Life-cycle cost analysis: State of the practice versus state of the art

Kaan Ozbay, Dima Jawad, Neville A. Parker, Sajjad Hussain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is increasingly gaining recognition by the transportation community as an indispensable practice if the sustainability of its infrastructure systems is to be realized. The product of a 3-year study that assessed the LCCA practice in state highway agencies (SHAs) is presented. The study examined how LCCA practice changed in two decades, surveyed the way LCCA is practiced currently at SHAs in the United States, and reviewed how this evaluation technique is deliberated by the academics and researchers in the engineering and economics domains. Results of this study prove noteworthy in the inspection of an observed gap between the state of the practice and state of the art of LCCA. After all, that gap set up grounds for the noted mistrust in the credibility of LCCA. In addition to study results, an analysis of the observed gap and its causes is presented as well as recommendations for what can be done to bridge that gap. It is hoped that this will prove valuable for practitioners conducting LCCA, for policy makers, and for researchers carrying out studies on various topics related to LCCA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-70
Number of pages9
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number1864
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Life cycle
Costs
Sustainable development
Inspection
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Ozbay, K., Jawad, D., Parker, N. A., & Hussain, S. (2004). Life-cycle cost analysis: State of the practice versus state of the art. Transportation Research Record, (1864), 62-70.

Life-cycle cost analysis : State of the practice versus state of the art. / Ozbay, Kaan; Jawad, Dima; Parker, Neville A.; Hussain, Sajjad.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 1864, 2004, p. 62-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ozbay, K, Jawad, D, Parker, NA & Hussain, S 2004, 'Life-cycle cost analysis: State of the practice versus state of the art', Transportation Research Record, no. 1864, pp. 62-70.
Ozbay, Kaan ; Jawad, Dima ; Parker, Neville A. ; Hussain, Sajjad. / Life-cycle cost analysis : State of the practice versus state of the art. In: Transportation Research Record. 2004 ; No. 1864. pp. 62-70.
@article{6fea12dab9b342af8f5dd3393e54b368,
title = "Life-cycle cost analysis: State of the practice versus state of the art",
abstract = "Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is increasingly gaining recognition by the transportation community as an indispensable practice if the sustainability of its infrastructure systems is to be realized. The product of a 3-year study that assessed the LCCA practice in state highway agencies (SHAs) is presented. The study examined how LCCA practice changed in two decades, surveyed the way LCCA is practiced currently at SHAs in the United States, and reviewed how this evaluation technique is deliberated by the academics and researchers in the engineering and economics domains. Results of this study prove noteworthy in the inspection of an observed gap between the state of the practice and state of the art of LCCA. After all, that gap set up grounds for the noted mistrust in the credibility of LCCA. In addition to study results, an analysis of the observed gap and its causes is presented as well as recommendations for what can be done to bridge that gap. It is hoped that this will prove valuable for practitioners conducting LCCA, for policy makers, and for researchers carrying out studies on various topics related to LCCA.",
author = "Kaan Ozbay and Dima Jawad and Parker, {Neville A.} and Sajjad Hussain",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "62--70",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "1864",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life-cycle cost analysis

T2 - State of the practice versus state of the art

AU - Ozbay, Kaan

AU - Jawad, Dima

AU - Parker, Neville A.

AU - Hussain, Sajjad

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is increasingly gaining recognition by the transportation community as an indispensable practice if the sustainability of its infrastructure systems is to be realized. The product of a 3-year study that assessed the LCCA practice in state highway agencies (SHAs) is presented. The study examined how LCCA practice changed in two decades, surveyed the way LCCA is practiced currently at SHAs in the United States, and reviewed how this evaluation technique is deliberated by the academics and researchers in the engineering and economics domains. Results of this study prove noteworthy in the inspection of an observed gap between the state of the practice and state of the art of LCCA. After all, that gap set up grounds for the noted mistrust in the credibility of LCCA. In addition to study results, an analysis of the observed gap and its causes is presented as well as recommendations for what can be done to bridge that gap. It is hoped that this will prove valuable for practitioners conducting LCCA, for policy makers, and for researchers carrying out studies on various topics related to LCCA.

AB - Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is increasingly gaining recognition by the transportation community as an indispensable practice if the sustainability of its infrastructure systems is to be realized. The product of a 3-year study that assessed the LCCA practice in state highway agencies (SHAs) is presented. The study examined how LCCA practice changed in two decades, surveyed the way LCCA is practiced currently at SHAs in the United States, and reviewed how this evaluation technique is deliberated by the academics and researchers in the engineering and economics domains. Results of this study prove noteworthy in the inspection of an observed gap between the state of the practice and state of the art of LCCA. After all, that gap set up grounds for the noted mistrust in the credibility of LCCA. In addition to study results, an analysis of the observed gap and its causes is presented as well as recommendations for what can be done to bridge that gap. It is hoped that this will prove valuable for practitioners conducting LCCA, for policy makers, and for researchers carrying out studies on various topics related to LCCA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10044272266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10044272266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 62

EP - 70

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 1864

ER -