Making Boundaries Great Again: Essentialism and Support for Boundary-Enhancing Initiatives

Steven O. Roberts, Arnold K. Ho, Marjorie Rhodes, Susan A. Gelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Psychological essentialism entails a focus on category boundaries (e.g., categorizing people as men or women) and an increase in the conceptual distance between those boundaries (e.g., accentuating the differences between men and women). Across eight studies, we demonstrate that essentialism additionally entails an increase in support for boundary-enhancing legislation, policies, and social services, and that it does so under conditions that disadvantage social groups, as well as conditions that benefit them. First, individual differences in essentialism were associated with support for legislation mandating that transgender people use restrooms corresponding with their biological sex, and with support for the boundary-enhancing policies of the 2016 then-presumptive Republican presidential nominee (i.e., Donald Trump). Second, essentialism was associated with support for same-gender classrooms designed to promote student learning, as well as support for services designed to benefit LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) individuals. These findings demonstrate the boundary-enhancing implications of essentialism and their social significance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1643-1658
Number of pages16
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume43
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Transgender Persons
Legislation
Social Conditions
Social Work
Individuality
Learning
Students
Psychology
Sexual Minorities
bispyribac

Keywords

  • boundary enhancement
  • Donald Trump
  • essentialism
  • social categories
  • transgender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Making Boundaries Great Again : Essentialism and Support for Boundary-Enhancing Initiatives. / Roberts, Steven O.; Ho, Arnold K.; Rhodes, Marjorie; Gelman, Susan A.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 43, No. 12, 01.12.2017, p. 1643-1658.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roberts, Steven O. ; Ho, Arnold K. ; Rhodes, Marjorie ; Gelman, Susan A. / Making Boundaries Great Again : Essentialism and Support for Boundary-Enhancing Initiatives. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2017 ; Vol. 43, No. 12. pp. 1643-1658.
@article{b01974e1081846c0b7189268df7c830b,
title = "Making Boundaries Great Again: Essentialism and Support for Boundary-Enhancing Initiatives",
abstract = "Psychological essentialism entails a focus on category boundaries (e.g., categorizing people as men or women) and an increase in the conceptual distance between those boundaries (e.g., accentuating the differences between men and women). Across eight studies, we demonstrate that essentialism additionally entails an increase in support for boundary-enhancing legislation, policies, and social services, and that it does so under conditions that disadvantage social groups, as well as conditions that benefit them. First, individual differences in essentialism were associated with support for legislation mandating that transgender people use restrooms corresponding with their biological sex, and with support for the boundary-enhancing policies of the 2016 then-presumptive Republican presidential nominee (i.e., Donald Trump). Second, essentialism was associated with support for same-gender classrooms designed to promote student learning, as well as support for services designed to benefit LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) individuals. These findings demonstrate the boundary-enhancing implications of essentialism and their social significance.",
keywords = "boundary enhancement, Donald Trump, essentialism, social categories, transgender",
author = "Roberts, {Steven O.} and Ho, {Arnold K.} and Marjorie Rhodes and Gelman, {Susan A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167217724801",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1643--1658",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making Boundaries Great Again

T2 - Essentialism and Support for Boundary-Enhancing Initiatives

AU - Roberts, Steven O.

AU - Ho, Arnold K.

AU - Rhodes, Marjorie

AU - Gelman, Susan A.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Psychological essentialism entails a focus on category boundaries (e.g., categorizing people as men or women) and an increase in the conceptual distance between those boundaries (e.g., accentuating the differences between men and women). Across eight studies, we demonstrate that essentialism additionally entails an increase in support for boundary-enhancing legislation, policies, and social services, and that it does so under conditions that disadvantage social groups, as well as conditions that benefit them. First, individual differences in essentialism were associated with support for legislation mandating that transgender people use restrooms corresponding with their biological sex, and with support for the boundary-enhancing policies of the 2016 then-presumptive Republican presidential nominee (i.e., Donald Trump). Second, essentialism was associated with support for same-gender classrooms designed to promote student learning, as well as support for services designed to benefit LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) individuals. These findings demonstrate the boundary-enhancing implications of essentialism and their social significance.

AB - Psychological essentialism entails a focus on category boundaries (e.g., categorizing people as men or women) and an increase in the conceptual distance between those boundaries (e.g., accentuating the differences between men and women). Across eight studies, we demonstrate that essentialism additionally entails an increase in support for boundary-enhancing legislation, policies, and social services, and that it does so under conditions that disadvantage social groups, as well as conditions that benefit them. First, individual differences in essentialism were associated with support for legislation mandating that transgender people use restrooms corresponding with their biological sex, and with support for the boundary-enhancing policies of the 2016 then-presumptive Republican presidential nominee (i.e., Donald Trump). Second, essentialism was associated with support for same-gender classrooms designed to promote student learning, as well as support for services designed to benefit LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) individuals. These findings demonstrate the boundary-enhancing implications of essentialism and their social significance.

KW - boundary enhancement

KW - Donald Trump

KW - essentialism

KW - social categories

KW - transgender

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032696778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032696778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167217724801

DO - 10.1177/0146167217724801

M3 - Article

C2 - 28914160

AN - SCOPUS:85032696778

VL - 43

SP - 1643

EP - 1658

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 12

ER -