L-Dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema

Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity

Mei R. Fu, C. M. Cleland, A. A. Guth, M. Kayal, J. Haber, F. Cartwright, R. Kleinman, Y. Kang, J. Scagliola, D. Axelrod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Advances in bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) permit the assessment of lymphedema by directly measuring lymph fluid changes. The objective of the study was to examine the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of cross-sectional assessment of BIA in detecting lymphedema in a large metropolitan clinical setting. BIA was used to measure lymph fluid changes. Limb volume by sequential circumferential tape measurement was used to validate the presence of lymphedema. Data were collected from 250 women, including healthy female adults, breast cancer survivors with lymphedema, and those at risk for lymphedema. Reliability, sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve were estimated. BIA ratio, as indicated by L-Dex ratio, was highly reliable among healthy women (ICC=0.99; 95% CI = 0.99-0.99), survivors at-risk for lymphedema (ICC=0.99; 95% CI = 0.99-0.99), and all women (ICC=0.85; 95% CI = 0.81-0.87); reliability was acceptable for survivors with lymphedema (ICC=0.69; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.80). The L-Dex ratio with a diagnostic cutoff of >+7.1 discriminated between at-risk breast cancer survivors and those with lymphedema with 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity (AUC=0.86). BIA ratio was significantly correlated with limb volume by sequential circumferential tape measurement. Cross-sectional assessment of BIA may have a role in clinical practice by adding confidence in detecting lymphedema. It is important to note that using a cutoff of L-Dex ratio >+7.1 still misses 20% of true lymphedema cases, it is important for clinicians to integrate other assessment methods (such as self-report, clinical observation, or perometry) to ensure the accurate detection of lymphedema.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)85-96
Number of pages12
JournalLymphology
Volume46
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Lymphedema
Sensitivity and Specificity
Electric Impedance
Survivors
Lymph
Area Under Curve
Breast Cancer Lymphedema
Extremities
Breast Neoplasms
ROC Curve
Self Report
Observation

Keywords

  • Bioimpedance
  • Breast cancer
  • Impedance
  • Impedance ratio
  • L-Dex
  • Lymphedema

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Hematology

Cite this

Fu, M. R., Cleland, C. M., Guth, A. A., Kayal, M., Haber, J., Cartwright, F., ... Axelrod, D. (2013). L-Dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. Lymphology, 46(2), 85-96.

L-Dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema : Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. / Fu, Mei R.; Cleland, C. M.; Guth, A. A.; Kayal, M.; Haber, J.; Cartwright, F.; Kleinman, R.; Kang, Y.; Scagliola, J.; Axelrod, D.

In: Lymphology, Vol. 46, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 85-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fu, MR, Cleland, CM, Guth, AA, Kayal, M, Haber, J, Cartwright, F, Kleinman, R, Kang, Y, Scagliola, J & Axelrod, D 2013, 'L-Dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity', Lymphology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 85-96.
Fu, Mei R. ; Cleland, C. M. ; Guth, A. A. ; Kayal, M. ; Haber, J. ; Cartwright, F. ; Kleinman, R. ; Kang, Y. ; Scagliola, J. ; Axelrod, D. / L-Dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema : Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. In: Lymphology. 2013 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 85-96.
@article{b04b0c7a287e49fa88193c6faca3ccab,
title = "L-Dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema: Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity",
abstract = "Advances in bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) permit the assessment of lymphedema by directly measuring lymph fluid changes. The objective of the study was to examine the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of cross-sectional assessment of BIA in detecting lymphedema in a large metropolitan clinical setting. BIA was used to measure lymph fluid changes. Limb volume by sequential circumferential tape measurement was used to validate the presence of lymphedema. Data were collected from 250 women, including healthy female adults, breast cancer survivors with lymphedema, and those at risk for lymphedema. Reliability, sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve were estimated. BIA ratio, as indicated by L-Dex ratio, was highly reliable among healthy women (ICC=0.99; 95{\%} CI = 0.99-0.99), survivors at-risk for lymphedema (ICC=0.99; 95{\%} CI = 0.99-0.99), and all women (ICC=0.85; 95{\%} CI = 0.81-0.87); reliability was acceptable for survivors with lymphedema (ICC=0.69; 95{\%} CI = 0.54 to 0.80). The L-Dex ratio with a diagnostic cutoff of >+7.1 discriminated between at-risk breast cancer survivors and those with lymphedema with 80{\%} sensitivity and 90{\%} specificity (AUC=0.86). BIA ratio was significantly correlated with limb volume by sequential circumferential tape measurement. Cross-sectional assessment of BIA may have a role in clinical practice by adding confidence in detecting lymphedema. It is important to note that using a cutoff of L-Dex ratio >+7.1 still misses 20{\%} of true lymphedema cases, it is important for clinicians to integrate other assessment methods (such as self-report, clinical observation, or perometry) to ensure the accurate detection of lymphedema.",
keywords = "Bioimpedance, Breast cancer, Impedance, Impedance ratio, L-Dex, Lymphedema",
author = "Fu, {Mei R.} and Cleland, {C. M.} and Guth, {A. A.} and M. Kayal and J. Haber and F. Cartwright and R. Kleinman and Y. Kang and J. Scagliola and D. Axelrod",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "85--96",
journal = "Lymphology",
issn = "0024-7766",
publisher = "International Society of Lymphology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - L-Dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema

T2 - Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity

AU - Fu, Mei R.

AU - Cleland, C. M.

AU - Guth, A. A.

AU - Kayal, M.

AU - Haber, J.

AU - Cartwright, F.

AU - Kleinman, R.

AU - Kang, Y.

AU - Scagliola, J.

AU - Axelrod, D.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Advances in bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) permit the assessment of lymphedema by directly measuring lymph fluid changes. The objective of the study was to examine the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of cross-sectional assessment of BIA in detecting lymphedema in a large metropolitan clinical setting. BIA was used to measure lymph fluid changes. Limb volume by sequential circumferential tape measurement was used to validate the presence of lymphedema. Data were collected from 250 women, including healthy female adults, breast cancer survivors with lymphedema, and those at risk for lymphedema. Reliability, sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve were estimated. BIA ratio, as indicated by L-Dex ratio, was highly reliable among healthy women (ICC=0.99; 95% CI = 0.99-0.99), survivors at-risk for lymphedema (ICC=0.99; 95% CI = 0.99-0.99), and all women (ICC=0.85; 95% CI = 0.81-0.87); reliability was acceptable for survivors with lymphedema (ICC=0.69; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.80). The L-Dex ratio with a diagnostic cutoff of >+7.1 discriminated between at-risk breast cancer survivors and those with lymphedema with 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity (AUC=0.86). BIA ratio was significantly correlated with limb volume by sequential circumferential tape measurement. Cross-sectional assessment of BIA may have a role in clinical practice by adding confidence in detecting lymphedema. It is important to note that using a cutoff of L-Dex ratio >+7.1 still misses 20% of true lymphedema cases, it is important for clinicians to integrate other assessment methods (such as self-report, clinical observation, or perometry) to ensure the accurate detection of lymphedema.

AB - Advances in bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) permit the assessment of lymphedema by directly measuring lymph fluid changes. The objective of the study was to examine the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of cross-sectional assessment of BIA in detecting lymphedema in a large metropolitan clinical setting. BIA was used to measure lymph fluid changes. Limb volume by sequential circumferential tape measurement was used to validate the presence of lymphedema. Data were collected from 250 women, including healthy female adults, breast cancer survivors with lymphedema, and those at risk for lymphedema. Reliability, sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve were estimated. BIA ratio, as indicated by L-Dex ratio, was highly reliable among healthy women (ICC=0.99; 95% CI = 0.99-0.99), survivors at-risk for lymphedema (ICC=0.99; 95% CI = 0.99-0.99), and all women (ICC=0.85; 95% CI = 0.81-0.87); reliability was acceptable for survivors with lymphedema (ICC=0.69; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.80). The L-Dex ratio with a diagnostic cutoff of >+7.1 discriminated between at-risk breast cancer survivors and those with lymphedema with 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity (AUC=0.86). BIA ratio was significantly correlated with limb volume by sequential circumferential tape measurement. Cross-sectional assessment of BIA may have a role in clinical practice by adding confidence in detecting lymphedema. It is important to note that using a cutoff of L-Dex ratio >+7.1 still misses 20% of true lymphedema cases, it is important for clinicians to integrate other assessment methods (such as self-report, clinical observation, or perometry) to ensure the accurate detection of lymphedema.

KW - Bioimpedance

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Impedance

KW - Impedance ratio

KW - L-Dex

KW - Lymphedema

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885740063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885740063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 85

EP - 96

JO - Lymphology

JF - Lymphology

SN - 0024-7766

IS - 2

ER -