Kant's standpoint on the whole: Disjunctive judgment, community, and the third analogy of experience

Beatrice Longuenesse

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Kant claimed that the representation of the world by human beings depends on a system of fundamental categories or “pure concepts of the understanding.” He also claimed that these categories are originally nothing other than elementary logical functions, which find expression in logical forms of judgment. Kant expounded these functions in a systematic “table” that then became the architectonic principle not only for the Critique of Pure Reason but also for the Critique of Practical Reason and the Critique of Judgment. In a famous footnote to the Metaphysical Foundations of the Science of Nature (1783), Kant claimed that as long as one accepted the two cornerstones of his doctrine—the merely sensible, receptive character of our intuitions, for which space and time are a priori forms; and the derivation of categories from logical functions of judgment—then it mattered little if the details of his proofs (in particular, the details of his transcendental deduction of the categories) failed to carry complete conviction in the minds of his readers, for the two main points of his demonstration, as far as he was concerned, were sufficiently established. Those two points are that (1) we have a priori concepts of objects originating in the understanding alone, and (2) these concepts can be applied in cognition only to appearances (that is, to objects given in accordance with the a priori forms of space and time), not to things as they are in themselves.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationKant and the Concept of Community
PublisherBoydell and Brewer Ltd
Pages17-40
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781580467810
ISBN (Print)9781580463874
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Immanuel Kant
Logic
Architectonics
Reader
Conviction
Metaphysical
Logical Form
Human Being
Fundamental
Cognition
Nature
Intuition
Transcendental Deduction
Practical Reason
Critique of Pure Reason

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Longuenesse, B. (2011). Kant's standpoint on the whole: Disjunctive judgment, community, and the third analogy of experience. In Kant and the Concept of Community (pp. 17-40). Boydell and Brewer Ltd.

Kant's standpoint on the whole : Disjunctive judgment, community, and the third analogy of experience. / Longuenesse, Beatrice.

Kant and the Concept of Community. Boydell and Brewer Ltd, 2011. p. 17-40.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Longuenesse, B 2011, Kant's standpoint on the whole: Disjunctive judgment, community, and the third analogy of experience. in Kant and the Concept of Community. Boydell and Brewer Ltd, pp. 17-40.
Longuenesse B. Kant's standpoint on the whole: Disjunctive judgment, community, and the third analogy of experience. In Kant and the Concept of Community. Boydell and Brewer Ltd. 2011. p. 17-40
Longuenesse, Beatrice. / Kant's standpoint on the whole : Disjunctive judgment, community, and the third analogy of experience. Kant and the Concept of Community. Boydell and Brewer Ltd, 2011. pp. 17-40
@inbook{284e6d2bb1f14821b7e1dff198f4d897,
title = "Kant's standpoint on the whole: Disjunctive judgment, community, and the third analogy of experience",
abstract = "Kant claimed that the representation of the world by human beings depends on a system of fundamental categories or “pure concepts of the understanding.” He also claimed that these categories are originally nothing other than elementary logical functions, which find expression in logical forms of judgment. Kant expounded these functions in a systematic “table” that then became the architectonic principle not only for the Critique of Pure Reason but also for the Critique of Practical Reason and the Critique of Judgment. In a famous footnote to the Metaphysical Foundations of the Science of Nature (1783), Kant claimed that as long as one accepted the two cornerstones of his doctrine—the merely sensible, receptive character of our intuitions, for which space and time are a priori forms; and the derivation of categories from logical functions of judgment—then it mattered little if the details of his proofs (in particular, the details of his transcendental deduction of the categories) failed to carry complete conviction in the minds of his readers, for the two main points of his demonstration, as far as he was concerned, were sufficiently established. Those two points are that (1) we have a priori concepts of objects originating in the understanding alone, and (2) these concepts can be applied in cognition only to appearances (that is, to objects given in accordance with the a priori forms of space and time), not to things as they are in themselves.",
author = "Beatrice Longuenesse",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781580463874",
pages = "17--40",
booktitle = "Kant and the Concept of Community",
publisher = "Boydell and Brewer Ltd",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Kant's standpoint on the whole

T2 - Disjunctive judgment, community, and the third analogy of experience

AU - Longuenesse, Beatrice

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Kant claimed that the representation of the world by human beings depends on a system of fundamental categories or “pure concepts of the understanding.” He also claimed that these categories are originally nothing other than elementary logical functions, which find expression in logical forms of judgment. Kant expounded these functions in a systematic “table” that then became the architectonic principle not only for the Critique of Pure Reason but also for the Critique of Practical Reason and the Critique of Judgment. In a famous footnote to the Metaphysical Foundations of the Science of Nature (1783), Kant claimed that as long as one accepted the two cornerstones of his doctrine—the merely sensible, receptive character of our intuitions, for which space and time are a priori forms; and the derivation of categories from logical functions of judgment—then it mattered little if the details of his proofs (in particular, the details of his transcendental deduction of the categories) failed to carry complete conviction in the minds of his readers, for the two main points of his demonstration, as far as he was concerned, were sufficiently established. Those two points are that (1) we have a priori concepts of objects originating in the understanding alone, and (2) these concepts can be applied in cognition only to appearances (that is, to objects given in accordance with the a priori forms of space and time), not to things as they are in themselves.

AB - Kant claimed that the representation of the world by human beings depends on a system of fundamental categories or “pure concepts of the understanding.” He also claimed that these categories are originally nothing other than elementary logical functions, which find expression in logical forms of judgment. Kant expounded these functions in a systematic “table” that then became the architectonic principle not only for the Critique of Pure Reason but also for the Critique of Practical Reason and the Critique of Judgment. In a famous footnote to the Metaphysical Foundations of the Science of Nature (1783), Kant claimed that as long as one accepted the two cornerstones of his doctrine—the merely sensible, receptive character of our intuitions, for which space and time are a priori forms; and the derivation of categories from logical functions of judgment—then it mattered little if the details of his proofs (in particular, the details of his transcendental deduction of the categories) failed to carry complete conviction in the minds of his readers, for the two main points of his demonstration, as far as he was concerned, were sufficiently established. Those two points are that (1) we have a priori concepts of objects originating in the understanding alone, and (2) these concepts can be applied in cognition only to appearances (that is, to objects given in accordance with the a priori forms of space and time), not to things as they are in themselves.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940509608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940509608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781580463874

SP - 17

EP - 40

BT - Kant and the Concept of Community

PB - Boydell and Brewer Ltd

ER -