Managing nicotine without smoke to save lives now

Evidence for harm minimization

David B. Abrams, Allison M. Glasser, Andrea C. Villanti, Jennifer L. Pearson, Shyanika Rose, Raymond S. Niaura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Tobacco control has made strides in prevention and cessation, but deaths will not decline rapidly without massive behavior change. Currently, inhaled smoke from combusting tobacco is chiefly responsible for prematurely killing 7.2 million people worldwide and 530,000 in the United States annually. An array of noncombustible nicotine products (NNPs) has emerged and has disrupted the marketplace. Saving lives more speedily will require societal acceptance of locating a “sweet spot” within a three-dimensional framework where NNPs are simultaneously: 1. Less toxic, 2. Appealing (can reach smokers at scale), and 3. Satisfying (adequate nicotine delivery) to displace smoking. For this harm minimization framework to eliminate smoking, a laser focus on “smoking control” (not general tobacco control) is needed. By adopting these economically viable NNPs as part of the solution, NNPs can be smoking control's valued ally. Synthesis of the science indicates that policy and regulation can sufficiently protect youth while speeding the switch away from smoking. Despite some risks of nicotine dependence that can be mitigated but not eliminated, no credible evidence counters the assertion that NNPs will save lives if they displace smoking. But scientific evidence and advocacy has selectively exaggerated NNP harms over benefits. Accurate communication is crucial to dispel the misperception of NNPs harms and reassure smokers they can successfully replace smoking cigarettes with NNPs. Saving more lives now is an attainable and pragmatic way to call for alignment of all stakeholders and factions within traditional tobacco control rather than perpetuate the unrealized and unrealizable perfection of nicotine prohibition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPreventive Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Harm Reduction
Nicotine
Smoke
Smoking
Tobacco
Tobacco Use Disorder
Poisons
Lasers
Communication

Keywords

  • Electronic nicotine delivery systems
  • Harm minimization
  • Harm reduction
  • Mortality
  • Nicotine
  • Non-combusted tobacco
  • Public health impact
  • Smoking
  • Tobacco

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Managing nicotine without smoke to save lives now : Evidence for harm minimization. / Abrams, David B.; Glasser, Allison M.; Villanti, Andrea C.; Pearson, Jennifer L.; Rose, Shyanika; Niaura, Raymond S.

In: Preventive Medicine, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abrams, David B. ; Glasser, Allison M. ; Villanti, Andrea C. ; Pearson, Jennifer L. ; Rose, Shyanika ; Niaura, Raymond S. / Managing nicotine without smoke to save lives now : Evidence for harm minimization. In: Preventive Medicine. 2018.
@article{55b47c2c057748618e230b7ef2b6595e,
title = "Managing nicotine without smoke to save lives now: Evidence for harm minimization",
abstract = "Tobacco control has made strides in prevention and cessation, but deaths will not decline rapidly without massive behavior change. Currently, inhaled smoke from combusting tobacco is chiefly responsible for prematurely killing 7.2 million people worldwide and 530,000 in the United States annually. An array of noncombustible nicotine products (NNPs) has emerged and has disrupted the marketplace. Saving lives more speedily will require societal acceptance of locating a “sweet spot” within a three-dimensional framework where NNPs are simultaneously: 1. Less toxic, 2. Appealing (can reach smokers at scale), and 3. Satisfying (adequate nicotine delivery) to displace smoking. For this harm minimization framework to eliminate smoking, a laser focus on “smoking control” (not general tobacco control) is needed. By adopting these economically viable NNPs as part of the solution, NNPs can be smoking control's valued ally. Synthesis of the science indicates that policy and regulation can sufficiently protect youth while speeding the switch away from smoking. Despite some risks of nicotine dependence that can be mitigated but not eliminated, no credible evidence counters the assertion that NNPs will save lives if they displace smoking. But scientific evidence and advocacy has selectively exaggerated NNP harms over benefits. Accurate communication is crucial to dispel the misperception of NNPs harms and reassure smokers they can successfully replace smoking cigarettes with NNPs. Saving more lives now is an attainable and pragmatic way to call for alignment of all stakeholders and factions within traditional tobacco control rather than perpetuate the unrealized and unrealizable perfection of nicotine prohibition.",
keywords = "Electronic nicotine delivery systems, Harm minimization, Harm reduction, Mortality, Nicotine, Non-combusted tobacco, Public health impact, Smoking, Tobacco",
author = "Abrams, {David B.} and Glasser, {Allison M.} and Villanti, {Andrea C.} and Pearson, {Jennifer L.} and Shyanika Rose and Niaura, {Raymond S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.06.010",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing nicotine without smoke to save lives now

T2 - Evidence for harm minimization

AU - Abrams, David B.

AU - Glasser, Allison M.

AU - Villanti, Andrea C.

AU - Pearson, Jennifer L.

AU - Rose, Shyanika

AU - Niaura, Raymond S.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Tobacco control has made strides in prevention and cessation, but deaths will not decline rapidly without massive behavior change. Currently, inhaled smoke from combusting tobacco is chiefly responsible for prematurely killing 7.2 million people worldwide and 530,000 in the United States annually. An array of noncombustible nicotine products (NNPs) has emerged and has disrupted the marketplace. Saving lives more speedily will require societal acceptance of locating a “sweet spot” within a three-dimensional framework where NNPs are simultaneously: 1. Less toxic, 2. Appealing (can reach smokers at scale), and 3. Satisfying (adequate nicotine delivery) to displace smoking. For this harm minimization framework to eliminate smoking, a laser focus on “smoking control” (not general tobacco control) is needed. By adopting these economically viable NNPs as part of the solution, NNPs can be smoking control's valued ally. Synthesis of the science indicates that policy and regulation can sufficiently protect youth while speeding the switch away from smoking. Despite some risks of nicotine dependence that can be mitigated but not eliminated, no credible evidence counters the assertion that NNPs will save lives if they displace smoking. But scientific evidence and advocacy has selectively exaggerated NNP harms over benefits. Accurate communication is crucial to dispel the misperception of NNPs harms and reassure smokers they can successfully replace smoking cigarettes with NNPs. Saving more lives now is an attainable and pragmatic way to call for alignment of all stakeholders and factions within traditional tobacco control rather than perpetuate the unrealized and unrealizable perfection of nicotine prohibition.

AB - Tobacco control has made strides in prevention and cessation, but deaths will not decline rapidly without massive behavior change. Currently, inhaled smoke from combusting tobacco is chiefly responsible for prematurely killing 7.2 million people worldwide and 530,000 in the United States annually. An array of noncombustible nicotine products (NNPs) has emerged and has disrupted the marketplace. Saving lives more speedily will require societal acceptance of locating a “sweet spot” within a three-dimensional framework where NNPs are simultaneously: 1. Less toxic, 2. Appealing (can reach smokers at scale), and 3. Satisfying (adequate nicotine delivery) to displace smoking. For this harm minimization framework to eliminate smoking, a laser focus on “smoking control” (not general tobacco control) is needed. By adopting these economically viable NNPs as part of the solution, NNPs can be smoking control's valued ally. Synthesis of the science indicates that policy and regulation can sufficiently protect youth while speeding the switch away from smoking. Despite some risks of nicotine dependence that can be mitigated but not eliminated, no credible evidence counters the assertion that NNPs will save lives if they displace smoking. But scientific evidence and advocacy has selectively exaggerated NNP harms over benefits. Accurate communication is crucial to dispel the misperception of NNPs harms and reassure smokers they can successfully replace smoking cigarettes with NNPs. Saving more lives now is an attainable and pragmatic way to call for alignment of all stakeholders and factions within traditional tobacco control rather than perpetuate the unrealized and unrealizable perfection of nicotine prohibition.

KW - Electronic nicotine delivery systems

KW - Harm minimization

KW - Harm reduction

KW - Mortality

KW - Nicotine

KW - Non-combusted tobacco

KW - Public health impact

KW - Smoking

KW - Tobacco

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049998497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049998497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.06.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.06.010

M3 - Article

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

ER -