Measuring equity and adequacy in school finance

Thomas A. Downes, Leanna Stiefel

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Over the past 45 years, researchers have devoted significant effort to developing ways to measure two important goals of state school finance systems: the promotion of equity and, more recently, the provision of adequacy. Equity, as the term is traditionally used in the school finance literature, is a relative concept that is based on comparisons of inputs (oft en aggregated into a per-pupil spending measure across school districts). 1 Th us, an equitable finance system is one that reduces to a “reasonable level” the disparity in perpupil spending across a state’s districts. Adequacy of funding, in contrast, is an absolute concept that requires that spending reach a minimum threshold that provides sufficient spending to give students in each district an opportunity to meet state standards of performance. Th us, adequacy focuses only on the bottom part of the distribution of spending, with no attention to variations above the threshold needed for adequacy. Although general definitions are straightforward, quantifying measures of either the equity or the adequacy of a school finance system is a challenge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, Second Edition
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages244-259
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781135041069
ISBN (Print)9780415838016
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

financial system
finance
equity
district
school
pupil
promotion
funding
performance
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Downes, T. A., & Stiefel, L. (2014). Measuring equity and adequacy in school finance. In Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, Second Edition (pp. 244-259). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788684

Measuring equity and adequacy in school finance. / Downes, Thomas A.; Stiefel, Leanna.

Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, Second Edition. Taylor and Francis, 2014. p. 244-259.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Downes, TA & Stiefel, L 2014, Measuring equity and adequacy in school finance. in Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, Second Edition. Taylor and Francis, pp. 244-259. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788684
Downes TA, Stiefel L. Measuring equity and adequacy in school finance. In Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, Second Edition. Taylor and Francis. 2014. p. 244-259 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788684
Downes, Thomas A. ; Stiefel, Leanna. / Measuring equity and adequacy in school finance. Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, Second Edition. Taylor and Francis, 2014. pp. 244-259
@inbook{b3eec8d2c5504057a2e3e764095b1b8a,
title = "Measuring equity and adequacy in school finance",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION Over the past 45 years, researchers have devoted significant effort to developing ways to measure two important goals of state school finance systems: the promotion of equity and, more recently, the provision of adequacy. Equity, as the term is traditionally used in the school finance literature, is a relative concept that is based on comparisons of inputs (oft en aggregated into a per-pupil spending measure across school districts). 1 Th us, an equitable finance system is one that reduces to a “reasonable level” the disparity in perpupil spending across a state’s districts. Adequacy of funding, in contrast, is an absolute concept that requires that spending reach a minimum threshold that provides sufficient spending to give students in each district an opportunity to meet state standards of performance. Th us, adequacy focuses only on the bottom part of the distribution of spending, with no attention to variations above the threshold needed for adequacy. Although general definitions are straightforward, quantifying measures of either the equity or the adequacy of a school finance system is a challenge.",
author = "Downes, {Thomas A.} and Leanna Stiefel",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203788684",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780415838016",
pages = "244--259",
booktitle = "Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, Second Edition",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Measuring equity and adequacy in school finance

AU - Downes, Thomas A.

AU - Stiefel, Leanna

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION Over the past 45 years, researchers have devoted significant effort to developing ways to measure two important goals of state school finance systems: the promotion of equity and, more recently, the provision of adequacy. Equity, as the term is traditionally used in the school finance literature, is a relative concept that is based on comparisons of inputs (oft en aggregated into a per-pupil spending measure across school districts). 1 Th us, an equitable finance system is one that reduces to a “reasonable level” the disparity in perpupil spending across a state’s districts. Adequacy of funding, in contrast, is an absolute concept that requires that spending reach a minimum threshold that provides sufficient spending to give students in each district an opportunity to meet state standards of performance. Th us, adequacy focuses only on the bottom part of the distribution of spending, with no attention to variations above the threshold needed for adequacy. Although general definitions are straightforward, quantifying measures of either the equity or the adequacy of a school finance system is a challenge.

AB - INTRODUCTION Over the past 45 years, researchers have devoted significant effort to developing ways to measure two important goals of state school finance systems: the promotion of equity and, more recently, the provision of adequacy. Equity, as the term is traditionally used in the school finance literature, is a relative concept that is based on comparisons of inputs (oft en aggregated into a per-pupil spending measure across school districts). 1 Th us, an equitable finance system is one that reduces to a “reasonable level” the disparity in perpupil spending across a state’s districts. Adequacy of funding, in contrast, is an absolute concept that requires that spending reach a minimum threshold that provides sufficient spending to give students in each district an opportunity to meet state standards of performance. Th us, adequacy focuses only on the bottom part of the distribution of spending, with no attention to variations above the threshold needed for adequacy. Although general definitions are straightforward, quantifying measures of either the equity or the adequacy of a school finance system is a challenge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064363091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064363091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203788684

DO - 10.4324/9780203788684

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85064363091

SN - 9780415838016

SP - 244

EP - 259

BT - Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy, Second Edition

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -