Kant’s leading thread in the analytic of the beautiful

Beatrice Longuenesse

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Kant conducts his Analytic of the Beautiful, in the Critique of the Power of Judgment, according to the “leading thread” that also guided the table of the categories in the first Critique: the four titles of the logical functions of judgement. This leading thread, which has not met with much favor on the part of Kant's readers where the first Critique is concerned, is even less popular in the case of the third Critique. In this essay, I will argue that this ill repute is unmerited. In fact, Kant's use of the leading thread of the logical functions of judgment to analyze judgments of taste merits close attention. In particular, it brings to light a striking feature of judgments of taste as analyzed by Kant. We would expect the main headings in the table of logical functions (quantity, quality, relation, modality) to guide the analysis of aesthetic judgments as judgments about an object (“this rose is beautiful,” “this painting is beautiful”). Now they certainly do serve this purpose. But in addition, it turns out that they also serve to analyze another judgment, one that remains implicitly contained within the predicate (“beautiful’) of the judgments of taste. This second judgment, embedded, as it were, in the first (or in the predicate of the first), and that only the critique of taste brings to discursive clarity, is a judgment no longer about the object, but about the judging subjects, namely, the subjects that pass the judgment: “this rose is beautiful,” “this painting is beautiful,” and so on.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages223-244
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9780511498220
ISBN (Print)9780521862011
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Immanuel Kant
Logic
Modality
Merit
Reader
Discursive
Aesthetic Judgment
Clarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Longuenesse, B. (2006). Kant’s leading thread in the analytic of the beautiful. In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy (pp. 223-244). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498220.008

Kant’s leading thread in the analytic of the beautiful. / Longuenesse, Beatrice.

Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2006. p. 223-244.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Longuenesse, B 2006, Kant’s leading thread in the analytic of the beautiful. in Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498220.008
Longuenesse B. Kant’s leading thread in the analytic of the beautiful. In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. 2006. p. 223-244 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498220.008
Longuenesse, Beatrice. / Kant’s leading thread in the analytic of the beautiful. Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2006. pp. 223-244
@inbook{cd7e9fb19a454ed6a1fae2a63ade2d67,
title = "Kant’s leading thread in the analytic of the beautiful",
abstract = "Kant conducts his Analytic of the Beautiful, in the Critique of the Power of Judgment, according to the “leading thread” that also guided the table of the categories in the first Critique: the four titles of the logical functions of judgement. This leading thread, which has not met with much favor on the part of Kant's readers where the first Critique is concerned, is even less popular in the case of the third Critique. In this essay, I will argue that this ill repute is unmerited. In fact, Kant's use of the leading thread of the logical functions of judgment to analyze judgments of taste merits close attention. In particular, it brings to light a striking feature of judgments of taste as analyzed by Kant. We would expect the main headings in the table of logical functions (quantity, quality, relation, modality) to guide the analysis of aesthetic judgments as judgments about an object (“this rose is beautiful,” “this painting is beautiful”). Now they certainly do serve this purpose. But in addition, it turns out that they also serve to analyze another judgment, one that remains implicitly contained within the predicate (“beautiful’) of the judgments of taste. This second judgment, embedded, as it were, in the first (or in the predicate of the first), and that only the critique of taste brings to discursive clarity, is a judgment no longer about the object, but about the judging subjects, namely, the subjects that pass the judgment: “this rose is beautiful,” “this painting is beautiful,” and so on.",
author = "Beatrice Longuenesse",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511498220.008",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521862011",
pages = "223--244",
booktitle = "Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Kant’s leading thread in the analytic of the beautiful

AU - Longuenesse, Beatrice

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Kant conducts his Analytic of the Beautiful, in the Critique of the Power of Judgment, according to the “leading thread” that also guided the table of the categories in the first Critique: the four titles of the logical functions of judgement. This leading thread, which has not met with much favor on the part of Kant's readers where the first Critique is concerned, is even less popular in the case of the third Critique. In this essay, I will argue that this ill repute is unmerited. In fact, Kant's use of the leading thread of the logical functions of judgment to analyze judgments of taste merits close attention. In particular, it brings to light a striking feature of judgments of taste as analyzed by Kant. We would expect the main headings in the table of logical functions (quantity, quality, relation, modality) to guide the analysis of aesthetic judgments as judgments about an object (“this rose is beautiful,” “this painting is beautiful”). Now they certainly do serve this purpose. But in addition, it turns out that they also serve to analyze another judgment, one that remains implicitly contained within the predicate (“beautiful’) of the judgments of taste. This second judgment, embedded, as it were, in the first (or in the predicate of the first), and that only the critique of taste brings to discursive clarity, is a judgment no longer about the object, but about the judging subjects, namely, the subjects that pass the judgment: “this rose is beautiful,” “this painting is beautiful,” and so on.

AB - Kant conducts his Analytic of the Beautiful, in the Critique of the Power of Judgment, according to the “leading thread” that also guided the table of the categories in the first Critique: the four titles of the logical functions of judgement. This leading thread, which has not met with much favor on the part of Kant's readers where the first Critique is concerned, is even less popular in the case of the third Critique. In this essay, I will argue that this ill repute is unmerited. In fact, Kant's use of the leading thread of the logical functions of judgment to analyze judgments of taste merits close attention. In particular, it brings to light a striking feature of judgments of taste as analyzed by Kant. We would expect the main headings in the table of logical functions (quantity, quality, relation, modality) to guide the analysis of aesthetic judgments as judgments about an object (“this rose is beautiful,” “this painting is beautiful”). Now they certainly do serve this purpose. But in addition, it turns out that they also serve to analyze another judgment, one that remains implicitly contained within the predicate (“beautiful’) of the judgments of taste. This second judgment, embedded, as it were, in the first (or in the predicate of the first), and that only the critique of taste brings to discursive clarity, is a judgment no longer about the object, but about the judging subjects, namely, the subjects that pass the judgment: “this rose is beautiful,” “this painting is beautiful,” and so on.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924614748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924614748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511498220.008

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511498220.008

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84924614748

SN - 9780521862011

SP - 223

EP - 244

BT - Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -