Measuring practicing clinicians’ information literacy

An exploratory analysis in the context of panel management

Brian E. Dixon, Katherine Barboza, Ashley E. Jensen, Katelyn J. Bennett, Scott Sherman, Mark D. Schwartz

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Background: As healthcare moves towards technology-driven population health management, clinicians must adopt complex digital platforms to access health information and document care. Objectives: This study explored information literacy, a set of skills required to effectively navigate population health information systems, among primary care providers in one Veterans’ Affairs (VA) medical center. Methods: Information literacy was assessed during an 8-month randomized trial that tested a population health (panel) management intervention. Providers were asked about their use and comfort with two VA digital tools for panel management at baseline, 16 weeks, and post-interven-tion. An 8-item scale (range 0–40) was used to measure information literacy (Cronbach’s α=0.84). Scores between study arms and provider types were compared using paired t-tests and ANOVAs. Associations between self-reported digital tool use and information literacy were measured via Pearson’s correlations. Results: Providers showed moderate levels of information literacy (M= 27.4, SD 6.5). There were no significant differences in mean information literacy between physicians (M=26.4, SD 6.7) and nurses (M=30.5, SD 5.2, p=0.57 for difference), or between intervention (M=28.4, SD 6.5) and control groups (M=25.1, SD 6.2, p=0.12 for difference). Information literacy was correlated with higher rates of self-reported information system usage (r=0.547, p=0.001). Clinicians identified data access, accuracy, and interpretability as potential information literacy barriers. Conclusions: While exploratory in nature, cautioning generalizability, the study suggests that measuring and improving clinicians’ information literacy may play a significant role in the implementation and use of digital information tools, as these tools are rapidly being deployed to enhance communication among care teams, improve health care outcomes, and reduce overall costs.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)149-161
    Number of pages13
    JournalApplied Clinical Informatics
    Volume8
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

    Fingerprint

    Information Literacy
    Health
    Population
    Information systems
    Patient Care Team
    Veterans
    Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
    Health care
    Health Information Systems
    Access to Information
    Communication
    Information Systems
    Primary Health Care
    Analysis of Variance
    Costs
    Nurses

    Keywords

    • Health services needs and demand
    • Human engineering or usability
    • Informatics
    • Information literacy
    • Information systems

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health Informatics
    • Computer Science Applications
    • Health Information Management

    Cite this

    Measuring practicing clinicians’ information literacy : An exploratory analysis in the context of panel management. / Dixon, Brian E.; Barboza, Katherine; Jensen, Ashley E.; Bennett, Katelyn J.; Sherman, Scott; Schwartz, Mark D.

    In: Applied Clinical Informatics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 149-161.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Dixon, Brian E. ; Barboza, Katherine ; Jensen, Ashley E. ; Bennett, Katelyn J. ; Sherman, Scott ; Schwartz, Mark D. / Measuring practicing clinicians’ information literacy : An exploratory analysis in the context of panel management. In: Applied Clinical Informatics. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 149-161.
    @article{80f6ccfdf55f4e088f32693f67bd3bc9,
    title = "Measuring practicing clinicians’ information literacy: An exploratory analysis in the context of panel management",
    abstract = "Background: As healthcare moves towards technology-driven population health management, clinicians must adopt complex digital platforms to access health information and document care. Objectives: This study explored information literacy, a set of skills required to effectively navigate population health information systems, among primary care providers in one Veterans’ Affairs (VA) medical center. Methods: Information literacy was assessed during an 8-month randomized trial that tested a population health (panel) management intervention. Providers were asked about their use and comfort with two VA digital tools for panel management at baseline, 16 weeks, and post-interven-tion. An 8-item scale (range 0–40) was used to measure information literacy (Cronbach’s α=0.84). Scores between study arms and provider types were compared using paired t-tests and ANOVAs. Associations between self-reported digital tool use and information literacy were measured via Pearson’s correlations. Results: Providers showed moderate levels of information literacy (M= 27.4, SD 6.5). There were no significant differences in mean information literacy between physicians (M=26.4, SD 6.7) and nurses (M=30.5, SD 5.2, p=0.57 for difference), or between intervention (M=28.4, SD 6.5) and control groups (M=25.1, SD 6.2, p=0.12 for difference). Information literacy was correlated with higher rates of self-reported information system usage (r=0.547, p=0.001). Clinicians identified data access, accuracy, and interpretability as potential information literacy barriers. Conclusions: While exploratory in nature, cautioning generalizability, the study suggests that measuring and improving clinicians’ information literacy may play a significant role in the implementation and use of digital information tools, as these tools are rapidly being deployed to enhance communication among care teams, improve health care outcomes, and reduce overall costs.",
    keywords = "Health services needs and demand, Human engineering or usability, Informatics, Information literacy, Information systems",
    author = "Dixon, {Brian E.} and Katherine Barboza and Jensen, {Ashley E.} and Bennett, {Katelyn J.} and Scott Sherman and Schwartz, {Mark D.}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0083",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "149--161",
    journal = "Applied Clinical Informatics",
    issn = "1869-0327",
    publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Measuring practicing clinicians’ information literacy

    T2 - An exploratory analysis in the context of panel management

    AU - Dixon, Brian E.

    AU - Barboza, Katherine

    AU - Jensen, Ashley E.

    AU - Bennett, Katelyn J.

    AU - Sherman, Scott

    AU - Schwartz, Mark D.

    PY - 2017/1/1

    Y1 - 2017/1/1

    N2 - Background: As healthcare moves towards technology-driven population health management, clinicians must adopt complex digital platforms to access health information and document care. Objectives: This study explored information literacy, a set of skills required to effectively navigate population health information systems, among primary care providers in one Veterans’ Affairs (VA) medical center. Methods: Information literacy was assessed during an 8-month randomized trial that tested a population health (panel) management intervention. Providers were asked about their use and comfort with two VA digital tools for panel management at baseline, 16 weeks, and post-interven-tion. An 8-item scale (range 0–40) was used to measure information literacy (Cronbach’s α=0.84). Scores between study arms and provider types were compared using paired t-tests and ANOVAs. Associations between self-reported digital tool use and information literacy were measured via Pearson’s correlations. Results: Providers showed moderate levels of information literacy (M= 27.4, SD 6.5). There were no significant differences in mean information literacy between physicians (M=26.4, SD 6.7) and nurses (M=30.5, SD 5.2, p=0.57 for difference), or between intervention (M=28.4, SD 6.5) and control groups (M=25.1, SD 6.2, p=0.12 for difference). Information literacy was correlated with higher rates of self-reported information system usage (r=0.547, p=0.001). Clinicians identified data access, accuracy, and interpretability as potential information literacy barriers. Conclusions: While exploratory in nature, cautioning generalizability, the study suggests that measuring and improving clinicians’ information literacy may play a significant role in the implementation and use of digital information tools, as these tools are rapidly being deployed to enhance communication among care teams, improve health care outcomes, and reduce overall costs.

    AB - Background: As healthcare moves towards technology-driven population health management, clinicians must adopt complex digital platforms to access health information and document care. Objectives: This study explored information literacy, a set of skills required to effectively navigate population health information systems, among primary care providers in one Veterans’ Affairs (VA) medical center. Methods: Information literacy was assessed during an 8-month randomized trial that tested a population health (panel) management intervention. Providers were asked about their use and comfort with two VA digital tools for panel management at baseline, 16 weeks, and post-interven-tion. An 8-item scale (range 0–40) was used to measure information literacy (Cronbach’s α=0.84). Scores between study arms and provider types were compared using paired t-tests and ANOVAs. Associations between self-reported digital tool use and information literacy were measured via Pearson’s correlations. Results: Providers showed moderate levels of information literacy (M= 27.4, SD 6.5). There were no significant differences in mean information literacy between physicians (M=26.4, SD 6.7) and nurses (M=30.5, SD 5.2, p=0.57 for difference), or between intervention (M=28.4, SD 6.5) and control groups (M=25.1, SD 6.2, p=0.12 for difference). Information literacy was correlated with higher rates of self-reported information system usage (r=0.547, p=0.001). Clinicians identified data access, accuracy, and interpretability as potential information literacy barriers. Conclusions: While exploratory in nature, cautioning generalizability, the study suggests that measuring and improving clinicians’ information literacy may play a significant role in the implementation and use of digital information tools, as these tools are rapidly being deployed to enhance communication among care teams, improve health care outcomes, and reduce overall costs.

    KW - Health services needs and demand

    KW - Human engineering or usability

    KW - Informatics

    KW - Information literacy

    KW - Information systems

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013170862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013170862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0083

    DO - 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-RA-0083

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 149

    EP - 161

    JO - Applied Clinical Informatics

    JF - Applied Clinical Informatics

    SN - 1869-0327

    IS - 1

    ER -