Measurement error and its impact on the estimated relationship between dust lead and children's blood lead

Mary J. Emond, Bruce P. Lanphear, Arthur Watts, Shirley Eberly, Michael Weitzman, Tanner M. Martin, Thomas Clarkson, Nancy L. Winter, Leslie Aptez, Mary Emond, Benjamin Yakir, Warren Galke, David Jacobs, Tom Matte, Scott Clark, Mark Farfel, John Graef, Joel Schwartz, Ellen Silbergeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. Lead-contaminated house dust is a major contributor to lead intake among urban children, but the reliabilities of various dust lead measurement methods and their impact on the estimated correlations between dust lead and children's blood lead levels are unknown. Methods. Repeated field measurements of lead-contaminated dust from children's homes were taken from 16 housing units using five dust lead measurement methods. Estimates of measurement error were used to obtain reliability ratios for the dust lead measurements, which were then used to correct estimated correlations between lead-contaminated dust and children's blood lead. Results. Reliability varied over methods and surface types (from 0.0 to 0.8), but wipe loading and the BRM vacuum loading methods generally had greater reliability. Technician effects, inadvertent field exposure to lead, contamination of collection equipment, and laboratory instrument error were found to contribute little to total measurement error. Corrected correlations between blood lead and wipe loading measurements were 7 to 104% higher than uncorrected correlations. The multiple R2 and partial R2 for a wipe composite measurement in a multivariate regression model increased from 0.43 to 0.64 and from 0.053 to 0.26, respectively, after correction for measurement error bias. Conclusions. Variation in lead deposition within small areas and variations in collection inherent to the devices are major contributors to measurement error. Measurement error causes dramatic underestimation of correlation between lead-contaminated house dust and children's blood lead.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)82-92
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Research
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Measurement errors
Dust
Blood
blood
dust
measurement method
Equipment Contamination
Instrument errors
Small-Area Analysis
Lead
Vacuum
Contamination
Equipment and Supplies
Composite materials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Measurement error and its impact on the estimated relationship between dust lead and children's blood lead. / Emond, Mary J.; Lanphear, Bruce P.; Watts, Arthur; Eberly, Shirley; Weitzman, Michael; Martin, Tanner M.; Clarkson, Thomas; Winter, Nancy L.; Aptez, Leslie; Emond, Mary; Yakir, Benjamin; Galke, Warren; Jacobs, David; Matte, Tom; Clark, Scott; Farfel, Mark; Graef, John; Schwartz, Joel; Silbergeld, Ellen.

In: Environmental Research, Vol. 72, No. 1, 01.01.1997, p. 82-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Emond, MJ, Lanphear, BP, Watts, A, Eberly, S, Weitzman, M, Martin, TM, Clarkson, T, Winter, NL, Aptez, L, Emond, M, Yakir, B, Galke, W, Jacobs, D, Matte, T, Clark, S, Farfel, M, Graef, J, Schwartz, J & Silbergeld, E 1997, 'Measurement error and its impact on the estimated relationship between dust lead and children's blood lead', Environmental Research, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1996.3693
Emond, Mary J. ; Lanphear, Bruce P. ; Watts, Arthur ; Eberly, Shirley ; Weitzman, Michael ; Martin, Tanner M. ; Clarkson, Thomas ; Winter, Nancy L. ; Aptez, Leslie ; Emond, Mary ; Yakir, Benjamin ; Galke, Warren ; Jacobs, David ; Matte, Tom ; Clark, Scott ; Farfel, Mark ; Graef, John ; Schwartz, Joel ; Silbergeld, Ellen. / Measurement error and its impact on the estimated relationship between dust lead and children's blood lead. In: Environmental Research. 1997 ; Vol. 72, No. 1. pp. 82-92.
@article{a5af85e1bbea43d8badc8fe86974080f,
title = "Measurement error and its impact on the estimated relationship between dust lead and children's blood lead",
abstract = "Objective. Lead-contaminated house dust is a major contributor to lead intake among urban children, but the reliabilities of various dust lead measurement methods and their impact on the estimated correlations between dust lead and children's blood lead levels are unknown. Methods. Repeated field measurements of lead-contaminated dust from children's homes were taken from 16 housing units using five dust lead measurement methods. Estimates of measurement error were used to obtain reliability ratios for the dust lead measurements, which were then used to correct estimated correlations between lead-contaminated dust and children's blood lead. Results. Reliability varied over methods and surface types (from 0.0 to 0.8), but wipe loading and the BRM vacuum loading methods generally had greater reliability. Technician effects, inadvertent field exposure to lead, contamination of collection equipment, and laboratory instrument error were found to contribute little to total measurement error. Corrected correlations between blood lead and wipe loading measurements were 7 to 104{\%} higher than uncorrected correlations. The multiple R2 and partial R2 for a wipe composite measurement in a multivariate regression model increased from 0.43 to 0.64 and from 0.053 to 0.26, respectively, after correction for measurement error bias. Conclusions. Variation in lead deposition within small areas and variations in collection inherent to the devices are major contributors to measurement error. Measurement error causes dramatic underestimation of correlation between lead-contaminated house dust and children's blood lead.",
author = "Emond, {Mary J.} and Lanphear, {Bruce P.} and Arthur Watts and Shirley Eberly and Michael Weitzman and Martin, {Tanner M.} and Thomas Clarkson and Winter, {Nancy L.} and Leslie Aptez and Mary Emond and Benjamin Yakir and Warren Galke and David Jacobs and Tom Matte and Scott Clark and Mark Farfel and John Graef and Joel Schwartz and Ellen Silbergeld",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/enrs.1996.3693",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "82--92",
journal = "Environmental Research",
issn = "0013-9351",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement error and its impact on the estimated relationship between dust lead and children's blood lead

AU - Emond, Mary J.

AU - Lanphear, Bruce P.

AU - Watts, Arthur

AU - Eberly, Shirley

AU - Weitzman, Michael

AU - Martin, Tanner M.

AU - Clarkson, Thomas

AU - Winter, Nancy L.

AU - Aptez, Leslie

AU - Emond, Mary

AU - Yakir, Benjamin

AU - Galke, Warren

AU - Jacobs, David

AU - Matte, Tom

AU - Clark, Scott

AU - Farfel, Mark

AU - Graef, John

AU - Schwartz, Joel

AU - Silbergeld, Ellen

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Objective. Lead-contaminated house dust is a major contributor to lead intake among urban children, but the reliabilities of various dust lead measurement methods and their impact on the estimated correlations between dust lead and children's blood lead levels are unknown. Methods. Repeated field measurements of lead-contaminated dust from children's homes were taken from 16 housing units using five dust lead measurement methods. Estimates of measurement error were used to obtain reliability ratios for the dust lead measurements, which were then used to correct estimated correlations between lead-contaminated dust and children's blood lead. Results. Reliability varied over methods and surface types (from 0.0 to 0.8), but wipe loading and the BRM vacuum loading methods generally had greater reliability. Technician effects, inadvertent field exposure to lead, contamination of collection equipment, and laboratory instrument error were found to contribute little to total measurement error. Corrected correlations between blood lead and wipe loading measurements were 7 to 104% higher than uncorrected correlations. The multiple R2 and partial R2 for a wipe composite measurement in a multivariate regression model increased from 0.43 to 0.64 and from 0.053 to 0.26, respectively, after correction for measurement error bias. Conclusions. Variation in lead deposition within small areas and variations in collection inherent to the devices are major contributors to measurement error. Measurement error causes dramatic underestimation of correlation between lead-contaminated house dust and children's blood lead.

AB - Objective. Lead-contaminated house dust is a major contributor to lead intake among urban children, but the reliabilities of various dust lead measurement methods and their impact on the estimated correlations between dust lead and children's blood lead levels are unknown. Methods. Repeated field measurements of lead-contaminated dust from children's homes were taken from 16 housing units using five dust lead measurement methods. Estimates of measurement error were used to obtain reliability ratios for the dust lead measurements, which were then used to correct estimated correlations between lead-contaminated dust and children's blood lead. Results. Reliability varied over methods and surface types (from 0.0 to 0.8), but wipe loading and the BRM vacuum loading methods generally had greater reliability. Technician effects, inadvertent field exposure to lead, contamination of collection equipment, and laboratory instrument error were found to contribute little to total measurement error. Corrected correlations between blood lead and wipe loading measurements were 7 to 104% higher than uncorrected correlations. The multiple R2 and partial R2 for a wipe composite measurement in a multivariate regression model increased from 0.43 to 0.64 and from 0.053 to 0.26, respectively, after correction for measurement error bias. Conclusions. Variation in lead deposition within small areas and variations in collection inherent to the devices are major contributors to measurement error. Measurement error causes dramatic underestimation of correlation between lead-contaminated house dust and children's blood lead.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031035009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031035009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/enrs.1996.3693

DO - 10.1006/enrs.1996.3693

M3 - Article

C2 - 9012375

AN - SCOPUS:0031035009

VL - 72

SP - 82

EP - 92

JO - Environmental Research

JF - Environmental Research

SN - 0013-9351

IS - 1

ER -