Making sense of relational processes and other psychological Phenomena: The participatory perspective as a post-cartesian alternative to gergen's relational approach

Michael Westerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Gergen's (2009, 2011a, 2011b) relational approach and the participatory perspective (Westerman, 2005, 2006, 2014; Westerman & Steen, 2007) both subscribe to the view that we need to depart from treating the individual as the bounded, separate agent of the Cartesian framework. However, whereas Gergen's position moves away from individualistic accounts by holding that all psychological processes originate in relational processes in the dyad, the participatory perspective accomplishes this shift by viewing the person from the outset as a participant in the world of practical activities. In this article, I discuss implications that follow from this difference in starting points, including a number of ways in which the participatory perspective avoids problematic features of Gergen's approach. I argue that the participatory perspective offers a more sound framework for studying psychological phenomena, including interpersonal, or relational, processes themselves, the founding term of Gergen's relational approach. Regarding relational processes, it enables us to address questions about (a) continuity in interpersonal behavior across relationship contexts, and (b) how relational processes within a dyad change. I maintain that the limitations of Gergen's relational approach reflect the fact that it actually represents a variant of the Cartesian framework, even though Gergen's goal was to depart from that framework. In addition, I maintain that the participatory perspective provides a more adequate basis for work in the field because it successfully goes beyond Cartesianism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)358-373
Number of pages16
JournalReview of General Psychology
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Psychological Phenomena and Processes
Psychology

Keywords

  • Cartesian framework
  • Continuity of interpersonal behavior across contexts
  • Gergen's relational approach
  • Participatory perspective
  • Relational processes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{61367320ae154270b513b469f6050e7c,
title = "Making sense of relational processes and other psychological Phenomena: The participatory perspective as a post-cartesian alternative to gergen's relational approach",
abstract = "Gergen's (2009, 2011a, 2011b) relational approach and the participatory perspective (Westerman, 2005, 2006, 2014; Westerman & Steen, 2007) both subscribe to the view that we need to depart from treating the individual as the bounded, separate agent of the Cartesian framework. However, whereas Gergen's position moves away from individualistic accounts by holding that all psychological processes originate in relational processes in the dyad, the participatory perspective accomplishes this shift by viewing the person from the outset as a participant in the world of practical activities. In this article, I discuss implications that follow from this difference in starting points, including a number of ways in which the participatory perspective avoids problematic features of Gergen's approach. I argue that the participatory perspective offers a more sound framework for studying psychological phenomena, including interpersonal, or relational, processes themselves, the founding term of Gergen's relational approach. Regarding relational processes, it enables us to address questions about (a) continuity in interpersonal behavior across relationship contexts, and (b) how relational processes within a dyad change. I maintain that the limitations of Gergen's relational approach reflect the fact that it actually represents a variant of the Cartesian framework, even though Gergen's goal was to depart from that framework. In addition, I maintain that the participatory perspective provides a more adequate basis for work in the field because it successfully goes beyond Cartesianism.",
keywords = "Cartesian framework, Continuity of interpersonal behavior across contexts, Gergen's relational approach, Participatory perspective, Relational processes",
author = "Michael Westerman",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/a0034447",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "358--373",
journal = "Review of General Psychology",
issn = "1089-2680",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making sense of relational processes and other psychological Phenomena

T2 - The participatory perspective as a post-cartesian alternative to gergen's relational approach

AU - Westerman, Michael

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Gergen's (2009, 2011a, 2011b) relational approach and the participatory perspective (Westerman, 2005, 2006, 2014; Westerman & Steen, 2007) both subscribe to the view that we need to depart from treating the individual as the bounded, separate agent of the Cartesian framework. However, whereas Gergen's position moves away from individualistic accounts by holding that all psychological processes originate in relational processes in the dyad, the participatory perspective accomplishes this shift by viewing the person from the outset as a participant in the world of practical activities. In this article, I discuss implications that follow from this difference in starting points, including a number of ways in which the participatory perspective avoids problematic features of Gergen's approach. I argue that the participatory perspective offers a more sound framework for studying psychological phenomena, including interpersonal, or relational, processes themselves, the founding term of Gergen's relational approach. Regarding relational processes, it enables us to address questions about (a) continuity in interpersonal behavior across relationship contexts, and (b) how relational processes within a dyad change. I maintain that the limitations of Gergen's relational approach reflect the fact that it actually represents a variant of the Cartesian framework, even though Gergen's goal was to depart from that framework. In addition, I maintain that the participatory perspective provides a more adequate basis for work in the field because it successfully goes beyond Cartesianism.

AB - Gergen's (2009, 2011a, 2011b) relational approach and the participatory perspective (Westerman, 2005, 2006, 2014; Westerman & Steen, 2007) both subscribe to the view that we need to depart from treating the individual as the bounded, separate agent of the Cartesian framework. However, whereas Gergen's position moves away from individualistic accounts by holding that all psychological processes originate in relational processes in the dyad, the participatory perspective accomplishes this shift by viewing the person from the outset as a participant in the world of practical activities. In this article, I discuss implications that follow from this difference in starting points, including a number of ways in which the participatory perspective avoids problematic features of Gergen's approach. I argue that the participatory perspective offers a more sound framework for studying psychological phenomena, including interpersonal, or relational, processes themselves, the founding term of Gergen's relational approach. Regarding relational processes, it enables us to address questions about (a) continuity in interpersonal behavior across relationship contexts, and (b) how relational processes within a dyad change. I maintain that the limitations of Gergen's relational approach reflect the fact that it actually represents a variant of the Cartesian framework, even though Gergen's goal was to depart from that framework. In addition, I maintain that the participatory perspective provides a more adequate basis for work in the field because it successfully goes beyond Cartesianism.

KW - Cartesian framework

KW - Continuity of interpersonal behavior across contexts

KW - Gergen's relational approach

KW - Participatory perspective

KW - Relational processes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891430196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891430196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0034447

DO - 10.1037/a0034447

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84891430196

VL - 17

SP - 358

EP - 373

JO - Review of General Psychology

JF - Review of General Psychology

SN - 1089-2680

IS - 4

ER -