Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness

Paulo Coelho, C. Calamia, M. Harsono, V. P. Thompson, N. R F A Silva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that microtensile bond strength values are inversely proportional to dentin-to-composite adhesive layer thickness through laboratory mechanical testing and finite element analysis. Method: Eighteen noncarious third molars were obtained, and occlusal enamel removed perpendicular to the tooth long axis. Two different adhesive systems were utilized as follows (n = 3): (1) application of a single layer of Single Bond (3M ESPE Co.) and Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Co.) following the manufacturer's directions; (2) application of one layer of both adhesive systems followed by one additional layer; (3) application of one layer of both adhesive systems followed by two additional layers. A 4 mm build up was fabricated in increments on each tooth sample (Z 100 composite, 3M ESPE). Section measurements were performed and specimens were separated into three adhesive thickness groups per material (40, 40-80 and 80-120 μm) for microtensile testing. The bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Maximum principal stresses (MPS) were determined through FEA for three different adhesive layer thicknesses (20, 50 and 100 μm). Results: The bond strength data obtained for Single Bond at 0-40 μm presented significantly higher values compared to higher adhesive layer thickness groups. There were no statistical differences among bond strength values for all Clearfil SE Bond adhesive layer thicknesses. FEA modeling indicated that MPS increased as adhesive layer increased. The hypothesis was accepted for the Single Bond only. Significance: Correspondence (not tested statistically) between microtensile laboratory testing and FEA model was only observed for Single Bond as increased adhesive layer thickness did not reduce Clearfil SE Bond strength.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1297-1303
Number of pages7
JournalDental Materials
Volume24
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Dentin
Adhesives
Finite element method
Composite materials
Tooth
Finite Element Analysis
Third Molar
Enamels
Mechanical testing
Testing
Dental Enamel
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of Variance
single bond

Keywords

  • Adhesive system
  • Finite element analysis
  • Microtensile bond strength

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness. / Coelho, Paulo; Calamia, C.; Harsono, M.; Thompson, V. P.; Silva, N. R F A.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 24, No. 10, 10.2008, p. 1297-1303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coelho, Paulo ; Calamia, C. ; Harsono, M. ; Thompson, V. P. ; Silva, N. R F A. / Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness. In: Dental Materials. 2008 ; Vol. 24, No. 10. pp. 1297-1303.
@article{1451b05eb741425182833cc3fc1e827f,
title = "Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that microtensile bond strength values are inversely proportional to dentin-to-composite adhesive layer thickness through laboratory mechanical testing and finite element analysis. Method: Eighteen noncarious third molars were obtained, and occlusal enamel removed perpendicular to the tooth long axis. Two different adhesive systems were utilized as follows (n = 3): (1) application of a single layer of Single Bond (3M ESPE Co.) and Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Co.) following the manufacturer's directions; (2) application of one layer of both adhesive systems followed by one additional layer; (3) application of one layer of both adhesive systems followed by two additional layers. A 4 mm build up was fabricated in increments on each tooth sample (Z 100 composite, 3M ESPE). Section measurements were performed and specimens were separated into three adhesive thickness groups per material (40, 40-80 and 80-120 μm) for microtensile testing. The bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Maximum principal stresses (MPS) were determined through FEA for three different adhesive layer thicknesses (20, 50 and 100 μm). Results: The bond strength data obtained for Single Bond at 0-40 μm presented significantly higher values compared to higher adhesive layer thickness groups. There were no statistical differences among bond strength values for all Clearfil SE Bond adhesive layer thicknesses. FEA modeling indicated that MPS increased as adhesive layer increased. The hypothesis was accepted for the Single Bond only. Significance: Correspondence (not tested statistically) between microtensile laboratory testing and FEA model was only observed for Single Bond as increased adhesive layer thickness did not reduce Clearfil SE Bond strength.",
keywords = "Adhesive system, Finite element analysis, Microtensile bond strength",
author = "Paulo Coelho and C. Calamia and M. Harsono and Thompson, {V. P.} and Silva, {N. R F A}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1297--1303",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness

AU - Coelho, Paulo

AU - Calamia, C.

AU - Harsono, M.

AU - Thompson, V. P.

AU - Silva, N. R F A

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that microtensile bond strength values are inversely proportional to dentin-to-composite adhesive layer thickness through laboratory mechanical testing and finite element analysis. Method: Eighteen noncarious third molars were obtained, and occlusal enamel removed perpendicular to the tooth long axis. Two different adhesive systems were utilized as follows (n = 3): (1) application of a single layer of Single Bond (3M ESPE Co.) and Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Co.) following the manufacturer's directions; (2) application of one layer of both adhesive systems followed by one additional layer; (3) application of one layer of both adhesive systems followed by two additional layers. A 4 mm build up was fabricated in increments on each tooth sample (Z 100 composite, 3M ESPE). Section measurements were performed and specimens were separated into three adhesive thickness groups per material (40, 40-80 and 80-120 μm) for microtensile testing. The bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Maximum principal stresses (MPS) were determined through FEA for three different adhesive layer thicknesses (20, 50 and 100 μm). Results: The bond strength data obtained for Single Bond at 0-40 μm presented significantly higher values compared to higher adhesive layer thickness groups. There were no statistical differences among bond strength values for all Clearfil SE Bond adhesive layer thicknesses. FEA modeling indicated that MPS increased as adhesive layer increased. The hypothesis was accepted for the Single Bond only. Significance: Correspondence (not tested statistically) between microtensile laboratory testing and FEA model was only observed for Single Bond as increased adhesive layer thickness did not reduce Clearfil SE Bond strength.

AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that microtensile bond strength values are inversely proportional to dentin-to-composite adhesive layer thickness through laboratory mechanical testing and finite element analysis. Method: Eighteen noncarious third molars were obtained, and occlusal enamel removed perpendicular to the tooth long axis. Two different adhesive systems were utilized as follows (n = 3): (1) application of a single layer of Single Bond (3M ESPE Co.) and Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Co.) following the manufacturer's directions; (2) application of one layer of both adhesive systems followed by one additional layer; (3) application of one layer of both adhesive systems followed by two additional layers. A 4 mm build up was fabricated in increments on each tooth sample (Z 100 composite, 3M ESPE). Section measurements were performed and specimens were separated into three adhesive thickness groups per material (40, 40-80 and 80-120 μm) for microtensile testing. The bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Maximum principal stresses (MPS) were determined through FEA for three different adhesive layer thicknesses (20, 50 and 100 μm). Results: The bond strength data obtained for Single Bond at 0-40 μm presented significantly higher values compared to higher adhesive layer thickness groups. There were no statistical differences among bond strength values for all Clearfil SE Bond adhesive layer thicknesses. FEA modeling indicated that MPS increased as adhesive layer increased. The hypothesis was accepted for the Single Bond only. Significance: Correspondence (not tested statistically) between microtensile laboratory testing and FEA model was only observed for Single Bond as increased adhesive layer thickness did not reduce Clearfil SE Bond strength.

KW - Adhesive system

KW - Finite element analysis

KW - Microtensile bond strength

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48749106128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48749106128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.007

DO - 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.007

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 1297

EP - 1303

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 10

ER -