Measurement of defenses in special populations: Revision of the defense mechanisms inventory

Juni Samuel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Defense Mechanisms Inventory (DMI) has been standardized for the general and minority populations and used in counseling settings and in scores of interpersonal psychology studies. Guidance and research experience with the DMI has indicated that the requirement of choosing most representative and least representative item options can introduce inaccuracies and promote peculiar response sets, particularly among certain respondents with learning disabilities and those with lower reading skills or poor educational backgrounds. The DMI protocols of 504 undergraduate college students and 229 minority youngsters were rescored, utilizing only the most representative responses. In addition, data were collected from 32 graduate students using modified instructions (asking for most representative choices only), as well as standard instructions. Data were also analyzed from 127 male drug detoxification patients who completed the DMI with modified instructions. The reliability and factor structure of the defensive and object-relations scores were compared to standardization data for the traditional scoring method. Results point to the merits of using only the most representative instruction with special populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)230-244
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Research in Personality
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Defense Mechanisms
Equipment and Supplies
Population
Students
Learning Disorders
Counseling
Reading
Research Design
Psychology
Research
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Measurement of defenses in special populations : Revision of the defense mechanisms inventory. / Samuel, Juni.

In: Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1994, p. 230-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e238e5f455447c993290908751aa1d7,
title = "Measurement of defenses in special populations: Revision of the defense mechanisms inventory",
abstract = "The Defense Mechanisms Inventory (DMI) has been standardized for the general and minority populations and used in counseling settings and in scores of interpersonal psychology studies. Guidance and research experience with the DMI has indicated that the requirement of choosing most representative and least representative item options can introduce inaccuracies and promote peculiar response sets, particularly among certain respondents with learning disabilities and those with lower reading skills or poor educational backgrounds. The DMI protocols of 504 undergraduate college students and 229 minority youngsters were rescored, utilizing only the most representative responses. In addition, data were collected from 32 graduate students using modified instructions (asking for most representative choices only), as well as standard instructions. Data were also analyzed from 127 male drug detoxification patients who completed the DMI with modified instructions. The reliability and factor structure of the defensive and object-relations scores were compared to standardization data for the traditional scoring method. Results point to the merits of using only the most representative instruction with special populations.",
author = "Juni Samuel",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1006/jpre.1994.1017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "230--244",
journal = "Journal of Research in Personality",
issn = "0092-6566",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of defenses in special populations

T2 - Revision of the defense mechanisms inventory

AU - Samuel, Juni

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - The Defense Mechanisms Inventory (DMI) has been standardized for the general and minority populations and used in counseling settings and in scores of interpersonal psychology studies. Guidance and research experience with the DMI has indicated that the requirement of choosing most representative and least representative item options can introduce inaccuracies and promote peculiar response sets, particularly among certain respondents with learning disabilities and those with lower reading skills or poor educational backgrounds. The DMI protocols of 504 undergraduate college students and 229 minority youngsters were rescored, utilizing only the most representative responses. In addition, data were collected from 32 graduate students using modified instructions (asking for most representative choices only), as well as standard instructions. Data were also analyzed from 127 male drug detoxification patients who completed the DMI with modified instructions. The reliability and factor structure of the defensive and object-relations scores were compared to standardization data for the traditional scoring method. Results point to the merits of using only the most representative instruction with special populations.

AB - The Defense Mechanisms Inventory (DMI) has been standardized for the general and minority populations and used in counseling settings and in scores of interpersonal psychology studies. Guidance and research experience with the DMI has indicated that the requirement of choosing most representative and least representative item options can introduce inaccuracies and promote peculiar response sets, particularly among certain respondents with learning disabilities and those with lower reading skills or poor educational backgrounds. The DMI protocols of 504 undergraduate college students and 229 minority youngsters were rescored, utilizing only the most representative responses. In addition, data were collected from 32 graduate students using modified instructions (asking for most representative choices only), as well as standard instructions. Data were also analyzed from 127 male drug detoxification patients who completed the DMI with modified instructions. The reliability and factor structure of the defensive and object-relations scores were compared to standardization data for the traditional scoring method. Results point to the merits of using only the most representative instruction with special populations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346399286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346399286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jpre.1994.1017

DO - 10.1006/jpre.1994.1017

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 230

EP - 244

JO - Journal of Research in Personality

JF - Journal of Research in Personality

SN - 0092-6566

IS - 2

ER -