Making the rules of sports fairer

Steven Brams, Mehmet S. Ismail

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The rules of many sports are not fair-they do not ensure that equally skilled competitors have the same probability of winning. As an example, the penalty shootout in soccer, wherein a coin toss determines which team kicks first on all five penalty kicks, gives a substantial advantage to the first-kicking team, both in theory and in practice. We show that a so-called Catch-Up Rule for determining the order of kicking would not only make the shootout fairer but is also essentially strategyproof. By contrast, the so-called Standard Rule now used for the tiebreaker in tennis is fair. We briefly consider several other sports, all of which involve scoring a sufficient number of points to win, and show how they could benefit from certain rule changes which would be straightforward to implement.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)181-202
    Number of pages22
    JournalSIAM Review
    Volume60
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

    Fingerprint

    Sports
    Penalty
    Scoring
    Sufficient

    Keywords

    • Fairness
    • Markov process
    • Soccer
    • Sports rules
    • Strategyproofness
    • Tennis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Theoretical Computer Science
    • Computational Mathematics
    • Applied Mathematics

    Cite this

    Brams, S., & Ismail, M. S. (2018). Making the rules of sports fairer. SIAM Review, 60(1), 181-202. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1074540

    Making the rules of sports fairer. / Brams, Steven; Ismail, Mehmet S.

    In: SIAM Review, Vol. 60, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 181-202.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Brams, S & Ismail, MS 2018, 'Making the rules of sports fairer', SIAM Review, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 181-202. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1074540
    Brams, Steven ; Ismail, Mehmet S. / Making the rules of sports fairer. In: SIAM Review. 2018 ; Vol. 60, No. 1. pp. 181-202.
    @article{13872add6e554457a284346c350c923f,
    title = "Making the rules of sports fairer",
    abstract = "The rules of many sports are not fair-they do not ensure that equally skilled competitors have the same probability of winning. As an example, the penalty shootout in soccer, wherein a coin toss determines which team kicks first on all five penalty kicks, gives a substantial advantage to the first-kicking team, both in theory and in practice. We show that a so-called Catch-Up Rule for determining the order of kicking would not only make the shootout fairer but is also essentially strategyproof. By contrast, the so-called Standard Rule now used for the tiebreaker in tennis is fair. We briefly consider several other sports, all of which involve scoring a sufficient number of points to win, and show how they could benefit from certain rule changes which would be straightforward to implement.",
    keywords = "Fairness, Markov process, Soccer, Sports rules, Strategyproofness, Tennis",
    author = "Steven Brams and Ismail, {Mehmet S.}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1137/16M1074540",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "60",
    pages = "181--202",
    journal = "SIAM Review",
    issn = "0036-1445",
    publisher = "Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Publications",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Making the rules of sports fairer

    AU - Brams, Steven

    AU - Ismail, Mehmet S.

    PY - 2018/1/1

    Y1 - 2018/1/1

    N2 - The rules of many sports are not fair-they do not ensure that equally skilled competitors have the same probability of winning. As an example, the penalty shootout in soccer, wherein a coin toss determines which team kicks first on all five penalty kicks, gives a substantial advantage to the first-kicking team, both in theory and in practice. We show that a so-called Catch-Up Rule for determining the order of kicking would not only make the shootout fairer but is also essentially strategyproof. By contrast, the so-called Standard Rule now used for the tiebreaker in tennis is fair. We briefly consider several other sports, all of which involve scoring a sufficient number of points to win, and show how they could benefit from certain rule changes which would be straightforward to implement.

    AB - The rules of many sports are not fair-they do not ensure that equally skilled competitors have the same probability of winning. As an example, the penalty shootout in soccer, wherein a coin toss determines which team kicks first on all five penalty kicks, gives a substantial advantage to the first-kicking team, both in theory and in practice. We show that a so-called Catch-Up Rule for determining the order of kicking would not only make the shootout fairer but is also essentially strategyproof. By contrast, the so-called Standard Rule now used for the tiebreaker in tennis is fair. We briefly consider several other sports, all of which involve scoring a sufficient number of points to win, and show how they could benefit from certain rule changes which would be straightforward to implement.

    KW - Fairness

    KW - Markov process

    KW - Soccer

    KW - Sports rules

    KW - Strategyproofness

    KW - Tennis

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043706778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043706778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1137/16M1074540

    DO - 10.1137/16M1074540

    M3 - Article

    VL - 60

    SP - 181

    EP - 202

    JO - SIAM Review

    JF - SIAM Review

    SN - 0036-1445

    IS - 1

    ER -