of patients who experience MET-RD calls had a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4 and were from non-intensive care units (60{\%}). Almost half (43{\%}) of MET-RD calls occurred during patients'first day in hospital. Patients commonly arrived with nasal cannula oxygen (38{\%}), recent tachypnoea (28{\%}) and tachycardia (34{\%}). A minority (16{\%}) fulfilled MET call criteria in the 12 h before the MET-RD. MET-RD etiologies were cardiac (41{\%}), respiratory (29{\%}) or neurological (25{\%}), and occurred most frequently during CT (44{\%}) and MRI (22{\%}) testing. Post METRD, the majority of patients (70{\%}) required a higher level of care. Death before discharge (25{\%}) was associated with need for cardiovascular support prior to RD transport (p=0.02), need for RD monitoring (p=0.02) and need for heightened RD surveillance (p=0.04). Conclusions: The majority of patients who experienced MET-RD calls came from non-intensive care units, with comorbidities and vital sign alterations prior to arrival at the RD. Risk appeared to be increased for those requiring CT and MRI. These findings suggest that prior identification of a subset of patients at risk of instability in the RD may be possible.",
author = "Ott, {Lora K.} and Pinsky, {Michael R.} and Hoffman, {Leslie A.} and Sean Clarke and Sunday Clark and Dianxu Ren and Marilyn Hravnak",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000423",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "509--518",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical emergency team calls in the radiology department

T2 - Patient characteristics and outcomes

AU - Ott, Lora K.

AU - Pinsky, Michael R.

AU - Hoffman, Leslie A.

AU - Clarke, Sean

AU - Clark, Sunday

AU - Ren, Dianxu

AU - Hravnak, Marilyn

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Objective: We sought to identify the characteristics of patients who experience medical emergency team calls in the radiology department (MET-RD) and the relationship between these characteristics and patient outcomes. Design/participants: Retrospective review of 111 inpatient MET-RD calls (May 2008eApril 2010). Setting: Academic medical centre with a well established MET system. Measurements: The characteristics of patients before, during and after transport to radiology were extracted from medical records and administrative databases. These characteristics were compared between patients with good and poor outcomes. Main results: The majority of patients who experience MET-RD calls had a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4 and were from non-intensive care units (60%). Almost half (43%) of MET-RD calls occurred during patients'first day in hospital. Patients commonly arrived with nasal cannula oxygen (38%), recent tachypnoea (28%) and tachycardia (34%). A minority (16%) fulfilled MET call criteria in the 12 h before the MET-RD. MET-RD etiologies were cardiac (41%), respiratory (29%) or neurological (25%), and occurred most frequently during CT (44%) and MRI (22%) testing. Post METRD, the majority of patients (70%) required a higher level of care. Death before discharge (25%) was associated with need for cardiovascular support prior to RD transport (p=0.02), need for RD monitoring (p=0.02) and need for heightened RD surveillance (p=0.04). Conclusions: The majority of patients who experienced MET-RD calls came from non-intensive care units, with comorbidities and vital sign alterations prior to arrival at the RD. Risk appeared to be increased for those requiring CT and MRI. These findings suggest that prior identification of a subset of patients at risk of instability in the RD may be possible.

AB - Objective: We sought to identify the characteristics of patients who experience medical emergency team calls in the radiology department (MET-RD) and the relationship between these characteristics and patient outcomes. Design/participants: Retrospective review of 111 inpatient MET-RD calls (May 2008eApril 2010). Setting: Academic medical centre with a well established MET system. Measurements: The characteristics of patients before, during and after transport to radiology were extracted from medical records and administrative databases. These characteristics were compared between patients with good and poor outcomes. Main results: The majority of patients who experience MET-RD calls had a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4 and were from non-intensive care units (60%). Almost half (43%) of MET-RD calls occurred during patients'first day in hospital. Patients commonly arrived with nasal cannula oxygen (38%), recent tachypnoea (28%) and tachycardia (34%). A minority (16%) fulfilled MET call criteria in the 12 h before the MET-RD. MET-RD etiologies were cardiac (41%), respiratory (29%) or neurological (25%), and occurred most frequently during CT (44%) and MRI (22%) testing. Post METRD, the majority of patients (70%) required a higher level of care. Death before discharge (25%) was associated with need for cardiovascular support prior to RD transport (p=0.02), need for RD monitoring (p=0.02) and need for heightened RD surveillance (p=0.04). Conclusions: The majority of patients who experienced MET-RD calls came from non-intensive care units, with comorbidities and vital sign alterations prior to arrival at the RD. Risk appeared to be increased for those requiring CT and MRI. These findings suggest that prior identification of a subset of patients at risk of instability in the RD may be possible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861819523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861819523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000423

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000423

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 509

EP - 518

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 6

ER -