Making Interpersonal Meaning

Significant Others in Mind in Transference

Elizabeth Przybylinski, Susan Andersen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The social cognitive process of transference may serve as a means of constructing interpersonal meaning. Support for this proposition is presented through a review of evidence on the relational self in transference, reframed in terms of meaning construction, as well as new investigations of the ways precise ways in which transference can serve this function. In the underlying theory, knowledge one has about each of the various significant others in one's life is represented in memory and linked to a distinct relational self in memory by means of the relationship with that other. Significant-other knowledge can be activated in an interpersonal encounter and, when transference occurs, used to go beyond the information given about a new person and also influences affect, motivation, and self-regulation (Andersen & Glassman, 1996). Distinct relational selves also arise in transference depending on which significant other is triggered by the situation. These processes allow the individual to imbue the interpersonal encounter with personalized meaning. Further, recent evidence suggests that whole meaning systems shared with the significant other are constructed in that relationship and are thus evoked and pursued in the transference encounter.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)746-759
Number of pages14
JournalSocial and Personality Psychology Compass
Volume6
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Ego
Transference (Psychology)
Motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Making Interpersonal Meaning : Significant Others in Mind in Transference. / Przybylinski, Elizabeth; Andersen, Susan.

In: Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol. 6, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 746-759.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Przybylinski, Elizabeth ; Andersen, Susan. / Making Interpersonal Meaning : Significant Others in Mind in Transference. In: Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2012 ; Vol. 6, No. 10. pp. 746-759.
@article{f2e299aad16a459699a2ff97f692fe84,
title = "Making Interpersonal Meaning: Significant Others in Mind in Transference",
abstract = "The social cognitive process of transference may serve as a means of constructing interpersonal meaning. Support for this proposition is presented through a review of evidence on the relational self in transference, reframed in terms of meaning construction, as well as new investigations of the ways precise ways in which transference can serve this function. In the underlying theory, knowledge one has about each of the various significant others in one's life is represented in memory and linked to a distinct relational self in memory by means of the relationship with that other. Significant-other knowledge can be activated in an interpersonal encounter and, when transference occurs, used to go beyond the information given about a new person and also influences affect, motivation, and self-regulation (Andersen & Glassman, 1996). Distinct relational selves also arise in transference depending on which significant other is triggered by the situation. These processes allow the individual to imbue the interpersonal encounter with personalized meaning. Further, recent evidence suggests that whole meaning systems shared with the significant other are constructed in that relationship and are thus evoked and pursued in the transference encounter.",
author = "Elizabeth Przybylinski and Susan Andersen",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00460.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "746--759",
journal = "Social and Personality Psychology Compass",
issn = "1751-9004",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making Interpersonal Meaning

T2 - Significant Others in Mind in Transference

AU - Przybylinski, Elizabeth

AU - Andersen, Susan

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - The social cognitive process of transference may serve as a means of constructing interpersonal meaning. Support for this proposition is presented through a review of evidence on the relational self in transference, reframed in terms of meaning construction, as well as new investigations of the ways precise ways in which transference can serve this function. In the underlying theory, knowledge one has about each of the various significant others in one's life is represented in memory and linked to a distinct relational self in memory by means of the relationship with that other. Significant-other knowledge can be activated in an interpersonal encounter and, when transference occurs, used to go beyond the information given about a new person and also influences affect, motivation, and self-regulation (Andersen & Glassman, 1996). Distinct relational selves also arise in transference depending on which significant other is triggered by the situation. These processes allow the individual to imbue the interpersonal encounter with personalized meaning. Further, recent evidence suggests that whole meaning systems shared with the significant other are constructed in that relationship and are thus evoked and pursued in the transference encounter.

AB - The social cognitive process of transference may serve as a means of constructing interpersonal meaning. Support for this proposition is presented through a review of evidence on the relational self in transference, reframed in terms of meaning construction, as well as new investigations of the ways precise ways in which transference can serve this function. In the underlying theory, knowledge one has about each of the various significant others in one's life is represented in memory and linked to a distinct relational self in memory by means of the relationship with that other. Significant-other knowledge can be activated in an interpersonal encounter and, when transference occurs, used to go beyond the information given about a new person and also influences affect, motivation, and self-regulation (Andersen & Glassman, 1996). Distinct relational selves also arise in transference depending on which significant other is triggered by the situation. These processes allow the individual to imbue the interpersonal encounter with personalized meaning. Further, recent evidence suggests that whole meaning systems shared with the significant other are constructed in that relationship and are thus evoked and pursued in the transference encounter.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867132453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867132453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00460.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00460.x

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 746

EP - 759

JO - Social and Personality Psychology Compass

JF - Social and Personality Psychology Compass

SN - 1751-9004

IS - 10

ER -