Keeping people out: Income distribution, zoning, and the quality of public education

Raquel Fernandez, Richard Rogerson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We examine the effect of community zoning regulations on allocations and welfare in a two-community model. Individuals choose in which community to live and each community levies a tax, chosen via majority vote, on local property to finance local public education. We study both exogenously specified and endogenously chosen zoning regulations. In equilibrium, the two communities are stratified by income. Theoretical analysis indicates that a number of outcomes are possible. Several interesting results emerge: Zoning tends to make the richer community more exclusive, but the gap between education expenditures may decrease. Moreover, welfare effects are not monotone in income.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)23-42
    Number of pages20
    JournalInternational Economic Review
    Volume38
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Feb 1997

    Fingerprint

    Public education
    Income distribution
    Zoning
    Income
    Local finance
    Theoretical analysis
    Vote
    Welfare effects
    Education expenditures
    Tax

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    Keeping people out : Income distribution, zoning, and the quality of public education. / Fernandez, Raquel; Rogerson, Richard.

    In: International Economic Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, 02.1997, p. 23-42.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Fernandez, Raquel ; Rogerson, Richard. / Keeping people out : Income distribution, zoning, and the quality of public education. In: International Economic Review. 1997 ; Vol. 38, No. 1. pp. 23-42.
    @article{2046e9f2573c437794ed48f641af3517,
    title = "Keeping people out: Income distribution, zoning, and the quality of public education",
    abstract = "We examine the effect of community zoning regulations on allocations and welfare in a two-community model. Individuals choose in which community to live and each community levies a tax, chosen via majority vote, on local property to finance local public education. We study both exogenously specified and endogenously chosen zoning regulations. In equilibrium, the two communities are stratified by income. Theoretical analysis indicates that a number of outcomes are possible. Several interesting results emerge: Zoning tends to make the richer community more exclusive, but the gap between education expenditures may decrease. Moreover, welfare effects are not monotone in income.",
    author = "Raquel Fernandez and Richard Rogerson",
    year = "1997",
    month = "2",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "38",
    pages = "23--42",
    journal = "International Economic Review",
    issn = "0020-6598",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Keeping people out

    T2 - Income distribution, zoning, and the quality of public education

    AU - Fernandez, Raquel

    AU - Rogerson, Richard

    PY - 1997/2

    Y1 - 1997/2

    N2 - We examine the effect of community zoning regulations on allocations and welfare in a two-community model. Individuals choose in which community to live and each community levies a tax, chosen via majority vote, on local property to finance local public education. We study both exogenously specified and endogenously chosen zoning regulations. In equilibrium, the two communities are stratified by income. Theoretical analysis indicates that a number of outcomes are possible. Several interesting results emerge: Zoning tends to make the richer community more exclusive, but the gap between education expenditures may decrease. Moreover, welfare effects are not monotone in income.

    AB - We examine the effect of community zoning regulations on allocations and welfare in a two-community model. Individuals choose in which community to live and each community levies a tax, chosen via majority vote, on local property to finance local public education. We study both exogenously specified and endogenously chosen zoning regulations. In equilibrium, the two communities are stratified by income. Theoretical analysis indicates that a number of outcomes are possible. Several interesting results emerge: Zoning tends to make the richer community more exclusive, but the gap between education expenditures may decrease. Moreover, welfare effects are not monotone in income.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040651867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040651867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0040651867

    VL - 38

    SP - 23

    EP - 42

    JO - International Economic Review

    JF - International Economic Review

    SN - 0020-6598

    IS - 1

    ER -