Mediator Settlement Strategies

Susan Silbey, Sally Merry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Settling cases poses a challenging task for the mediator. Most disputes are hotly contested by both parties or they would not have progressed to the point of entering the court arena or mediation. Yet, despite differences in the nature of their cases, the organization of each program we have studied, and the style of mediation predominating in each, striking similarities exist in the techniques used by the mediators to settle cases. Observation of over 40 different mediators in 175 mediation sessions in three programs suggests that in order to do the job which they are charged with accomplishing—bringing mediation cases to settlement—mediators develop a repertoire of strategies employing a variety of sources of power. Mediator strategies fall into four principal categories: presentation of self and the program, control of the process of mediation, control of the substantive issues in mediation, and activation of commitments and norms. Mediators empower themselves by claiming authority for themselves, their task, or the program based upon values external to the immediate situation, or manipulate the immediate situation so that settlement is more rather than less likely. Based upon their differential use of these strategies, mediator styles fall along a continuum between two types: bargaining and therapy. Mediation seems to range between a bargaining process conducted in the shadow of the court to a communication process which resembles therapy in its focus upon exploring and enunciating feelings.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)7-32
    Number of pages26
    JournalLaw & Policy
    Volume8
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1986

    Fingerprint

    mediation
    settling
    activation
    commitment
    organization
    communication
    Values

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Law

    Cite this

    Mediator Settlement Strategies. / Silbey, Susan ; Merry, Sally.

    In: Law & Policy, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1986, p. 7-32.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Silbey, Susan ; Merry, Sally. / Mediator Settlement Strategies. In: Law & Policy. 1986 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 7-32.
    @article{b7e30f08dff149c08755678219dc56e0,
    title = "Mediator Settlement Strategies",
    abstract = "Settling cases poses a challenging task for the mediator. Most disputes are hotly contested by both parties or they would not have progressed to the point of entering the court arena or mediation. Yet, despite differences in the nature of their cases, the organization of each program we have studied, and the style of mediation predominating in each, striking similarities exist in the techniques used by the mediators to settle cases. Observation of over 40 different mediators in 175 mediation sessions in three programs suggests that in order to do the job which they are charged with accomplishing—bringing mediation cases to settlement—mediators develop a repertoire of strategies employing a variety of sources of power. Mediator strategies fall into four principal categories: presentation of self and the program, control of the process of mediation, control of the substantive issues in mediation, and activation of commitments and norms. Mediators empower themselves by claiming authority for themselves, their task, or the program based upon values external to the immediate situation, or manipulate the immediate situation so that settlement is more rather than less likely. Based upon their differential use of these strategies, mediator styles fall along a continuum between two types: bargaining and therapy. Mediation seems to range between a bargaining process conducted in the shadow of the court to a communication process which resembles therapy in its focus upon exploring and enunciating feelings.",
    author = "Susan Silbey and Sally Merry",
    year = "1986",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9930.1986.tb00368.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "7--32",
    journal = "Law and Policy",
    issn = "0265-8240",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Mediator Settlement Strategies

    AU - Silbey, Susan

    AU - Merry, Sally

    PY - 1986

    Y1 - 1986

    N2 - Settling cases poses a challenging task for the mediator. Most disputes are hotly contested by both parties or they would not have progressed to the point of entering the court arena or mediation. Yet, despite differences in the nature of their cases, the organization of each program we have studied, and the style of mediation predominating in each, striking similarities exist in the techniques used by the mediators to settle cases. Observation of over 40 different mediators in 175 mediation sessions in three programs suggests that in order to do the job which they are charged with accomplishing—bringing mediation cases to settlement—mediators develop a repertoire of strategies employing a variety of sources of power. Mediator strategies fall into four principal categories: presentation of self and the program, control of the process of mediation, control of the substantive issues in mediation, and activation of commitments and norms. Mediators empower themselves by claiming authority for themselves, their task, or the program based upon values external to the immediate situation, or manipulate the immediate situation so that settlement is more rather than less likely. Based upon their differential use of these strategies, mediator styles fall along a continuum between two types: bargaining and therapy. Mediation seems to range between a bargaining process conducted in the shadow of the court to a communication process which resembles therapy in its focus upon exploring and enunciating feelings.

    AB - Settling cases poses a challenging task for the mediator. Most disputes are hotly contested by both parties or they would not have progressed to the point of entering the court arena or mediation. Yet, despite differences in the nature of their cases, the organization of each program we have studied, and the style of mediation predominating in each, striking similarities exist in the techniques used by the mediators to settle cases. Observation of over 40 different mediators in 175 mediation sessions in three programs suggests that in order to do the job which they are charged with accomplishing—bringing mediation cases to settlement—mediators develop a repertoire of strategies employing a variety of sources of power. Mediator strategies fall into four principal categories: presentation of self and the program, control of the process of mediation, control of the substantive issues in mediation, and activation of commitments and norms. Mediators empower themselves by claiming authority for themselves, their task, or the program based upon values external to the immediate situation, or manipulate the immediate situation so that settlement is more rather than less likely. Based upon their differential use of these strategies, mediator styles fall along a continuum between two types: bargaining and therapy. Mediation seems to range between a bargaining process conducted in the shadow of the court to a communication process which resembles therapy in its focus upon exploring and enunciating feelings.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994916134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994916134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1986.tb00368.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1986.tb00368.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 7

    EP - 32

    JO - Law and Policy

    JF - Law and Policy

    SN - 0265-8240

    IS - 1

    ER -