Large-scale bias and the inaccuracy of the peak-background split

M. Manera, Ravi K. Sheth, R. Scoccimarro

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The peak-background split argument is commonly used to relate the abundance of dark matter haloes to their spatial clustering. Testing this argument requires an accurate determination of the halo mass function. We present a maximum-likelihood method for fitting parametric functional forms to halo abundances which differs from previous work because it does not require binned counts. Our conclusions do not depend on whether we use our method or more conventional ones. In addition, halo abundances depend on how haloes are defined. Our conclusions do not depend on the choice of link length associated with the friends-of-friends halo finder, nor do they change if we identify haloes using a spherical overdensity algorithm instead. The large-scale halo bias measured from the matter-halo cross spectrum b× and the halo autocorrelation function bξ (on scales k∼ 0.03 h Mpc-1 and r∼ 50 h-1 Mpc) can differ by as much as 5 per cent for haloes that are significantly more massive than the characteristic mass M*. At these large masses, the peak-background split estimate of the linear bias factor b1 is 3-5 per cent smaller than bξ, which is 5 per cent smaller than b×. We discuss the origin of these discrepancies: deterministic non-linear local bias, with parameters determined by the peak-background split argument, is unable to account for the discrepancies we see. A simple linear but non-local bias model, motivated by peaks theory, may also be difficult to reconcile with our measurements. More work on such non-local bias models may be needed to understand the nature of halo bias at this level of precision.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)589-602
    Number of pages14
    JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
    Volume402
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 2010

    Fingerprint

    halos
    autocorrelation
    method
    dark matter
    parameter
    estimates

    Keywords

    • Dark matter
    • Galaxies: formation
    • Galaxies: haloes
    • Large-scale structure of Universe
    • Methods: analytical

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Space and Planetary Science
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics

    Cite this

    Large-scale bias and the inaccuracy of the peak-background split. / Manera, M.; Sheth, Ravi K.; Scoccimarro, R.

    In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 402, No. 1, 02.2010, p. 589-602.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Manera, M. ; Sheth, Ravi K. ; Scoccimarro, R. / Large-scale bias and the inaccuracy of the peak-background split. In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2010 ; Vol. 402, No. 1. pp. 589-602.
    @article{8180197b7ff8439095fd3594c1be4ac4,
    title = "Large-scale bias and the inaccuracy of the peak-background split",
    abstract = "The peak-background split argument is commonly used to relate the abundance of dark matter haloes to their spatial clustering. Testing this argument requires an accurate determination of the halo mass function. We present a maximum-likelihood method for fitting parametric functional forms to halo abundances which differs from previous work because it does not require binned counts. Our conclusions do not depend on whether we use our method or more conventional ones. In addition, halo abundances depend on how haloes are defined. Our conclusions do not depend on the choice of link length associated with the friends-of-friends halo finder, nor do they change if we identify haloes using a spherical overdensity algorithm instead. The large-scale halo bias measured from the matter-halo cross spectrum b× and the halo autocorrelation function bξ (on scales k∼ 0.03 h Mpc-1 and r∼ 50 h-1 Mpc) can differ by as much as 5 per cent for haloes that are significantly more massive than the characteristic mass M*. At these large masses, the peak-background split estimate of the linear bias factor b1 is 3-5 per cent smaller than bξ, which is 5 per cent smaller than b×. We discuss the origin of these discrepancies: deterministic non-linear local bias, with parameters determined by the peak-background split argument, is unable to account for the discrepancies we see. A simple linear but non-local bias model, motivated by peaks theory, may also be difficult to reconcile with our measurements. More work on such non-local bias models may be needed to understand the nature of halo bias at this level of precision.",
    keywords = "Dark matter, Galaxies: formation, Galaxies: haloes, Large-scale structure of Universe, Methods: analytical",
    author = "M. Manera and Sheth, {Ravi K.} and R. Scoccimarro",
    year = "2010",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15921.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "402",
    pages = "589--602",
    journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",
    issn = "0035-8711",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Large-scale bias and the inaccuracy of the peak-background split

    AU - Manera, M.

    AU - Sheth, Ravi K.

    AU - Scoccimarro, R.

    PY - 2010/2

    Y1 - 2010/2

    N2 - The peak-background split argument is commonly used to relate the abundance of dark matter haloes to their spatial clustering. Testing this argument requires an accurate determination of the halo mass function. We present a maximum-likelihood method for fitting parametric functional forms to halo abundances which differs from previous work because it does not require binned counts. Our conclusions do not depend on whether we use our method or more conventional ones. In addition, halo abundances depend on how haloes are defined. Our conclusions do not depend on the choice of link length associated with the friends-of-friends halo finder, nor do they change if we identify haloes using a spherical overdensity algorithm instead. The large-scale halo bias measured from the matter-halo cross spectrum b× and the halo autocorrelation function bξ (on scales k∼ 0.03 h Mpc-1 and r∼ 50 h-1 Mpc) can differ by as much as 5 per cent for haloes that are significantly more massive than the characteristic mass M*. At these large masses, the peak-background split estimate of the linear bias factor b1 is 3-5 per cent smaller than bξ, which is 5 per cent smaller than b×. We discuss the origin of these discrepancies: deterministic non-linear local bias, with parameters determined by the peak-background split argument, is unable to account for the discrepancies we see. A simple linear but non-local bias model, motivated by peaks theory, may also be difficult to reconcile with our measurements. More work on such non-local bias models may be needed to understand the nature of halo bias at this level of precision.

    AB - The peak-background split argument is commonly used to relate the abundance of dark matter haloes to their spatial clustering. Testing this argument requires an accurate determination of the halo mass function. We present a maximum-likelihood method for fitting parametric functional forms to halo abundances which differs from previous work because it does not require binned counts. Our conclusions do not depend on whether we use our method or more conventional ones. In addition, halo abundances depend on how haloes are defined. Our conclusions do not depend on the choice of link length associated with the friends-of-friends halo finder, nor do they change if we identify haloes using a spherical overdensity algorithm instead. The large-scale halo bias measured from the matter-halo cross spectrum b× and the halo autocorrelation function bξ (on scales k∼ 0.03 h Mpc-1 and r∼ 50 h-1 Mpc) can differ by as much as 5 per cent for haloes that are significantly more massive than the characteristic mass M*. At these large masses, the peak-background split estimate of the linear bias factor b1 is 3-5 per cent smaller than bξ, which is 5 per cent smaller than b×. We discuss the origin of these discrepancies: deterministic non-linear local bias, with parameters determined by the peak-background split argument, is unable to account for the discrepancies we see. A simple linear but non-local bias model, motivated by peaks theory, may also be difficult to reconcile with our measurements. More work on such non-local bias models may be needed to understand the nature of halo bias at this level of precision.

    KW - Dark matter

    KW - Galaxies: formation

    KW - Galaxies: haloes

    KW - Large-scale structure of Universe

    KW - Methods: analytical

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949338328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949338328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15921.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15921.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 402

    SP - 589

    EP - 602

    JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

    JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

    SN - 0035-8711

    IS - 1

    ER -