Language in context

MEG evidence for modality-general and -specific responses to reference resolution

Christian Brodbeck, Laura Gwilliams, Liina Pylkkanen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Successful language comprehension critically depends on our ability to link linguistic expressions to the entities they refer to. Without reference resolution, newly encountered language cannot be related to previously acquired knowledge. The human experience includes many different types of referents, some visual, some auditory, some very abstract. Does the neural basis of reference resolution depend on the nature of the referents, or do our brains use a modality-general mechanism for linking meanings to referents? Here we report evidence for both. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we varied both the modality of referents, which consisted either of visual or auditory objects, and the point at which reference resolution was possible within sentences. Source-localized MEG responses revealed brain activity associated with reference resolution that was independent of the modality of the referents, localized to the medial parietal lobe and starting ~415 ms after the onset of reference resolving words. A modality-specific response to reference resolution in auditory domains was also found, in the vicinity of auditory cortex. Our results suggest that referential language processing cannot be reduced to processing in classical language regions and representations of the referential domain in modality-specific neural systems. Instead, our results suggest that reference resolution engages medial parietal cortex, which supports a mechanism for referential processing regardless of the content modality.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article numbere0145
    JournaleNeuro
    Volume3
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 15 2016

    Fingerprint

    Magnetoencephalography
    Language
    Parietal Lobe
    Auditory Cortex
    Aptitude
    Brain
    Linguistics

    Keywords

    • Language comprehension
    • MEG
    • Reference
    • Situation model
    • Visual world

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine(all)

    Cite this

    Language in context : MEG evidence for modality-general and -specific responses to reference resolution. / Brodbeck, Christian; Gwilliams, Laura; Pylkkanen, Liina.

    In: eNeuro, Vol. 3, No. 6, e0145, 15.12.2016.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Brodbeck, Christian ; Gwilliams, Laura ; Pylkkanen, Liina. / Language in context : MEG evidence for modality-general and -specific responses to reference resolution. In: eNeuro. 2016 ; Vol. 3, No. 6.
    @article{bcba77592c4548b8838339c8bb74a256,
    title = "Language in context: MEG evidence for modality-general and -specific responses to reference resolution",
    abstract = "Successful language comprehension critically depends on our ability to link linguistic expressions to the entities they refer to. Without reference resolution, newly encountered language cannot be related to previously acquired knowledge. The human experience includes many different types of referents, some visual, some auditory, some very abstract. Does the neural basis of reference resolution depend on the nature of the referents, or do our brains use a modality-general mechanism for linking meanings to referents? Here we report evidence for both. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we varied both the modality of referents, which consisted either of visual or auditory objects, and the point at which reference resolution was possible within sentences. Source-localized MEG responses revealed brain activity associated with reference resolution that was independent of the modality of the referents, localized to the medial parietal lobe and starting ~415 ms after the onset of reference resolving words. A modality-specific response to reference resolution in auditory domains was also found, in the vicinity of auditory cortex. Our results suggest that referential language processing cannot be reduced to processing in classical language regions and representations of the referential domain in modality-specific neural systems. Instead, our results suggest that reference resolution engages medial parietal cortex, which supports a mechanism for referential processing regardless of the content modality.",
    keywords = "Language comprehension, MEG, Reference, Situation model, Visual world",
    author = "Christian Brodbeck and Laura Gwilliams and Liina Pylkkanen",
    year = "2016",
    month = "12",
    day = "15",
    doi = "10.1523/ENEURO.0145-16.2016",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "3",
    journal = "eNeuro",
    issn = "2373-2822",
    publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Language in context

    T2 - MEG evidence for modality-general and -specific responses to reference resolution

    AU - Brodbeck, Christian

    AU - Gwilliams, Laura

    AU - Pylkkanen, Liina

    PY - 2016/12/15

    Y1 - 2016/12/15

    N2 - Successful language comprehension critically depends on our ability to link linguistic expressions to the entities they refer to. Without reference resolution, newly encountered language cannot be related to previously acquired knowledge. The human experience includes many different types of referents, some visual, some auditory, some very abstract. Does the neural basis of reference resolution depend on the nature of the referents, or do our brains use a modality-general mechanism for linking meanings to referents? Here we report evidence for both. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we varied both the modality of referents, which consisted either of visual or auditory objects, and the point at which reference resolution was possible within sentences. Source-localized MEG responses revealed brain activity associated with reference resolution that was independent of the modality of the referents, localized to the medial parietal lobe and starting ~415 ms after the onset of reference resolving words. A modality-specific response to reference resolution in auditory domains was also found, in the vicinity of auditory cortex. Our results suggest that referential language processing cannot be reduced to processing in classical language regions and representations of the referential domain in modality-specific neural systems. Instead, our results suggest that reference resolution engages medial parietal cortex, which supports a mechanism for referential processing regardless of the content modality.

    AB - Successful language comprehension critically depends on our ability to link linguistic expressions to the entities they refer to. Without reference resolution, newly encountered language cannot be related to previously acquired knowledge. The human experience includes many different types of referents, some visual, some auditory, some very abstract. Does the neural basis of reference resolution depend on the nature of the referents, or do our brains use a modality-general mechanism for linking meanings to referents? Here we report evidence for both. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we varied both the modality of referents, which consisted either of visual or auditory objects, and the point at which reference resolution was possible within sentences. Source-localized MEG responses revealed brain activity associated with reference resolution that was independent of the modality of the referents, localized to the medial parietal lobe and starting ~415 ms after the onset of reference resolving words. A modality-specific response to reference resolution in auditory domains was also found, in the vicinity of auditory cortex. Our results suggest that referential language processing cannot be reduced to processing in classical language regions and representations of the referential domain in modality-specific neural systems. Instead, our results suggest that reference resolution engages medial parietal cortex, which supports a mechanism for referential processing regardless of the content modality.

    KW - Language comprehension

    KW - MEG

    KW - Reference

    KW - Situation model

    KW - Visual world

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032169930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032169930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1523/ENEURO.0145-16.2016

    DO - 10.1523/ENEURO.0145-16.2016

    M3 - Article

    VL - 3

    JO - eNeuro

    JF - eNeuro

    SN - 2373-2822

    IS - 6

    M1 - e0145

    ER -