Mass fatality preparedness among medical examiners/coroners in the United States: A cross-sectional study

Robyn Gershon, Mark G. Orr, Qi Zhi, Jacqueline A. Merrill, Daniel Y. Chen, Halley E.M. Riley, Martin F. Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: In the United States (US), Medical Examiners and Coroners (ME/Cs) have the legal authority for the management of mass fatality incidents (MFI). Yet, preparedness and operational capabilities in this sector remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was twofold; first, to identify appropriate measures of preparedness, and second, to assess preparedness levels and factors significantly associated with preparedness. Methods: Three separate checklists were developed to measure different aspects of preparedness: MFI Plan Elements, Operational Capabilities, and Pre-existing Resource Networks. Using a cross-sectional study design, data on these and other variables of interest were collected in 2014 from a national convenience sample of ME/C using an internet-based, anonymous survey. Preparedness levels were determined and compared across Federal Regions and in relation to the number of Presidential Disaster Declarations, also by Federal Region. Bivariate logistic and multivariable models estimated the associations between organizational characteristics and relative preparedness. Results: A large proportion (42%) of respondents reported that less than 25 additional fatalities over a 48-hour period would exceed their response capacities. The preparedness constructs measured three related, yet distinct, aspects of preparedness, with scores highly variable and generally suboptimal. Median scores for the three preparedness measures also varied across Federal Regions and as compared to the number of Presidential Declared Disasters, also by Federal Region. Capacity was especially limited for activating missing persons call centers, launching public communications, especially via social media, and identifying temporary interment sites. The provision of staff training was the only factor studied that was significantly (positively) associated (p < .05) with all three preparedness measures. Although ME/Cs ranked local partners, such as Offices of Emergency Management, first responders, and funeral homes, as the most important sources of assistance, a sizeable proportion (72%) expected federal assistance. Conclusions: The three measures of MFI preparedness allowed for a broad and comprehensive assessment of preparedness. In the future, these measures can serve as useful benchmarks or criteria for assessing ME/Cs preparedness. The study findings suggest multiple opportunities for improvement, including the development and implementation of national strategies to ensure uniform standards for MFI management across all jurisdictions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1275
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Coroners and Medical Examiners
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disasters
Emergency Responders
Office Management
Social Media
Benchmarking
Checklist
Internet
Logistic Models
Communication
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Ability and willingness
  • CBRNE
  • Coroners
  • Death care
  • Disasters
  • Mass fatality incident
  • Medical examiners
  • Preparedness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Mass fatality preparedness among medical examiners/coroners in the United States : A cross-sectional study. / Gershon, Robyn; Orr, Mark G.; Zhi, Qi; Merrill, Jacqueline A.; Chen, Daniel Y.; Riley, Halley E.M.; Sherman, Martin F.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1275, 01.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gershon, Robyn ; Orr, Mark G. ; Zhi, Qi ; Merrill, Jacqueline A. ; Chen, Daniel Y. ; Riley, Halley E.M. ; Sherman, Martin F. / Mass fatality preparedness among medical examiners/coroners in the United States : A cross-sectional study. In: BMC Public Health. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 1.
@article{aa8c80366b214d6f9051f06407a77b3f,
title = "Mass fatality preparedness among medical examiners/coroners in the United States: A cross-sectional study",
abstract = "Background: In the United States (US), Medical Examiners and Coroners (ME/Cs) have the legal authority for the management of mass fatality incidents (MFI). Yet, preparedness and operational capabilities in this sector remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was twofold; first, to identify appropriate measures of preparedness, and second, to assess preparedness levels and factors significantly associated with preparedness. Methods: Three separate checklists were developed to measure different aspects of preparedness: MFI Plan Elements, Operational Capabilities, and Pre-existing Resource Networks. Using a cross-sectional study design, data on these and other variables of interest were collected in 2014 from a national convenience sample of ME/C using an internet-based, anonymous survey. Preparedness levels were determined and compared across Federal Regions and in relation to the number of Presidential Disaster Declarations, also by Federal Region. Bivariate logistic and multivariable models estimated the associations between organizational characteristics and relative preparedness. Results: A large proportion (42{\%}) of respondents reported that less than 25 additional fatalities over a 48-hour period would exceed their response capacities. The preparedness constructs measured three related, yet distinct, aspects of preparedness, with scores highly variable and generally suboptimal. Median scores for the three preparedness measures also varied across Federal Regions and as compared to the number of Presidential Declared Disasters, also by Federal Region. Capacity was especially limited for activating missing persons call centers, launching public communications, especially via social media, and identifying temporary interment sites. The provision of staff training was the only factor studied that was significantly (positively) associated (p < .05) with all three preparedness measures. Although ME/Cs ranked local partners, such as Offices of Emergency Management, first responders, and funeral homes, as the most important sources of assistance, a sizeable proportion (72{\%}) expected federal assistance. Conclusions: The three measures of MFI preparedness allowed for a broad and comprehensive assessment of preparedness. In the future, these measures can serve as useful benchmarks or criteria for assessing ME/Cs preparedness. The study findings suggest multiple opportunities for improvement, including the development and implementation of national strategies to ensure uniform standards for MFI management across all jurisdictions.",
keywords = "Ability and willingness, CBRNE, Coroners, Death care, Disasters, Mass fatality incident, Medical examiners, Preparedness",
author = "Robyn Gershon and Orr, {Mark G.} and Qi Zhi and Merrill, {Jacqueline A.} and Chen, {Daniel Y.} and Riley, {Halley E.M.} and Sherman, {Martin F.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2458-14-1275",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mass fatality preparedness among medical examiners/coroners in the United States

T2 - A cross-sectional study

AU - Gershon, Robyn

AU - Orr, Mark G.

AU - Zhi, Qi

AU - Merrill, Jacqueline A.

AU - Chen, Daniel Y.

AU - Riley, Halley E.M.

AU - Sherman, Martin F.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background: In the United States (US), Medical Examiners and Coroners (ME/Cs) have the legal authority for the management of mass fatality incidents (MFI). Yet, preparedness and operational capabilities in this sector remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was twofold; first, to identify appropriate measures of preparedness, and second, to assess preparedness levels and factors significantly associated with preparedness. Methods: Three separate checklists were developed to measure different aspects of preparedness: MFI Plan Elements, Operational Capabilities, and Pre-existing Resource Networks. Using a cross-sectional study design, data on these and other variables of interest were collected in 2014 from a national convenience sample of ME/C using an internet-based, anonymous survey. Preparedness levels were determined and compared across Federal Regions and in relation to the number of Presidential Disaster Declarations, also by Federal Region. Bivariate logistic and multivariable models estimated the associations between organizational characteristics and relative preparedness. Results: A large proportion (42%) of respondents reported that less than 25 additional fatalities over a 48-hour period would exceed their response capacities. The preparedness constructs measured three related, yet distinct, aspects of preparedness, with scores highly variable and generally suboptimal. Median scores for the three preparedness measures also varied across Federal Regions and as compared to the number of Presidential Declared Disasters, also by Federal Region. Capacity was especially limited for activating missing persons call centers, launching public communications, especially via social media, and identifying temporary interment sites. The provision of staff training was the only factor studied that was significantly (positively) associated (p < .05) with all three preparedness measures. Although ME/Cs ranked local partners, such as Offices of Emergency Management, first responders, and funeral homes, as the most important sources of assistance, a sizeable proportion (72%) expected federal assistance. Conclusions: The three measures of MFI preparedness allowed for a broad and comprehensive assessment of preparedness. In the future, these measures can serve as useful benchmarks or criteria for assessing ME/Cs preparedness. The study findings suggest multiple opportunities for improvement, including the development and implementation of national strategies to ensure uniform standards for MFI management across all jurisdictions.

AB - Background: In the United States (US), Medical Examiners and Coroners (ME/Cs) have the legal authority for the management of mass fatality incidents (MFI). Yet, preparedness and operational capabilities in this sector remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was twofold; first, to identify appropriate measures of preparedness, and second, to assess preparedness levels and factors significantly associated with preparedness. Methods: Three separate checklists were developed to measure different aspects of preparedness: MFI Plan Elements, Operational Capabilities, and Pre-existing Resource Networks. Using a cross-sectional study design, data on these and other variables of interest were collected in 2014 from a national convenience sample of ME/C using an internet-based, anonymous survey. Preparedness levels were determined and compared across Federal Regions and in relation to the number of Presidential Disaster Declarations, also by Federal Region. Bivariate logistic and multivariable models estimated the associations between organizational characteristics and relative preparedness. Results: A large proportion (42%) of respondents reported that less than 25 additional fatalities over a 48-hour period would exceed their response capacities. The preparedness constructs measured three related, yet distinct, aspects of preparedness, with scores highly variable and generally suboptimal. Median scores for the three preparedness measures also varied across Federal Regions and as compared to the number of Presidential Declared Disasters, also by Federal Region. Capacity was especially limited for activating missing persons call centers, launching public communications, especially via social media, and identifying temporary interment sites. The provision of staff training was the only factor studied that was significantly (positively) associated (p < .05) with all three preparedness measures. Although ME/Cs ranked local partners, such as Offices of Emergency Management, first responders, and funeral homes, as the most important sources of assistance, a sizeable proportion (72%) expected federal assistance. Conclusions: The three measures of MFI preparedness allowed for a broad and comprehensive assessment of preparedness. In the future, these measures can serve as useful benchmarks or criteria for assessing ME/Cs preparedness. The study findings suggest multiple opportunities for improvement, including the development and implementation of national strategies to ensure uniform standards for MFI management across all jurisdictions.

KW - Ability and willingness

KW - CBRNE

KW - Coroners

KW - Death care

KW - Disasters

KW - Mass fatality incident

KW - Medical examiners

KW - Preparedness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924084445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924084445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1275

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1275

M3 - Article

C2 - 25511819

AN - SCOPUS:84924084445

VL - 14

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 1275

ER -