Managing conflicts of interest in clinical care: A national survey of policies at U.S. medical schools

Susan Chimonas, Lisa Patterson, Victoria Raveis, David J. Rothman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Policy recommendations specify how academic medical centers should manage clinical conflicts of interest (CCOIs), including gifts and payments to physicians from pharmaceutical companies. However, no reliable data exist on the extent to which schools have policies to manage CCOIs. The authors sought to determine the extent and strength of medical schools' CCOI policies. Method: A survey asked compliance officers at 125 MD-granting medical schools in the United States to indicate whether their institutions had policies covering 11 areas of CCOI and to provide copies of relevant policies. Policies were scored as 0 (no policy), 1 (permissive), 2 (moderate), or 3 (stringent), based on published recommendations. Each school's scores were averaged to create a measure of overall policy strength. The authors also collected information on schools'public/private status, hospital ownership/affiliation, and NIH funding to determine whether these characteristics were associated with differences in policy strength. Results: A representative sample of 77 of 125 (62%) medical schools responded between October 2007 and December 2008. Absence of policy was the most frequent finding in 7 of 11 CCOI areas. The mean score for overall policy strength was 1.2. Greater NIH funding was associated with stronger policies in 9 areas. Conclusions: This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of medical schools' CCOI policies. Wider adoption of CCOI policies is crucial to eliminate undue industry influence in clinical care and to preserve public trust in the medical profession. The authors close with a consideration of why so few medical schools have implemented strong policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-299
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume86
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

conflict of interest
school
funding
school policy
gift
pharmaceutical
profession
physician
industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Managing conflicts of interest in clinical care : A national survey of policies at U.S. medical schools. / Chimonas, Susan; Patterson, Lisa; Raveis, Victoria; Rothman, David J.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 86, No. 3, 01.01.2011, p. 293-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chimonas, Susan ; Patterson, Lisa ; Raveis, Victoria ; Rothman, David J. / Managing conflicts of interest in clinical care : A national survey of policies at U.S. medical schools. In: Academic Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 86, No. 3. pp. 293-299.
@article{60558e32de18404b81a08d575c96d2a0,
title = "Managing conflicts of interest in clinical care: A national survey of policies at U.S. medical schools",
abstract = "Purpose: Policy recommendations specify how academic medical centers should manage clinical conflicts of interest (CCOIs), including gifts and payments to physicians from pharmaceutical companies. However, no reliable data exist on the extent to which schools have policies to manage CCOIs. The authors sought to determine the extent and strength of medical schools' CCOI policies. Method: A survey asked compliance officers at 125 MD-granting medical schools in the United States to indicate whether their institutions had policies covering 11 areas of CCOI and to provide copies of relevant policies. Policies were scored as 0 (no policy), 1 (permissive), 2 (moderate), or 3 (stringent), based on published recommendations. Each school's scores were averaged to create a measure of overall policy strength. The authors also collected information on schools'public/private status, hospital ownership/affiliation, and NIH funding to determine whether these characteristics were associated with differences in policy strength. Results: A representative sample of 77 of 125 (62{\%}) medical schools responded between October 2007 and December 2008. Absence of policy was the most frequent finding in 7 of 11 CCOI areas. The mean score for overall policy strength was 1.2. Greater NIH funding was associated with stronger policies in 9 areas. Conclusions: This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of medical schools' CCOI policies. Wider adoption of CCOI policies is crucial to eliminate undue industry influence in clinical care and to preserve public trust in the medical profession. The authors close with a consideration of why so few medical schools have implemented strong policies.",
author = "Susan Chimonas and Lisa Patterson and Victoria Raveis and Rothman, {David J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182087156",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "293--299",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing conflicts of interest in clinical care

T2 - A national survey of policies at U.S. medical schools

AU - Chimonas, Susan

AU - Patterson, Lisa

AU - Raveis, Victoria

AU - Rothman, David J.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Policy recommendations specify how academic medical centers should manage clinical conflicts of interest (CCOIs), including gifts and payments to physicians from pharmaceutical companies. However, no reliable data exist on the extent to which schools have policies to manage CCOIs. The authors sought to determine the extent and strength of medical schools' CCOI policies. Method: A survey asked compliance officers at 125 MD-granting medical schools in the United States to indicate whether their institutions had policies covering 11 areas of CCOI and to provide copies of relevant policies. Policies were scored as 0 (no policy), 1 (permissive), 2 (moderate), or 3 (stringent), based on published recommendations. Each school's scores were averaged to create a measure of overall policy strength. The authors also collected information on schools'public/private status, hospital ownership/affiliation, and NIH funding to determine whether these characteristics were associated with differences in policy strength. Results: A representative sample of 77 of 125 (62%) medical schools responded between October 2007 and December 2008. Absence of policy was the most frequent finding in 7 of 11 CCOI areas. The mean score for overall policy strength was 1.2. Greater NIH funding was associated with stronger policies in 9 areas. Conclusions: This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of medical schools' CCOI policies. Wider adoption of CCOI policies is crucial to eliminate undue industry influence in clinical care and to preserve public trust in the medical profession. The authors close with a consideration of why so few medical schools have implemented strong policies.

AB - Purpose: Policy recommendations specify how academic medical centers should manage clinical conflicts of interest (CCOIs), including gifts and payments to physicians from pharmaceutical companies. However, no reliable data exist on the extent to which schools have policies to manage CCOIs. The authors sought to determine the extent and strength of medical schools' CCOI policies. Method: A survey asked compliance officers at 125 MD-granting medical schools in the United States to indicate whether their institutions had policies covering 11 areas of CCOI and to provide copies of relevant policies. Policies were scored as 0 (no policy), 1 (permissive), 2 (moderate), or 3 (stringent), based on published recommendations. Each school's scores were averaged to create a measure of overall policy strength. The authors also collected information on schools'public/private status, hospital ownership/affiliation, and NIH funding to determine whether these characteristics were associated with differences in policy strength. Results: A representative sample of 77 of 125 (62%) medical schools responded between October 2007 and December 2008. Absence of policy was the most frequent finding in 7 of 11 CCOI areas. The mean score for overall policy strength was 1.2. Greater NIH funding was associated with stronger policies in 9 areas. Conclusions: This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of medical schools' CCOI policies. Wider adoption of CCOI policies is crucial to eliminate undue industry influence in clinical care and to preserve public trust in the medical profession. The authors close with a consideration of why so few medical schools have implemented strong policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952186400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952186400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182087156

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182087156

M3 - Article

C2 - 21248603

AN - SCOPUS:79952186400

VL - 86

SP - 293

EP - 299

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 3

ER -