Lost in the categorical shuffle: Evidence for the social non-prototypicality of Black women

Erin L. Thomas, John F. Dovidio, Tessa West

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The white male norm hypothesis (Zárate & Smith, 1990) posits that White men's race and gender go overlooked as a result of their prototypical social statuses. In contrast, the intersectional invisibility hypothesis (Purdie-Vaughns & Eibach, 2008) posits that people with membership in multiple subordinate social groups experience social invisibility as a result of their non-prototypical social statuses. The present research reconciles these contradictory theories and provides empirical support for the core assumption of the intersectional invisibility hypothesis-that intersectional targets are non-prototypical within their race and gender ingroups. In a speeded categorization task, participants were slower to associate Black women versus Black men with the category "Black" and slower to associate Black women versus White women with the category "woman." We discuss the implications of this work for social categorical theory development and future intersectionality research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-376
Number of pages7
JournalCultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

evidence
social status
intersectionality
development theory
gender
Research
experience
Social Theory

Keywords

  • Black women
  • Categorization
  • Intersectionality
  • Social prototypicality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Lost in the categorical shuffle : Evidence for the social non-prototypicality of Black women. / Thomas, Erin L.; Dovidio, John F.; West, Tessa.

In: Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2014, p. 370-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc2e4d6a4eb34b09a3871193141de823,
title = "Lost in the categorical shuffle: Evidence for the social non-prototypicality of Black women",
abstract = "The white male norm hypothesis (Z{\'a}rate & Smith, 1990) posits that White men's race and gender go overlooked as a result of their prototypical social statuses. In contrast, the intersectional invisibility hypothesis (Purdie-Vaughns & Eibach, 2008) posits that people with membership in multiple subordinate social groups experience social invisibility as a result of their non-prototypical social statuses. The present research reconciles these contradictory theories and provides empirical support for the core assumption of the intersectional invisibility hypothesis-that intersectional targets are non-prototypical within their race and gender ingroups. In a speeded categorization task, participants were slower to associate Black women versus Black men with the category {"}Black{"} and slower to associate Black women versus White women with the category {"}woman.{"} We discuss the implications of this work for social categorical theory development and future intersectionality research.",
keywords = "Black women, Categorization, Intersectionality, Social prototypicality",
author = "Thomas, {Erin L.} and Dovidio, {John F.} and Tessa West",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1037/a0035096",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "370--376",
journal = "Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology",
issn = "1099-9809",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lost in the categorical shuffle

T2 - Evidence for the social non-prototypicality of Black women

AU - Thomas, Erin L.

AU - Dovidio, John F.

AU - West, Tessa

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The white male norm hypothesis (Zárate & Smith, 1990) posits that White men's race and gender go overlooked as a result of their prototypical social statuses. In contrast, the intersectional invisibility hypothesis (Purdie-Vaughns & Eibach, 2008) posits that people with membership in multiple subordinate social groups experience social invisibility as a result of their non-prototypical social statuses. The present research reconciles these contradictory theories and provides empirical support for the core assumption of the intersectional invisibility hypothesis-that intersectional targets are non-prototypical within their race and gender ingroups. In a speeded categorization task, participants were slower to associate Black women versus Black men with the category "Black" and slower to associate Black women versus White women with the category "woman." We discuss the implications of this work for social categorical theory development and future intersectionality research.

AB - The white male norm hypothesis (Zárate & Smith, 1990) posits that White men's race and gender go overlooked as a result of their prototypical social statuses. In contrast, the intersectional invisibility hypothesis (Purdie-Vaughns & Eibach, 2008) posits that people with membership in multiple subordinate social groups experience social invisibility as a result of their non-prototypical social statuses. The present research reconciles these contradictory theories and provides empirical support for the core assumption of the intersectional invisibility hypothesis-that intersectional targets are non-prototypical within their race and gender ingroups. In a speeded categorization task, participants were slower to associate Black women versus Black men with the category "Black" and slower to associate Black women versus White women with the category "woman." We discuss the implications of this work for social categorical theory development and future intersectionality research.

KW - Black women

KW - Categorization

KW - Intersectionality

KW - Social prototypicality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904726127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904726127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0035096

DO - 10.1037/a0035096

M3 - Article

C2 - 24730367

AN - SCOPUS:84904726127

VL - 20

SP - 370

EP - 376

JO - Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology

JF - Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology

SN - 1099-9809

IS - 3

ER -