Media attention and the demise of agency independence

Evidence from a mass administrative reorganization in britain

Anthony Bertelli, J. Andrew Sinclair, Haram Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When administrative agencies are terminated, do they quietly fade from public view? On the one hand, the terminated agencies may have weak issue networks and agency reputations, allowing them to lose public salience. On the other, strong issue networks and agency reputations may mean that termination increases attention to the agencies, making the government pay the cost of public attention generated by the actors within the issue networks. We assess these competing claims by using a unique dataset from a recent mass reorganization of independent agencies in Britain as well as data capturing media attention to agencies in major national newspapers. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that the agencies subject to termination experience reductions in the amount of media coverage in major newspapers, disappearing from public view during the post-decision reform period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1168-1183
Number of pages16
JournalPublic Administration
Volume93
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

reorganization
reputation
newspaper
evidence
coverage
reform
costs
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Media attention and the demise of agency independence : Evidence from a mass administrative reorganization in britain. / Bertelli, Anthony; Sinclair, J. Andrew; Lee, Haram.

In: Public Administration, Vol. 93, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 1168-1183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0fe9853a3eba4fe5a6a331a49413f9d8,
title = "Media attention and the demise of agency independence: Evidence from a mass administrative reorganization in britain",
abstract = "When administrative agencies are terminated, do they quietly fade from public view? On the one hand, the terminated agencies may have weak issue networks and agency reputations, allowing them to lose public salience. On the other, strong issue networks and agency reputations may mean that termination increases attention to the agencies, making the government pay the cost of public attention generated by the actors within the issue networks. We assess these competing claims by using a unique dataset from a recent mass reorganization of independent agencies in Britain as well as data capturing media attention to agencies in major national newspapers. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that the agencies subject to termination experience reductions in the amount of media coverage in major newspapers, disappearing from public view during the post-decision reform period.",
author = "Anthony Bertelli and Sinclair, {J. Andrew} and Haram Lee",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/padm.12190",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "1168--1183",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Media attention and the demise of agency independence

T2 - Evidence from a mass administrative reorganization in britain

AU - Bertelli, Anthony

AU - Sinclair, J. Andrew

AU - Lee, Haram

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - When administrative agencies are terminated, do they quietly fade from public view? On the one hand, the terminated agencies may have weak issue networks and agency reputations, allowing them to lose public salience. On the other, strong issue networks and agency reputations may mean that termination increases attention to the agencies, making the government pay the cost of public attention generated by the actors within the issue networks. We assess these competing claims by using a unique dataset from a recent mass reorganization of independent agencies in Britain as well as data capturing media attention to agencies in major national newspapers. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that the agencies subject to termination experience reductions in the amount of media coverage in major newspapers, disappearing from public view during the post-decision reform period.

AB - When administrative agencies are terminated, do they quietly fade from public view? On the one hand, the terminated agencies may have weak issue networks and agency reputations, allowing them to lose public salience. On the other, strong issue networks and agency reputations may mean that termination increases attention to the agencies, making the government pay the cost of public attention generated by the actors within the issue networks. We assess these competing claims by using a unique dataset from a recent mass reorganization of independent agencies in Britain as well as data capturing media attention to agencies in major national newspapers. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that the agencies subject to termination experience reductions in the amount of media coverage in major newspapers, disappearing from public view during the post-decision reform period.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957725185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957725185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/padm.12190

DO - 10.1111/padm.12190

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 1168

EP - 1183

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 4

ER -