Mathematical modelling in tobacco control research

Protocol for a systematic review

Shari Feirman, Elisabeth Donaldson, Jennifer Pearson, Grace Zawistowski, Raymond Niaura, Allison Glasser, Andrea C. Villanti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco control researchers have recently become more interested in systems science methods and mathematical modelling techniques as a means to understand how complex inter-relationships among various factors translate into population-level summaries of tobacco use prevalence and its associated medical and social costs. However, there is currently no resource that provides an overview of how mathematical modelling has been used in tobacco control research. This review will provide a summary of studies that employ modelling techniques to predict tobacco-related outcomes. It will also propose a conceptual framework for grouping existing modelling studies by their objectives. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a systematic review that is informed by Cochrane procedures, as well as guidelines developed for reviews that are specifically intended to inform policy and programme decision-making. We will search 5 electronic databases to identify studies that use a mathematical model to project a tobacco-related outcome. An online data extraction form will be developed based on the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices. We will perform a qualitative synthesis of included studies. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this study. An initial paper, published in a peer-reviewed journal, will provide an overview of our findings. Subsequent papers will provide greater detail on results within each study objective category and an assessment of the risk of bias of these grouped studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere007269
JournalBMJ Open
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Tobacco
Research
Tobacco Use
Ethics
Decision Making
Theoretical Models
Research Personnel
Databases
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Feirman, S., Donaldson, E., Pearson, J., Zawistowski, G., Niaura, R., Glasser, A., & Villanti, A. C. (2015). Mathematical modelling in tobacco control research: Protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open, 5(4), [e007269]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007269

Mathematical modelling in tobacco control research : Protocol for a systematic review. / Feirman, Shari; Donaldson, Elisabeth; Pearson, Jennifer; Zawistowski, Grace; Niaura, Raymond; Glasser, Allison; Villanti, Andrea C.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 5, No. 4, e007269, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feirman, S, Donaldson, E, Pearson, J, Zawistowski, G, Niaura, R, Glasser, A & Villanti, AC 2015, 'Mathematical modelling in tobacco control research: Protocol for a systematic review', BMJ Open, vol. 5, no. 4, e007269. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007269
Feirman, Shari ; Donaldson, Elisabeth ; Pearson, Jennifer ; Zawistowski, Grace ; Niaura, Raymond ; Glasser, Allison ; Villanti, Andrea C. / Mathematical modelling in tobacco control research : Protocol for a systematic review. In: BMJ Open. 2015 ; Vol. 5, No. 4.
@article{061281cb6bd14a949c2e00fe61030ec9,
title = "Mathematical modelling in tobacco control research: Protocol for a systematic review",
abstract = "Introduction: Tobacco control researchers have recently become more interested in systems science methods and mathematical modelling techniques as a means to understand how complex inter-relationships among various factors translate into population-level summaries of tobacco use prevalence and its associated medical and social costs. However, there is currently no resource that provides an overview of how mathematical modelling has been used in tobacco control research. This review will provide a summary of studies that employ modelling techniques to predict tobacco-related outcomes. It will also propose a conceptual framework for grouping existing modelling studies by their objectives. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a systematic review that is informed by Cochrane procedures, as well as guidelines developed for reviews that are specifically intended to inform policy and programme decision-making. We will search 5 electronic databases to identify studies that use a mathematical model to project a tobacco-related outcome. An online data extraction form will be developed based on the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices. We will perform a qualitative synthesis of included studies. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this study. An initial paper, published in a peer-reviewed journal, will provide an overview of our findings. Subsequent papers will provide greater detail on results within each study objective category and an assessment of the risk of bias of these grouped studies.",
author = "Shari Feirman and Elisabeth Donaldson and Jennifer Pearson and Grace Zawistowski and Raymond Niaura and Allison Glasser and Villanti, {Andrea C.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007269",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mathematical modelling in tobacco control research

T2 - Protocol for a systematic review

AU - Feirman, Shari

AU - Donaldson, Elisabeth

AU - Pearson, Jennifer

AU - Zawistowski, Grace

AU - Niaura, Raymond

AU - Glasser, Allison

AU - Villanti, Andrea C.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Introduction: Tobacco control researchers have recently become more interested in systems science methods and mathematical modelling techniques as a means to understand how complex inter-relationships among various factors translate into population-level summaries of tobacco use prevalence and its associated medical and social costs. However, there is currently no resource that provides an overview of how mathematical modelling has been used in tobacco control research. This review will provide a summary of studies that employ modelling techniques to predict tobacco-related outcomes. It will also propose a conceptual framework for grouping existing modelling studies by their objectives. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a systematic review that is informed by Cochrane procedures, as well as guidelines developed for reviews that are specifically intended to inform policy and programme decision-making. We will search 5 electronic databases to identify studies that use a mathematical model to project a tobacco-related outcome. An online data extraction form will be developed based on the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices. We will perform a qualitative synthesis of included studies. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this study. An initial paper, published in a peer-reviewed journal, will provide an overview of our findings. Subsequent papers will provide greater detail on results within each study objective category and an assessment of the risk of bias of these grouped studies.

AB - Introduction: Tobacco control researchers have recently become more interested in systems science methods and mathematical modelling techniques as a means to understand how complex inter-relationships among various factors translate into population-level summaries of tobacco use prevalence and its associated medical and social costs. However, there is currently no resource that provides an overview of how mathematical modelling has been used in tobacco control research. This review will provide a summary of studies that employ modelling techniques to predict tobacco-related outcomes. It will also propose a conceptual framework for grouping existing modelling studies by their objectives. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a systematic review that is informed by Cochrane procedures, as well as guidelines developed for reviews that are specifically intended to inform policy and programme decision-making. We will search 5 electronic databases to identify studies that use a mathematical model to project a tobacco-related outcome. An online data extraction form will be developed based on the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices. We will perform a qualitative synthesis of included studies. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this study. An initial paper, published in a peer-reviewed journal, will provide an overview of our findings. Subsequent papers will provide greater detail on results within each study objective category and an assessment of the risk of bias of these grouped studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928266302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928266302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007269

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007269

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 4

M1 - e007269

ER -